Pulse Wave vs Saline Bolus EIT to measure lung perfusion in ARDS
Official title: Pulse Wave Method Versus Saline Contrast Pulmonary Perfusion EIT Imaging for Detecting Pulmonary Perfusion in ARDS Patients: a Prospective Observational Study
Run by Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology · NCT07908368 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study tests whether pulse wave EIT or saline bolus EIT can best show lung blood flow in ARDS patients on mechanical ventilation.
Quick facts
| Study type | Observational |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 80 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 20 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Wuhan, Hubei) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | December 22, 2025 |
| Main results expected | December 30, 2027 |
| Study ends | December 30, 2027 |
| Registry record updated | November 2, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07908368 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults aged 18-80 with ARDS on mechanical ventilation, and with a subclavian or internal jugular venous catheter in place.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with major comorbidities or conditions listed in the exclusion criteria may not experience any perfusion-imaging benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This observational study compares two electrical impedance tomography (EIT) methods—pulse wave EIT and saline bolus EIT—for assessing pulmonary perfusion in adults with ARDS who are mechanically ventilated. It also explores how different positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels affect perfusion imaging accuracy. Real-time, bedside imaging aims to enhance understanding of ventilation-perfusion status to support individualized, precision care. The trial leverages noninvasive EIT signals to monitor dynamic cardiopulmonary physiology during critical illness. Participants meet criteria typical for severe ARDS requiring intubation and venous access, with exclusions to minimize risk and confounding conditions.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the approach could provide clinicians with a noninvasive, real-time way to monitor pulmonary perfusion to guide treatment decisions in ARDS.
How similar studies have gone: Previous uses of EIT for ventilation are established; perfusion imaging is more exploratory but has shown promise in pilot studies.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age: 18-80 years; 2. Endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation; 3. Presence of a subclavian or internal jugular venous catheter in place; 4. Diagnosis of ARDS according to the 2023 global ARDS definition. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Age \<18 or \>80 years; 2. Severe obesity (BMI ≥35 kg/m²); 3. Pregnant or lactating women; 4. Pulmonary diseases: acute asthma exacerbation, COPD, pulmonary fibrosis, pleural effusion, pneumothorax, or pulmonary embolism; 5. Cardiac diseases: arrhythmias, significant valvular regurgitation, or cardiac dysfunction (LVEF \<50% or right ventricular dysfunction); 6. Hypernatremia; 7. Receiving ECMO therapy; 8. Failure to provide informed consent.
Where it's running
-
Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Wuhan, Hubei, China Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Xue Tian, MD
- Email: m202376326@hust.edu.cn
- Phone: 027-85351606
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Using electrical impedance tomography to guide PEEP settings in patients with moderate to severe ARDS
This study is testing if using a special imaging technique to set breathing support can help patients with severe lung issues breathe better and recover faster while on a ventilator.
-
Computed inspiratory muscle pressure to monitor inspiratory effort during pressure-targeted assist/control ventilation
This study tests a noninvasive computed pressure method (cPmus) to see if it matches the traditional esophageal pressure method for measuring inspiratory effort in adults on pressure-targeted ventilation with spontaneous breathing.
-
Noninvasive estimate of inspiratory effort to monitor pressure support ventilation
This study tests whether a noninvasive computed inspiratory muscle pressure (cPmus) can match the traditional esophageal pressure method for adults on pressure support ventilation.
-
Driving pressure-guided individualized PEEP vs standard PEEP during upper abdominal surgery
In this randomized trial, adults at higher risk of breathing problems after upper abdominal surgery will try a personalized PEEP level based on the lowest driving pressure and compare it to a fixed PEEP of 5 cmH2O to see if it lowers postoperative lung complications.
-
Inspiratory Effort and Dyspnea During Assisted Mechanical Ventilation in Critically Ill Adults
This study tests how different patient breathing efforts relate to breathlessness in adults on assisted mechanical ventilation.
-
FCV vs VC—Obese Adults Undergoing Laparoscopic Surgery
In obese adults having laparoscopic surgery, researchers will see if flow-controlled ventilation (FCV) works better than volume-controlled ventilation with autoflow (VC-AF) at keeping airway pressures and lung energy lower.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.