Comparing one-piece and two-piece ceramic dental implants for tooth loss
Official title: 5-Years Multicentric Prospective Post-Market Clinical Follow-up (PMCF) Comparative Study of CeraRoot Ceramic Dental Implants One-piece Versus Two-piece.
Run by CeraRoot SL · NCT06287346 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing whether one-piece or two-piece ceramic dental implants work better for adults with missing teeth and if there are any problems with each type.
Quick facts
| Study type | Observational |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 652 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | CeraRoot SL Industry-sponsored |
| Locations | 2 sites (Boulder, Colorado and 1 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | January 1, 2024 |
| Main results expected | January 1, 2029 |
| Study ends | January 1, 2030 |
| Registry record updated | March 1, 2024 |
| Trial ID | NCT06287346 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates include fully-grown patients with partial or total edentulism, especially those with metal allergies.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with significant health issues, poor oral hygiene, or contraindications for surgery may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This observational study aims to evaluate the survival rates of one-piece versus two-piece ceramic dental implants in patients with missing or hopeless teeth. It will assess the performance of various CeraRoot ceramic implant models and identify any complications associated with each type. The study will involve patients from two dental centers located in Barcelona, Spain, and Boulder, Colorado, USA. Participants will be fully-grown individuals requiring dental reconstruction and who have no contraindications, particularly those with metal allergies.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could provide insights into the most effective type of ceramic dental implant, improving outcomes for patients with tooth loss.
How similar studies have gone: While there have been studies on dental implants, this specific comparison of one-piece versus two-piece ceramic implants is relatively novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Clinical Diagnosis of partial or total edentulism. * Specially indicated for patients with metal allergies and chronic illness due to metal allergies. Exclusion Criteria: 1. General Contraindications: 1. Local and Systemic contraindications for surgery. 2. Poor oral hygiene 3. Patients with health problems, disease or any physical or psychological condition to which an oral surgery may be contraindicated. 2. Relative Contraindications: 1. Previously irradiated bone 2. diabetes 3. anticoagulant medication 4. hemodynamic problems 5. bruxism 6. Para functional habits 7. bad bone anatomy 8. smokers 9. none controlled periodontitis 10. malocclusions 11. TMJ problems 12. diseases in the oral cavity 13. pregnancy 14. insufficient oral hygiene for adequate health. 3. Local contraindications 1. insufficient bone quantity or quality 2. remaining of roots 3. localized periodontal disease 4. Any pathology in the neighboring teeth.
Where it's running
-
Family Holistic Dentistry
Boulder, Colorado, United States Recruiting -
CeraRoot CLINIC
Les Franqueses del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: JOSEP Oliva, Dentist, DDS MSC
- Email: josep.oliva@cerarootclinic.com
- Phone: 800-485-1613
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Biodontoss and DWC dental implants and superstructures in adults needing tooth replacement
This PMCF study tests whether BIODENTOSS and DWC dental implants and their superstructures are safe and effective for adults with tooth loss over 24 months.
-
Dental Abutments With Different Surfaces in Two-Unit Implant Bridges
This study tests whether two different abutment surface types affect outcomes for people needing two-implant-supported, two-unit bridges in the back of the mouth.
-
Accuracy of the Calibrated Framework for Full-Arch Implant Impressions in Edentulous Patients
This study tests whether digital scanning with a calibrated framework can match the accuracy of traditional splinted impressions for full-arch dental implants in completely toothless patients.
-
Effect of four post-extraction socket approaches on preserving the ridge after tooth removal
This study tests four ways to care for an extraction socket to see which best preserves the jawbone and gum after tooth removal for future implants.
-
Immediate molar implants with customized healing abutments in different socket classes
This study tests placing an implant right after extracting a back tooth and using a custom healing cap to shape the gum from day one, in people needing posterior implants.
-
Use of enamel matrix derivative with immediate implants in the lower back teeth
This trial tests whether applying enamel matrix derivative at the time of immediate mandibular molar implants helps osseointegration and healing.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.