3D printed reverse twin block to treat Class III malocclusion in growing kids
Official title: Effectiveness of a Novel 3D Printed Reverse Twin Block in The Management of Maxillary Deficiency of Class III Malocclusion: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Run by University of Baghdad · NCT07710391 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial tests whether a 3D-printed reverse twin block can better correct maxillary deficiency in children with Class III alignment compared with the conventional appliance over six months.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 8 Years to 13 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 30 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | University of Baghdad Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Baghdad) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | June 10, 2026 |
| Main results expected | December 31, 2026 |
| Study ends | June 30, 2027 |
| Registry record updated | July 21, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07710391 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Growing children aged 8–13 with mixed dentition, residual maxillary growth, and Class III tendency with anterior crossbite or reverse overjet are ideal candidates.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients without remaining maxillary growth or without a Class III pattern may see limited to no benefit from the 3DRTB.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This randomized controlled trial compares a novel 3D printed reverse twin block (3DRTB) with the conventional reverse twin block (CRTB) for correcting sagittal discrepancies due to maxillary deficiency in growing patients with Class III malocclusion. Participants are 8- to 13-year-olds with mixed dentition and remaining maxillary growth, assigned to either 3DRTB or CRTB for a 6-month treatment period. Outcomes include sagittal, transverse, and vertical jaw relationships, soft tissue profile, incisor inclination, patient perception via questionnaire, and oral hygiene impact. Primary focus is the effectiveness of 3DRTB in improving sagittal discrepancy; secondary aims cover morphology, aesthetics, and patient-reported experience. The study uses cephalometric criteria and clinical assessments to compare the two appliances.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the 3DRTB could provide a more effective, patient-friendly option for correcting Class III malocclusion in growing children.
How similar studies have gone: Prior work with reverse twin blocks shows benefit for similar conditions, but this specific 3D-printed approach is being tested for added effectiveness and patient experience.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1. The age group selected is mixed dentition group 8-13 years with residual potential maxillary growth. Patient maturity will be assessed using the Cervical Vertebral Maturation (CVM) method on lateral cephalogram, patients in CS1-CS3 stages will be included to ensure remaining maxillary growth. 2. Presence of permanent first molar with lower anterior teeth to retain the appliance. 3. Skeletal/dental class III tendency with anterior cross bite or reverse overjet: a. Clinically the overjet is equal or less than zero up to -3 mm. b. Cephalometric ANB angle equal or less than zero up to -3 degrees and Wits appraisal ≤ -2. 4. Prescence of unilateral or bilateral posterior crossbite. 5. Mild to moderate anterior crowding. 6. Acceptable oral hygiene baseline defined by oral hygiene index (OHI). - Exclusion Criteria: 1. Patients with cleft lip and palate and/or craniofacial anomalies. 2. History of previous orthopedic and/or orthodontic treatment. 3. Presence of uncontrolled systemic disease or medically compromised status. 4. Uncooperative patient/parents.
Where it's running
-
Collage of Dentistry, University of Baghdad
Baghdad, Iraq Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Linda Basim, PhD
- Email: landa.hadi2403@codental.uobaghdad.edu.iq
- Phone: +9647812867005
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Maxillary Arch Distalization Using Infrazygomatic Crest Miniscrews for Class II Malocclusion
This study tests if moving the upper dental arch backward with infrazygomatic crest miniscrews safely corrects Class II malocclusion without extra patient cooperation.
-
Custom-made versus ready-made Carriere Motion appliance for correcting Class II bite
This study will test whether a custom-made Carriere Motion appliance works better than a ready-made version to correct Class II malocclusion in 12–15-year-olds with permanent teeth.
-
3D-printed fixed twin block versus MARA to help correct an underdeveloped lower jaw in Class II malocclusion
This research will test whether a CAD/CAM 3D-printed fixed twin block or a MARA appliance better improves dental alignment and jaw relationships in preadolescents with Class II due to a small lower jaw.
-
Distalizing upper first and second molars with a palate miniscrew device versus clear aligners
This trial will test whether a miniscrew‑supported palate device (AMDA®) or clear aligners with Class II elastics moves upper first and second molars back more effectively in people with bilateral Class II malocclusion who need molar distalization.
-
Using Invisalign with special blocks for jaw advancement
This study tests if using special blocks with Invisalign can help people with jaw alignment issues feel more comfortable and improve their dental health.
-
Comparing clear aligners and fixed braces for treating mild Class II malocclusion in adults
This study is testing whether clear aligners or traditional braces work better for adults with mild Class II malocclusion to improve their teeth and bite.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.