Early vs. Late Upper Premolar Extraction and Front-Tooth Movement
Official title: Effect of Early vs Late Premolar Extraction on the Rate of Orthodontic Tooth Movement: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Run by Shifa College of Dentistry · NCT07773389 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study tests whether removing the upper first premolars early or late affects how quickly the front teeth move to close the space in teens and young adults needing braces.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 13 Years to 25 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 26 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Shifa College of Dentistry Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Islamabad) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | July 22, 2026 |
| Main results expected | January 2028 |
| Study ends | June 2028 |
| Registry record updated | August 19, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07773389 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are 13–25 years old with symmetric arches, mild to moderate crowding, and a need for bilateral maxillary first premolar extractions.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients not needing extractions or those outside the age range may not benefit from this approach.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This randomized controlled trial compares two timing strategies for extracting the upper first premolars in patients aged 13 to 25 with Class I or Class II malocclusion. Participants will receive fixed orthodontic appliances and bilateral maxillary first premolar extractions, assigned to early extraction (before or within one week of appliance placement) or late extraction (after leveling and alignment but before space closure). Outcomes include the rate of space closure during en-masse anterior retraction, mesial movement of the first molars, gingival cleft formation, extraction ease and duration, and patient-reported pain and anxiety, with assessments at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. Digital models will be used to quantify changes. The trial plans to enroll 26 participants to compare the two timing strategies.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If early or late extraction proves faster or more comfortable, patients could have shorter treatment times or less discomfort.
How similar studies have gone: Prior orthodontic timing studies exist, but results vary; this study aims to clarify the impact of extraction timing on space closure.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age 13-25 years 2. No prior orthodontic treatment 3. Overjet 4-8 mm 4. Symmetric dental arches with mild to moderate crowding requiring bilateral first premolar extractions. 5. Probing depth less than 4 mm on all teeth Exclusion Criteria: 1. History of dental trauma 2. Poor oral hygiene 3. Syndromic patients 4. Systemic diseases or medications affecting bone metabolism
Where it's running
-
Shifa College Of Dentistry
Islamabad, Pakistan Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Shanzay Khan, BDS, Post Graduate Resident
- Email: shanzaykhan1997@gmail.com
- Phone: 03245555716
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Do TPU or PETG clear aligners feel different for teens and young adults?
This study tests whether aligners made from TPU or PETG cause different levels of pain, soreness, and other mouth symptoms in teens and young adults undergoing clear aligner treatment.
-
Maxillary Arch Distalization Using Infrazygomatic Crest Miniscrews for Class II Malocclusion
This study tests if moving the upper dental arch backward with infrazygomatic crest miniscrews safely corrects Class II malocclusion without extra patient cooperation.
-
Custom-made versus ready-made Carriere Motion appliance for correcting Class II bite
This study will test whether a custom-made Carriere Motion appliance works better than a ready-made version to correct Class II malocclusion in 12–15-year-olds with permanent teeth.
-
3D-printed fixed twin block versus MARA to help correct an underdeveloped lower jaw in Class II malocclusion
This research will test whether a CAD/CAM 3D-printed fixed twin block or a MARA appliance better improves dental alignment and jaw relationships in preadolescents with Class II due to a small lower jaw.
-
Distalizing upper first and second molars with a palate miniscrew device versus clear aligners
This trial will test whether a miniscrew‑supported palate device (AMDA®) or clear aligners with Class II elastics moves upper first and second molars back more effectively in people with bilateral Class II malocclusion who need molar distalization.
-
Using Invisalign with special blocks for jaw advancement
This study tests if using special blocks with Invisalign can help people with jaw alignment issues feel more comfortable and improve their dental health.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.