Video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for initial tracheal intubation in children
Official title: Videolaryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Tracheal Intubation in Pediatric Surgery: The VIDEOKIDS Pragmatic Multicentre Randomized Trial
Run by Hospital Clinico Universitario de Santiago · NCT07495436 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial tests whether using a video laryngoscope on the first try helps doctors successfully place a breathing tube in children undergoing surgery more often than a direct laryngoscope.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 0 Days to 16 Hours |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 5562 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Hospital Clinico Universitario de Santiago Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Santiago de Compostela, A CORUÑA) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | June 1, 2026 |
| Main results expected | December 30, 2027 |
| Study ends | December 30, 2027 |
| Registry record updated | September 21, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07495436 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Pediatric patients aged 0–16 years undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia requiring orotracheal intubation, with initial technique planned as videolaryngoscopy or direct laryngoscopy.
✕Probably not a fit
Children with emergent intubations, known airway abnormalities requiring a specific technique, or guardians who decline participation may not benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This is a large international, multicenter, randomized trial comparing videolaryngoscopy to direct laryngoscopy as the initial technique for tracheal intubation in pediatric patients under general anesthesia. Children aged 0 to 16 years requiring planned orotracheal intubation are randomized 1:1 to the two approaches, with peri‑intubation management left to local practice. The primary outcome is first‑attempt intubation success; secondary outcomes include time to intubation, number of attempts, glottic view, need for adjunct devices, and related complications. An intention‑to‑treat analysis with mixed‑effects logistic regression will account for center variability. Current pediatric evidence is inconclusive about first‑attempt success despite better glottic visualization with videolaryngoscopy.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If videolaryngoscopy proves superior, it could reduce the need for multiple intubation attempts and lower complication risks in pediatric anesthesia.
How similar studies have gone: Previous meta-analyses in children have shown inconsistent improvements in first‑attempt success, so results remain uncertain but potentially practice‑changing.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Paediatric patients (age 0-16 years), * Undergoing elective or scheduled surgery under general anaesthesia requiring orotracheal intubation, * Planned tracheal intubation using either videolaryngoscopy or direct laryngoscopy as the initial technique, * Informed or general consent given, according to the relevant ethics committee statement,. Exclusion Criteria: * Known upper airway anatomical abnormalities or clinical conditions requiring a specific intubation technique (e.g., fibreoptic intubation), * Requirement for emergent tracheal intubation that does not allow adequate randomisation, * Refusal of parents or legal guardians to participate in the study.
Where it's running
-
Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela
Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Manuel Taboada Muñiz — University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela
- Study coordinator: Manuel Taboada Muñiz, Ph.D.
- Email: manutabo@yahoo.es
- Phone: +34678195618
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Hyperangulated vs. Macintosh blades for obstetric intubation
This study tests whether a hyperangulated blade or a Macintosh-style blade helps obstetric patients get an endotracheal tube placement more safely during cesarean deliveries under general anesthesia.
-
Pain monitoring with ANI during rapid sequence induction
This study tests whether the Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) can measure pain during rapid sequence induction in adults undergoing tracheal intubation.
-
Frontal EEG Changes During Anesthesia in People With Obesity vs. Normal Weight
This study tests whether frontal brain activity patterns during anesthesia differ between adults with obesity and those of normal weight.
-
Remimazolam versus Midazolam for anesthesia induction in older adults
This observational study compares remimazolam and midazolam when inducing anesthesia in people aged 65 and older undergoing elective non-cardiac surgery to see which provides better stability and safety.
-
Dexmedetomidine vs magnesium with lidocaine for eye block during DCR surgery
This trial tests whether adding dexmedetomidine or magnesium sulfate to lidocaine for a preemptive peribulbar block can better manage blood pressure and heart rate in adults undergoing DCR surgery under general anesthesia.
-
Sphenopalatine ganglion block to improve the surgical field during endoscopic pituitary removal
This trial will try an ultrasound-guided sphenopalatine ganglion block with bupivacaine and dexamethasone alongside general anesthesia to see if it improves the surgeon's view and reduces postoperative pain for adults aged 21–60 having endoscopic trans-nasal pituitary surgery.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.