Decompressive laminectomy alone versus laminectomy with transpedicular screw fixation for lumbar spinal stenosis
Official title: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Surgical Outcomes of Decompressive Laminectomy Versus Decompressive Laminectomy With Transpedicular Screw Fixation in Multilevel Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Run by Punjab Health Care Commission · NCT07281625 · Data updated 2026-11-12
Adults age 30–60 with multilevel lumbar spinal stenosis who haven't improved after six weeks of non-surgical care will be randomly assigned to decompressive laminectomy alone or to laminectomy plus transpedicular screw fixation to see which option relieves pain, improves function, and gives better spinal stability.
Quick facts
| Phase | Early Phase 1 |
|---|---|
| Study type | Interventional |
| Ages | 30 Years to 60 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 60 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Punjab Health Care Commission Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Lahore, Punjab Province) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | October 1, 2025 |
| Main results expected | December 31, 2025 |
| Study ends | December 31, 2025 |
| Registry record updated | December 15, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT07281625 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults 30–60 with MRI-confirmed multilevel lumbar spinal stenosis, Pfirrmann grade 3–5 degenerative disc disease, who have failed at least six weeks of conservative treatment and have no prior lumbar surgery or major comorbidities.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with prior lumbar spine surgery, spinal malignancy, congenital deformity or scoliosis/kyphoscoliosis, high-grade spondylolisthesis (grade 3–5), or significant comorbidities such as diabetes or ischemic heart disease are excluded and unlikely to benefit from this trial.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This randomized controlled trial will enroll 60 adults aged 30–60 with MRI-confirmed multilevel lumbar spinal stenosis who failed at least six weeks of conservative treatment. Participants will be randomized to decompressive laminectomy alone or decompressive laminectomy with transpedicular screw fixation and followed for postoperative outcomes. Primary measures include operative time, postoperative complications, length of stay, pain by VAS at baseline, day 7 and 3 months, and function by ODI at baseline and 3 months, with radiographs used to assess spinal stability and fusion at 3 months. The single-center trial will be conducted at the Department of Neurosurgery, Services Institute of Medical Sciences in Lahore over a six-month recruitment period.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the trial could identify which surgical approach provides better short-term pain relief, function, and spinal stability and help surgeons reduce complications and future procedures.
How similar studies have gone: Previous randomized and observational studies have reported mixed results, with some selected-patient series suggesting fusion can improve stability or reduce reoperation but other studies showing little clear long-term functional advantage and higher complication rates.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Age 30-60 years * Diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis based on MRI criteria (anteroposterior canal diameter \<10-15 mm or cross-sectional area \<75-145 mm²) * Multilevel disc herniation * Degenerative disc disease with Pfirrmann grade 3-5 on T2-weighted MRI * Failure of at least six weeks of conservative treatment Exclusion Criteria: * Previous history of lumbar spine surgery * Spinal malignancy * Congenital lumbar spinal stenosis, scoliosis, or kyphoscoliosis * Lumbar spondylolisthesis grade 3-5 * Significant comorbidities including diabetes mellitus or ischemic heart disease
Where it's running
-
Services Institute of Medical Sciences
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Hira Umar, MBBS — Sims Siut
- Study coordinator: Hira Umar, MBBS
- Email: quickcareclinicdr03@gmail.com
- Phone: +92 317 4226862
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Effect of Irrigation Pressure on Postoperative Complications and Surgical Field Clarity in Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery
This study tests whether the height of the irrigation fluid bag and the direction of the surgical cut affect fluid pressure, visibility, and early recovery in adults undergoing unilateral biportal endoscopic spine surgery.
-
Microdecompression alone vs. decompression with fusion in adjacent segment stenosis
This trial tests whether a less invasive microdecompression can work as well as adding a fusion extension for people with adjacent segment stenosis after prior lumbar fusion.
-
Comparison of two TLIF procedures for single-level lumbar spinal stenosis
This trial tests two minimally invasive TLIF procedures (LUSE-TLIF and MIS-TLIF) to see which better helps people with single-level lumbar spinal stenosis who have not improved with non-surgical treatments.
-
Opioid-free versus opioid-based anesthesia for elective lumbar spine surgery
This test compares opioid-free multimodal anesthesia (with or without an erector spinae plane block) against opioid-containing anesthesia in adults having elective lumbar spine surgery to see which controls pain better and reduces opioid need in the first 48 hours after surgery.
-
Prevalence of PAD in Patients With Surgically Treated Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
This study tests how common peripheral artery disease is in people who have lumbar spinal stenosis and are being considered for, or have had, surgery.
-
Dural pulsation in people with lumbar spinal stenosis
This study will see if the presence of dural pulsation on MRI is linked to symptoms and imaging findings in people with lumbar spinal stenosis.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.