Comparison of two TLIF procedures for single-level lumbar spinal stenosis
Official title: Comparative Analysis of L-Unitary Soft Endoscope Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LUSE-TLIF) Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MIS-TLIF) in the Treatment of Single-Level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis (LSS): A Single-Center, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial
Run by The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University · NCT07588555 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial tests two minimally invasive TLIF procedures (LUSE-TLIF and MIS-TLIF) to see which better helps people with single-level lumbar spinal stenosis who have not improved with non-surgical treatments.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 40 Years to 70 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 276 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University Government |
| Locations | 1 site (Guangzhou, Guangdong) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | March 18, 2026 |
| Main results expected | December 31, 2031 |
| Study ends | December 31, 2031 |
| Registry record updated | May 14, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07588555 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults aged 40–70 with single-level lumbar spinal stenosis and grade II or higher spondylolisthesis or lumbar instability, who have not improved with at least 3 months of non-surgical treatment and are suitable for TLIF.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients without single-level stenosis, with previous lumbar spine surgery, or with exclusionary conditions may not benefit from these TLIF approaches.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This is a prospective, randomized study conducted at a single center to compare two TLIF techniques for treating single-level lumbar spinal stenosis with accompanying instability or spondylolisthesis. Participants aged 40–70 who have persistent leg and/or back pain despite non-surgical care are randomized to receive either LUSE-TLIF or MIS-TLIF. Outcomes focus on safety, fusion success, pain relief, function, and recovery, using standard postoperative assessments over a defined follow-up period. The study aims to determine whether the minimally invasive approach offers advantages in reducing tissue trauma and improving outcomes compared with the alternative TLIF method. Recruitment is limited to patients meeting specific imaging and clinical criteria and who provide informed consent at the enrolling center.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the trial could identify a preferred TLIF technique that provides better pain relief, function, and recovery for patients with single-level LSS.
How similar studies have gone: Previous studies of TLIF approaches have shown comparable safety and varying degrees of benefits; this study builds on that by directly comparing two minimally invasive techniques.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Age ranging from 40 to 70 years, irrespective of sex. * Presence of bilateral lower-limb pain and neurogenic claudication, with or without low back pain. * Preoperative computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging confirming single-level lumbar spinal stenosis accompanied by grade II or higher lumbar spondylolisthesis and/or lumbar instability. * Persistent pain within 7 days prior to enrollment, with inadequate response to nonsurgical treatment for more than 3 months. * Willingness to provide written informed consent and ability to comply with the study protocol and visit schedule. Exclusion Criteria: * Patients with evidence of vascular claudication identified by lower-limb color Doppler ultrasound. * Patients with a history of previous lumbar spine surgery. * Coexistence of severe lumbar disc herniation, spinal deformity, spinal tumor, infection, or inflammatory diseases. * Pregnancy or lactation. * Presence of severe underlying medical conditions or psychiatric disorders that preclude tolerance of the procedure. * Known concurrent diseases considered by the investigator to preclude study entry. * Inability to comply with study assessments or complete questionnaires for any reason. * Patients deemed unsuitable for participation in this trial as judged by the investigator.
Where it's running
-
The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Kaiting Chen, PhD
- Email: 1190011049@smu.edu.cn
- Phone: +86 020-62784332
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Effect of Irrigation Pressure on Postoperative Complications and Surgical Field Clarity in Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery
This study tests whether the height of the irrigation fluid bag and the direction of the surgical cut affect fluid pressure, visibility, and early recovery in adults undergoing unilateral biportal endoscopic spine surgery.
-
Microdecompression alone vs. decompression with fusion in adjacent segment stenosis
This trial tests whether a less invasive microdecompression can work as well as adding a fusion extension for people with adjacent segment stenosis after prior lumbar fusion.
-
Opioid-free versus opioid-based anesthesia for elective lumbar spine surgery
This test compares opioid-free multimodal anesthesia (with or without an erector spinae plane block) against opioid-containing anesthesia in adults having elective lumbar spine surgery to see which controls pain better and reduces opioid need in the first 48 hours after surgery.
-
Prevalence of PAD in Patients With Surgically Treated Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
This study tests how common peripheral artery disease is in people who have lumbar spinal stenosis and are being considered for, or have had, surgery.
-
Decompressive laminectomy alone versus laminectomy with transpedicular screw fixation for lumbar spinal stenosis
Adults age 30–60 with multilevel lumbar spinal stenosis who haven't improved after six weeks of non-surgical care will be randomly assigned to decompressive laminectomy alone or to laminectomy plus transpedicular screw fixation to see which option relieves pain, improves function, and gives better spinal stability.
-
Dural pulsation in people with lumbar spinal stenosis
This study will see if the presence of dural pulsation on MRI is linked to symptoms and imaging findings in people with lumbar spinal stenosis.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.