Bone marrow concentrate vs steroid shot for hip osteoarthritis
Official title: Randomized Trial on the Evaluation of the Effectiveness of One Single Bone Marrow Aspirate Hip Injection Versus Triamcinolone for Hip Osteoarthritis
Run by The Cleveland Clinic · NCT04990128 · Data updated 2026-11-12
In people with hip osteoarthritis, researchers test whether a bone marrow aspirate concentrate injection works differently from a Triamcinolone steroid injection to relieve pain and improve function.
Quick facts
| Phase | Phase 3 |
|---|---|
| Study type | Interventional |
| Ages | 18 Years to 75 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 100 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | The Cleveland Clinic Academic / other |
| Drugs / interventions | chemotherapy, radiation |
| Locations | 1 site (Weston, Florida) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | August 28, 2026 |
| Main results expected | October 2027 |
| Study ends | December 2027 |
| Registry record updated | September 9, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT04990128 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults aged 18–75 with unilateral or bilateral hip osteoarthritis and sufficient baseline pain and function.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with lower baseline pain, certain comorbidities, or contraindications to either procedure may not benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This randomized, single-blind, two-arm study compares one-time bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) injections to Triamcinolone injections in adults with hip osteoarthritis. Participants are assigned to either intervention, with outcomes measured from baseline to 12 months using validated patient-reported scores. The trial uses a sham procedure in the Triamcinolone arm to maintain blinding for patients. Enrollment aims for 100 total participants (50 per arm) across a single-site setting, with safety monitored during the BMAC arm as results from culture are reviewed. Primary endpoints focus on changes in pain and function over follow-up visits at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, patients may experience longer-lasting pain relief and functional improvement with BMAC compared to steroid injections.
How similar studies have gone: Prior studies have explored biologic injections for hip OA, with mixed results; this trial tests a similar approach in a rigorous randomized design.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion: 1. Provision of signed and dated consent form 2. Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study 3. Male or female, aged between 18 - 75 years old 4. WOMAC Pain Subscale Total Score of 5 or higher in the Likert Scale (total score is 20) 5. Kellgren-Lawrence Grade ≥ 2 on Hip X-Rays 6. Body Mass Index ≤ 35 kg/m\^2 7. Unilateral or Bilateral Hip Osteoarthritis 8. Prior physical therapy treatment for 6 weeks in the last 12 months and compliance with home exercise program 9. Agreement to adhere to Lifestyle Considerations 10. Discontinuation of pain/anti-inflammatory medications 2 week prior to baseline measurements 11. Patients with cancer in remission for at least 5 years. Specific cancers which were treated with surgical resection and are not undergoing chemotherapy/radiation therapy such as breast cancer, colon cancer, or skin cancer, and others could participate when deemed in remission for 1 year. Written approval from oncologist will be necessary prior to enrollment 12. Negative gram stain result Exclusion: 1. Prior corticosteroid injection to the hip 2. History of hip replacement(s) 3. Noncompliance to preventive screening tests for cancer indicated by age 4. Active autoimmune disease 5. Current use of oral corticosteroid 6. Use of immunosuppressive medications, or who are known to me immunocompromised 7. Inability to be weaned of oral anti-inflammatory medications 8. History of Diabetes or HbA1c ≥ 6.5% 9. Uncontrolled Thyroid Dysfunction: 0.450 uIU/mL ≥ TSH levels ≥ 4.500 uIU/mL 10. Vitamin D Level \< 30 ng/ml 11. Anemia (Hgb \< 11.7 g/dL for Women; Hgb \< 13 g/dL for men) 12. eGFR \< 60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2 13. Thrombocytopenia with platelet count less than 150,000 x 10\^9 L 14. Patients with coagulopathies based on known clotting disorder 15. Patients currently on anti-coagulation therapies 16. Patients who report any active infection(s) including cellulitis, TB, HIV, COVID, Hepatitis B and C 17. Moving over the next year 18. Inability to consent to the research study 19. Inability to complete forms electronically 20. Subjects in any other clinical trials 21. History of allergic reaction to lidocaine 22. Pregnancy or planning to be pregnant during trial 23. Breastfeeding
Where it's running
-
Cleveland Clinic Florida
Weston, Florida, United States Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Leonardo P Oliveira, Md — Cleveland Clinic Florida
- Study coordinator: Leonardo P Oliveira, Md
- Email: oliveil@ccf.org
- Phone: (954)659-5430
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Ceramic hip resurfacing vs total hip arthroplasty for hip OA
This trial tests whether ceramic hip resurfacing helps people with hip OA walk farther each day than a modern total hip replacement.
-
Dexmedetomidine during hip replacement to modulate nerves and inflammation
A randomized, placebo-controlled study tests whether intravenous dexmedetomidine given during spinal anesthesia with a PENG nerve block can help regulate the body's stress and inflammatory response and improve recovery after hip replacement.
-
Preoperative Fasting to Shape the Gut with Hip Replacement
This trial tests whether a 20-day preoperative fasting plan can lower inflammatory signals and broaden gut microbes in adults undergoing total hip arthroplasty.
-
Cryoneurolysis for Chronic Pain: 6- and 12-Month Outcomes in Routine Care
This study tests whether cryoneurolysis, done as part of standard care for people with chronic pain, leads to meaningful improvements over 6 to 12 months.
-
Spinal anesthesia with intrathecal morphine vs PENG block (with or without dexamethasone) for hip replacement
In people aged 60 and older undergoing total hip arthroplasty, this study tests whether three anesthesia approaches provide better pain control and fewer side effects: spinal with intrathecal morphine, spinal with a PENG block, or spinal with a PENG block plus dexamethasone.
-
Intravenous dexamethasone for better pain control after hip replacement with a PENG block
This study tests whether giving dexamethasone through a vein, in 0, 4, or 8 mg doses, helps control pain after total hip arthroplasty when used with a PENG block.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.