Distalizing upper first and second molars with a palate miniscrew device versus clear aligners
Official title: Comparison of Distalization of Maxillary First and Second Molars Between a Miniscrew Implant Supported Device and Clear Aligners: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Run by Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki · NCT07040176 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial will test whether a miniscrew‑supported palate device (AMDA®) or clear aligners with Class II elastics moves upper first and second molars back more effectively in people with bilateral Class II malocclusion who need molar distalization.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | Any age to 30 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 40 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Thessaloniki) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | April 10, 2024 |
| Main results expected | April 2027 |
| Study ends | April 2028 |
| Registry record updated | June 27, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT07040176 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are patients under 30 in permanent dentition with at least half cusp bilateral Class II due to maxillary excess or posterior maxillary proclination, with erupted second molars and good general and periodontal health.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients whose Class II is caused by mandibular deficiency or retrusion, unilateral Class II, craniofacial syndromes (like cleft), missing or heavily restored molars, or poor periodontal health are unlikely to benefit from these distalization approaches.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
Adults and late adolescents with bilateral Class II malocclusion will be randomly assigned to either a miniscrew‑supported palatal device (AMDA®) or clear aligners (Spark®) with Class II elastics for upper molar distalization. Lateral cephalometric X‑rays and 3D intraoral scans will be taken before treatment, at the end of active distalization, and at treatment completion; CBCT scans will be taken for patients in the AMDA group at specified time points. Primary comparisons include amount of molar distalization and anchorage loss, while secondary analyses will compare movements of premolars, canines, and incisors in three planes and treatment duration. Results will show whether one approach achieves the planned Class I molar relationship with different side effects or time requirements.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the results could help choose the method that achieves reliable upper molar distalization with less unwanted tooth movement or shorter overall treatment.
How similar studies have gone: Both miniscrew‑anchored distalization and aligner‑based distalization with elastics have shown success in prior orthodontic reports, but direct randomized head‑to‑head comparisons are limited.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients with at least half cusp bilateral Class II malocclusion between upper and lower first molars due to maxillary excess or maxillary protrusion or forward movement of the maxillary posterior teeth, where maxillary molar distalization is indicated. * Patients in the permanent dentition period of less than 30 years of age with second molars erupted at least one half. * Patients with good general health and healthy periodontium. Exclusion Criteria: * Patients with Class II malocclusion between upper and lower first molars due to mandibular deficiency or mandibular retrusion. * Patients with less than half cusp bilateral Class II malocclusion between upper and lower first molars. * Patients with unilateral Class II malocclusion between upper and lower first molars. * Patients with cleft lip and palate or with other craniofacial syndromes. * Patients with missing, or congenital missing or supernumerary teeth. * Patients with full coverage molar restorations. * Patients with previous orthodontic treatment.
Where it's running
-
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, School of Medical Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Thessaloniki, Greece Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Aikaterini Samandara, Doctor of Dental Surgery
- Email: katerinasamandara@gmail.com
- Phone: +306945299800
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Maxillary Arch Distalization Using Infrazygomatic Crest Miniscrews for Class II Malocclusion
This study tests if moving the upper dental arch backward with infrazygomatic crest miniscrews safely corrects Class II malocclusion without extra patient cooperation.
-
Custom-made versus ready-made Carriere Motion appliance for correcting Class II bite
This study will test whether a custom-made Carriere Motion appliance works better than a ready-made version to correct Class II malocclusion in 12–15-year-olds with permanent teeth.
-
3D-printed fixed twin block versus MARA to help correct an underdeveloped lower jaw in Class II malocclusion
This research will test whether a CAD/CAM 3D-printed fixed twin block or a MARA appliance better improves dental alignment and jaw relationships in preadolescents with Class II due to a small lower jaw.
-
3D-printed miniscrew-supported device to move upper molars backward
This tests a new 3D-printed miniscrew-supported device against a conventional miniscrew distal-jet to move upper molars back in people with bilateral Class II molar relationships and upper-arch crowding.
-
Using Invisalign with special blocks for jaw advancement
This study tests if using special blocks with Invisalign can help people with jaw alignment issues feel more comfortable and improve their dental health.
-
Comparing clear aligners and fixed braces for treating mild Class II malocclusion in adults
This study is testing whether clear aligners or traditional braces work better for adults with mild Class II malocclusion to improve their teeth and bite.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.