Osseodensification forMol ar Septum Expansion in Immediate Molar Implants
Official title: "Osseodensification Efficacy on Molar Septum Expansion in Immediate Molar Implant Placement: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Run by Ain Shams University · NCT07108361 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study tests whether osseodensification helps place immediate molar implants more stably compared with traditional drilling, in adults needing extraction and replacement teeth.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 50 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 80 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Ain Shams University Academic / other |
| Locations | 2 sites (Cairo and 1 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | September 1, 2025 |
| Main results expected | September 2027 |
| Study ends | September 2028 |
| Registry record updated | October 5, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07108361 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults aged 18-50 requiring extraction of posterior molars and immediate replacement with dental implants, with ASA I or II health, and able to comply with follow-up.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with smoking, pregnancy, prior implant failure at the site, active infection, or significant systemic conditions may not benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
Two arms compare osseodensification to conventional drilling for immediate molar implant placement after extraction. The randomized clinical arm includes 80 patients from Ain Shams University, with half receiving osseodensification and half conventional drilling, and a sub-division for grafting of the jumping gap. Outcomes include septum dimensions, ridge changes, bone density, implant stability, and patient satisfaction, assessed perioperatively and postoperatively using CBCT, impressions, and standardized clinical measurements. An ex-vivo arm is also planned to further analyze microarchitectural effects. Primary aim is to determine if osseodensification improves primary stability and preserves ridge anatomy compared with conventional drilling.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, patients may experience better implant stability and preservation of surrounding bone and soft-tissue contours after immediate molar implant placement.
How similar studies have gone: Previous work suggests osseodensification can enhance primary stability and bone microarchitecture, but evidence in molar extraction sockets is limited and this study explores that context.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients requiring placement in the posterior region. * ASA I and II patients who can undergo immediate implant placement and restorative procedures. * Both males and females. * Patient's age: 18-50 years old. * Patients who can come for the follow-up visit. * Patients who provide written informed consent Exclusion Criteria: * Pregnancy. * Smoking * Patients with previously failed dental implants at the implant placement site. * Patients with active infections. * Other medical conditions that might affect the osseointegration of dental implants, such as diabetes, cardiovascular disease, hypertension, and osteoporosis
Where it's running
-
Ain Shams University
Cairo, Egypt Recruiting -
Ain Shams University
Cairo, Egypt Not yet recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Mohammed Samir
- Email: mohamedsamirramardan@dent.asu.edu.eg
- Phone: 01144063175
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Socket-shield versus conventional immediate implant placement in the front jaw
This trial tests whether using the socket-shield technique during immediate implant placement in the upper front teeth better preserves bone and gum health than the standard method.
-
Magnesium membrane versus dual‑zone grafting for immediate implant placement in the aesthetic zone
This will test whether a magnesium membrane combined with bovine bone gives better bone and gum volume, improved esthetics, and less pain than dual‑zone grafting for adults receiving immediate implants in the upper front teeth.
-
Labial bone preservation after immediate implant placement using two xenografts in the esthetic zone
This trial will see if two different xenograft materials help preserve the labial bone plate when placing immediate implants in Type II extraction sockets in the upper front jaw.
-
Comparing two types of platelet-rich fibrin for dental implants
This study is testing which of two types of platelet-rich fibrin helps dental implants work better for patients getting immediate implants after losing their back teeth.
-
Comparing xenograft mixed with vitamin D to hyaluronic acid for immediate dental implants
This study tests whether using a mix of vitamin D with a type of bone graft works better than hyaluronic acid for placing immediate dental implants in the back of the jaw.
-
Evaluating Doxycycline Nanoparticles with Gelatin Sponge for Immediate Dental Implants
This study tests if using doxycycline nanoparticles with a gelatin sponge can improve the success of immediate dental implants compared to standard treatment for patients getting implants in the front of their mouth.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.