Decompressive laminectomy alone versus laminectomy with transpedicular screw fixation for lumbar spinal stenosis

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Surgical Outcomes of Decompressive Laminectomy Versus Decompressive Laminectomy With Transpedicular Screw Fixation in Multilevel Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Early Phase 1 Interventional Punjab Health Care Commission · NCT07281625

Adults age 30–60 with multilevel lumbar spinal stenosis who haven't improved after six weeks of non-surgical care will be randomly assigned to decompressive laminectomy alone or to laminectomy plus transpedicular screw fixation to see which option relieves pain, improves function, and gives better spinal stability.

Quick facts

PhaseEarly Phase 1
Study typeInterventional
Enrollment60 (estimated)
Ages30 Years to 60 Years
SexAll
SponsorPunjab Health Care Commission Academic / other
Locations1 site (Lahore, Punjab Province)
Trial IDNCT07281625 on ClinicalTrials.gov

What this trial studies

This randomized controlled trial will enroll 60 adults aged 30–60 with MRI-confirmed multilevel lumbar spinal stenosis who failed at least six weeks of conservative treatment. Participants will be randomized to decompressive laminectomy alone or decompressive laminectomy with transpedicular screw fixation and followed for postoperative outcomes. Primary measures include operative time, postoperative complications, length of stay, pain by VAS at baseline, day 7 and 3 months, and function by ODI at baseline and 3 months, with radiographs used to assess spinal stability and fusion at 3 months. The single-center trial will be conducted at the Department of Neurosurgery, Services Institute of Medical Sciences in Lahore over a six-month recruitment period.

Who should consider this trial

Good fit: Ideal candidates are adults 30–60 with MRI-confirmed multilevel lumbar spinal stenosis, Pfirrmann grade 3–5 degenerative disc disease, who have failed at least six weeks of conservative treatment and have no prior lumbar surgery or major comorbidities.

Not a fit: Patients with prior lumbar spine surgery, spinal malignancy, congenital deformity or scoliosis/kyphoscoliosis, high-grade spondylolisthesis (grade 3–5), or significant comorbidities such as diabetes or ischemic heart disease are excluded and unlikely to benefit from this trial.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, the trial could identify which surgical approach provides better short-term pain relief, function, and spinal stability and help surgeons reduce complications and future procedures.

How similar studies have performed: Previous randomized and observational studies have reported mixed results, with some selected-patient series suggesting fusion can improve stability or reduce reoperation but other studies showing little clear long-term functional advantage and higher complication rates.

Eligibility criteria

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* Age 30-60 years
* Diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis based on MRI criteria (anteroposterior canal diameter \<10-15 mm or cross-sectional area \<75-145 mm²)
* Multilevel disc herniation
* Degenerative disc disease with Pfirrmann grade 3-5 on T2-weighted MRI
* Failure of at least six weeks of conservative treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

* Previous history of lumbar spine surgery
* Spinal malignancy
* Congenital lumbar spinal stenosis, scoliosis, or kyphoscoliosis
* Lumbar spondylolisthesis grade 3-5
* Significant comorbidities including diabetes mellitus or ischemic heart disease

Where this trial is running

Lahore, Punjab Province

Study contacts

How to participate

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Visit the official trial page on ClinicalTrials.gov for the most current contact information and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the listed study coordinator or principal investigator to request pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Conditions Lumbar Spinal Stenosislaminectomyspinal stenosislumbar fusionVAS pain score
Last reviewed 2026-06-13 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.