Accuracy of the Calibrated Framework for Full-Arch Implant Impressions in Edentulous Patients
Official title: Accuracy of the Calibrated Framework for Intraoral Full-Arch Scanning Compared With Conventional Splinted Open-Tray Impression in Edentulous Patients: A Crossover Clinical Trial
Run by Mansoura University · NCT07858682 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study tests whether digital scanning with a calibrated framework can match the accuracy of traditional splinted impressions for full-arch dental implants in completely toothless patients.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 35 Years to 60 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 20 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Mansoura University Academic / other |
| Drugs / interventions | chemotherapy |
| Locations | 1 site (Al Mansurah) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | January 1, 2026 |
| Main results expected | February 1, 2027 |
| Study ends | April 1, 2027 |
| Registry record updated | October 5, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07858682 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults 18 years or older who are completely edentulous in the maxilla and mandible, have sufficient bone and interarch space, good oral hygiene, and no uncontrolled systemic diseases.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with poor saliva management, severe parafunctions, or conditions compromising implant accuracy may not experience benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
In this crossover study, researchers compare two implant impression methods in adults who are fully edentulous: a conventional splinted open-tray impression and an intraoral digital scan using a calibrated framework. Each participant receives both techniques after implant placement, enabling within-subject comparison of accuracy. The resulting STL files will be superimposed to evaluate how well each method transfers implant positions and supports a passive prosthetic fit. The goal is to determine if digital scanning with a calibrated framework can provide comparable or superior accuracy while potentially reducing technique sensitivity and time. This work addresses the risk of misfit-related complications in full-arch implant rehabilitation.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, patients could benefit from faster, potentially safer, and more convenient impression methods with reliable prosthetic fit.
How similar studies have gone: Previous work suggests digital scanning approaches can approach the accuracy of conventional methods, but direct evidence in complete-arch edentulous cases with a calibrated framework is limited and this study provides new comparative data.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Adults aged 18 years or older. * Completely edentulous maxilla and mandible for at least 6 months following the last tooth extraction. * Angle's Class I maxillomandibular relationship with adequate interarch space. * Sufficient residual alveolar bone quantity and quality to receive dental implants. * Good oral hygiene. * Free from uncontrolled systemic diseases or conditions that may interfere with implant osseointegration. * Able and willing to provide written informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: * Temporomandibular joint disorders or parafunctional habits. * Heavy smokers. * Uncontrolled systemic diseases. * History of chemotherapy or radiotherapy to the head and neck region. * Poor neuromuscular coordination. * Localized bone defects that could compromise implant placement.
Where it's running
-
Noor Alhuda Rahemm Khalil
Al Mansurah, Egypt Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: noor alhuda raheem, BDS
- Email: nooralkhalil95@yahoo.com
- Phone: 01044487126
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Healing after dental implant placement in patients using TNF-alpha inhibitors
This study is testing how well dental implants heal in patients taking TNF-alpha inhibitors compared to those who aren't, to see if there are any differences in complications and pain after the procedure.
-
Dental Abutments With Different Surfaces in Two-Unit Implant Bridges
This study tests whether two different abutment surface types affect outcomes for people needing two-implant-supported, two-unit bridges in the back of the mouth.
-
Graftless Periosteal Coverage vs Xenogenic Graft for Jumping Gap in Immediate Mandibular Molar Implants
This study tests whether graftless periosteal coverage can perform as well as a xenogenic bone graft beneath a collagen membrane for managing a jumping gap in immediate mandibular molar implants.
-
Passive Fit of Implant-Supported Frameworks Using Digital vs Conventional Impressions
This study tests whether three impression methods can produce a passively fitting full-arch mandibular implant framework for edentulous patients.
-
Comparison of Non-Calibrated Splinting Scan Bodies and a T-Marker for Full-Arch Implant Scanning
Researchers are testing two digital methods to record implant positions for full-arch implant-supported prostheses in fully edentulous patients to see which is faster and more accurate.
-
Digital jaw tracking for full-arch maxillary implant restorations
This randomized trial tests whether using digital jaw tracking to guide the fabrication of full-arch maxillary implant-supported prostheses improves occlusal accuracy and patient satisfaction compared with a conventional workflow.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.