Microdecompression alone vs. decompression with fusion in adjacent segment stenosis
Official title: Surgical Treatment of Adjacent Segment Stenosis
Run by Charite University, Berlin, Germany · NCT07661199 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial tests whether a less invasive microdecompression can work as well as adding a fusion extension for people with adjacent segment stenosis after prior lumbar fusion.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 338 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Charite University, Berlin, Germany Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Berlin, State of Berlin) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | October 27, 2026 |
| Main results expected | September 30, 2030 |
| Study ends | March 1, 2031 |
| Registry record updated | October 28, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07661199 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults aged 18 and older with symptomatic adjacent segment stenosis after prior lumbar fusion, ODI 30-80%, MRI-confirmed stenosis, and failure of at least 6 weeks of conservative treatment.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with excessive deformity, screw loosening, pseudarthrosis, active spine infection or cancer, or contraindications to spine surgery may not benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This interventional study compares two surgical approaches for symptomatic adjacent segment stenosis after lumbar fusion: microdecompression alone and decompression with extension of fusion. Participants are adults with ODI 30-80% and MRI-confirmed adjacent segment stenosis who have failed at least 6 weeks of conservative care. They are randomly assigned to one of the two procedures and followed for 24 months to assess disability (ODI), complications, reoperations, pain, and radiological progression. The trial is led by Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, evaluating whether the simpler procedure can provide similar outcomes with potentially fewer risks and less surgical burden.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If microdecompression alone is non-inferior, patients may benefit from a less invasive option with shorter recovery and preserved spinal structures.
How similar studies have gone: Previous work in similar spine procedures has shown mixed results; this trial aims to establish non-inferiority for a less invasive approach in this specific setting.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Age ≥18 years. * Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) between 30% and 80% at screening. * Symptomatic adjacent segment stenosis following degenerative lumbar fusion surgery. * Persistent symptoms despite at least 6 weeks of appropriate conservative treatment. * Radiological evidence of adjacent segment spinal stenosis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). * Ability to understand the study procedures and complete patient-reported outcome questionnaires. * Ability to provide written informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: * Adjacent segment kyphosis or scoliosis greater than 10 degrees. * Screw loosening or pseudarthrosis of the previous fusion construct. * Known current pregnancy or breastfeeding. * Acute traumatic spinal injury or fracture. * Active inflammatory disease of the spine. * Active neoplastic disease of the spine. * Contraindication to spinal surgery. * Inability to provide informed consent or complete study questionnaires. * Symptoms attributable to spinal stenosis are not the predominant clinical complaint * Foraminal stenosis grade ≥2 according to the Lee classification. * Dynamic spondylolisthesis ≥3 mm on flexion-extension radiographs. * Persons involuntarily detained by judicial or administrative order.
Where it's running
-
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Berlin, State of Berlin, Germany Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Anton Früh, PD MD M.Sc.
- Email: anton.frueh@charite.de
- Phone: +49 030 450 660 376
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Effect of Irrigation Pressure on Postoperative Complications and Surgical Field Clarity in Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery
This study tests whether the height of the irrigation fluid bag and the direction of the surgical cut affect fluid pressure, visibility, and early recovery in adults undergoing unilateral biportal endoscopic spine surgery.
-
Comparison of two TLIF procedures for single-level lumbar spinal stenosis
This trial tests two minimally invasive TLIF procedures (LUSE-TLIF and MIS-TLIF) to see which better helps people with single-level lumbar spinal stenosis who have not improved with non-surgical treatments.
-
Opioid-free versus opioid-based anesthesia for elective lumbar spine surgery
This test compares opioid-free multimodal anesthesia (with or without an erector spinae plane block) against opioid-containing anesthesia in adults having elective lumbar spine surgery to see which controls pain better and reduces opioid need in the first 48 hours after surgery.
-
Prevalence of PAD in Patients With Surgically Treated Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
This study tests how common peripheral artery disease is in people who have lumbar spinal stenosis and are being considered for, or have had, surgery.
-
Decompressive laminectomy alone versus laminectomy with transpedicular screw fixation for lumbar spinal stenosis
Adults age 30–60 with multilevel lumbar spinal stenosis who haven't improved after six weeks of non-surgical care will be randomly assigned to decompressive laminectomy alone or to laminectomy plus transpedicular screw fixation to see which option relieves pain, improves function, and gives better spinal stability.
-
Dural pulsation in people with lumbar spinal stenosis
This study will see if the presence of dural pulsation on MRI is linked to symptoms and imaging findings in people with lumbar spinal stenosis.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.