Clinical trial Recruiting at 7 sites Interventional Ages 18 and up

Anesthesia choice for mechanical thrombectomy in ischemic stroke

Official title: General Anesthesia Versus Procedural Sedation in Endovascular Therapy for Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke: A Multicenter Prospective Randomized Trial

Run by University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand · NCT07235514 · Data updated 2026-11-12

In people with severe ischemic stroke due to a large vessel blockage who need mechanical thrombectomy, this study tests whether general anesthesia works better than procedural sedation for improving daily function 3 months later.

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
Ages18 Years and up
SexAll
Enrollment958 (estimated)
SponsorUniversity Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
Academic / other
Locations16 sites (Angers and 15 other locations)
StatusRecruiting
StartedMarch 24, 2026
Main results expectedJune 24, 2029
Study endsJune 24, 2029
Registry record updatedSeptember 2, 2026
Trial IDNCT07235514 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Adults with acute ischemic stroke due to intracranial carotid and/or proximal MCA occlusion, eligible for mechanical thrombectomy, and able to provide consent or have a surrogate/emergency consent.

Probably not a fit

Patients not showing functional improvement from anesthesia strategy due to factors beyond the intervention, or those with contraindications to GA or PS.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This randomized study compares two anesthesia approaches—general anesthesia with airway control versus procedural sedation with spontaneous breathing—during mechanical thrombectomy for anterior circulation ischemic stroke. The goal is to see which approach leads to better functional outcomes, measured by the modified Rankin Scale at 3 months, while considering safety and procedure performance. Prior data from small European trials suggested possible advantages for GA, but results were inconclusive, prompting a larger, multicenter comparison. The study involves adult patients eligible for thrombectomy and requires an anesthesia team to manage sedation and airway as appropriate. Primary endpoints focus on functional independence after stroke, with secondary considerations including peri-procedural complications and hemodynamic stability.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If GA proves superior, patients may achieve better independence in daily life after stroke.

How similar studies have gone: Three European single-center trials and a pooled meta-analysis have explored GA versus PS, with mixed results suggesting potential benefit but not definitive superiority.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* Age ≥18 years
* Acute ischemic stroke with an occlusion of the intracranial internal carotid artery and/or the proximal middle cerebral artery (M1-M2) with or without association of extracranial occlusion of the cervical internal carotid artery (tandem lesion)
* Eligible for mechanical thrombectomy according to international guidelines
* Informed and signed consent of patient, or if he is unable to consent the consent of patient's relative or emergency procedure in the absence of relative
* National health insurance

Exclusion Criteria:

* Coma or altered vigilance defined as a score ≥ 2 on the level of consciousness 1A subscale of the NIHSS
* Premorbid disability defined as a mRS \> 2
* Posterior circulation stroke
* Associated cerebral hemorrhage
* Stroke complicating another acute illness or postoperative stroke
* Emesis at arrival in angiosuite
* Allergy to anesthetic medication
* Pregnant or breast-feeding women
* Adult under the protection of the law

Where it's running

  • CHU de Clermont-Ferrand
    Clermont-Ferrand, France
    Recruiting
  • Le centre hospitalier universitaire de Lille
    Lille, France
    Recruiting
  • Les Hospices Civils de Lyon
    Lyon, France
    Recruiting
  • L'Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille
    Marseille, France
    Recruiting
  • Le Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes
    Nantes, France
    Recruiting
  • L'Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
    Paris, France
    Recruiting
Show 10 more locations
  • Le Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse
    Toulouse, France
    Recruiting
  • Le Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers
    Angers, France
    Active not recruiting
  • Le Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Morvan de Brest de Brest
    Brest, France
    Not yet recruiting
  • Le centre hospitalier universitaire de Montpellier
    Montpellier, France
    Not yet recruiting
  • Le Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de La Réunion
    Saint-Denis, France
    Not yet recruiting
  • Le Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Etienne
    Saint-Etienne, France
    Not yet recruiting
  • Le Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Strasbourg
    Strasbourg, France
    Active not recruiting
  • L'hôpital Foch
    Suresnes, France
    Not yet recruiting
  • Le Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux
    Talence, France
    Active not recruiting
  • Le Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours
    Tours, France
    Not yet recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.