Opioid-free versus opioid-based anesthesia for elective lumbar spine surgery
Official title: Prospective Comparative Evaluation of Intra-operative and Postoperative Outcomes Associated With Opioid Free Versus Opioid Based Anesthesia Techniques in Patients Undergoing Elective Lumbar Spinal Surgery
Run by Marmara University · NCT07489001 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This test compares opioid-free multimodal anesthesia (with or without an erector spinae plane block) against opioid-containing anesthesia in adults having elective lumbar spine surgery to see which controls pain better and reduces opioid need in the first 48 hours after surgery.
Quick facts
| Study type | Observational |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 75 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 75 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Marmara University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Istanbul, Maltepe) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | December 9, 2025 |
| Main results expected | December 9, 2026 |
| Study ends | December 10, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | March 23, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07489001 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults aged 18–75 scheduled for elective lumbar spinal surgery (stenosis, disc herniation, degenerative spondylolisthesis) with ASA I–III, no prior lumbar surgery, and able to consent and comply with postoperative pain assessments.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with chronic pain syndromes, chronic opioid or gabapentinoid use, significant cardiac or renal disease, BMI >40, pregnancy, or other major exclusion criteria are unlikely to benefit from this protocol.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This is a prospective, observational, non-randomized comparison of three anesthetic approaches used in routine care for adult elective lumbar spine surgery. Patients are assigned to one of three groups based on the attending anesthesiologist's choice: opioid-free multimodal anesthesia (±ESP block), ESP block plus intraoperative opioids, or opioid-based anesthesia without regional blocks. Primary outcomes are postoperative pain scores and opioid consumption in the first 48 hours; secondary outcomes include opioid-related side effects and postoperative complications classified by Clavien-Dindo. Perioperative monitoring such as BIS and ANI are recorded, and standard inclusion/exclusion criteria apply.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this approach could lower postoperative opioid use and reduce opioid-related side effects while maintaining good pain control after lumbar spine surgery.
How similar studies have gone: Prior small trials and case series have suggested opioid-sparing and ESP block strategies can reduce opioid consumption and side effects, but high-quality randomized evidence in lumbar spine surgery remains limited.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Adults aged 18 to 75 years * Elective surgery only * Scheduled for elective lumbar spinal surgery (lumbar spinal stenosis and/or lumbar disc herniation) * ASA physical status I-III * No previous lumbar spine surgery * Able to provide written informed consent * BIS monitoring available and recorded * Ability to comply with postoperative pain assessment (NRS/VAS) * Stable hemodynamic status preoperatively Exclusion Criteria: * Age younger than 18 or older than 75 * Inability or unwillingness to provide informed consent * Severe psychiatric disease or cognitive impairment * Emergency surgery cases * BMI \> 40 kg/m² * Pregnancy * Uncontrolled hypertension, arrhythmia, or severe cardiac disease * Renal failure * Chronic beta-blocker use * Coagulation disorders * Chronic alcohol dependence or substance use * Neurological deficits affecting perception of pain * Chronic pain syndrome (fibromyalgia, chronic LBP \> 3 months) * Chronic gabapentinoid use * Anemia * Known allergy to any anesthetic or analgesic agents used in the study * Local infection at the intended ESP block injection site * Intraoperative change in anesthetic technique that deviates from initial planned management * Pediatric patients (\<18 years)
Where it's running
-
Marmara university hospital
Istanbul, Maltepe, Turkey (Türkiye) Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: burcu Akyüz irfanoğlu, MD — marmara university hospital
- Study coordinator: Burcu Akyüz Irfanoğlu, MD
- Email: brcakyz1@gmail.com
- Phone: 900-555-725-9649
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Effect of Irrigation Pressure on Postoperative Complications and Surgical Field Clarity in Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery
This study tests whether the height of the irrigation fluid bag and the direction of the surgical cut affect fluid pressure, visibility, and early recovery in adults undergoing unilateral biportal endoscopic spine surgery.
-
Acute Effects of Neurodynamics on Hamstrings in Athletes
This study tests whether neurodynamic techniques can help athletes keep or improve hamstring strength and endurance.
-
Microdecompression alone vs. decompression with fusion in adjacent segment stenosis
This trial tests whether a less invasive microdecompression can work as well as adding a fusion extension for people with adjacent segment stenosis after prior lumbar fusion.
-
Comparison of two TLIF procedures for single-level lumbar spinal stenosis
This trial tests two minimally invasive TLIF procedures (LUSE-TLIF and MIS-TLIF) to see which better helps people with single-level lumbar spinal stenosis who have not improved with non-surgical treatments.
-
Prevalence of PAD in Patients With Surgically Treated Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
This study tests how common peripheral artery disease is in people who have lumbar spinal stenosis and are being considered for, or have had, surgery.
-
Finnish comparison of microdiscectomy versus sham surgery for lumbar disc herniation
This trial tests whether microdiscectomy provides better pain relief and recovery than a sham operation for adults with sciatica from a lumbar disc herniation who haven't improved after at least six weeks of non-surgical care.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.