Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Interventional Ages 0 Days to 16 Hours

Video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for initial tracheal intubation in children

Official title: Videolaryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Tracheal Intubation in Pediatric Surgery: The VIDEOKIDS Pragmatic Multicentre Randomized Trial

Run by Hospital Clinico Universitario de Santiago · NCT07495436 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This trial tests whether using a video laryngoscope on the first try helps doctors successfully place a breathing tube in children undergoing surgery more often than a direct laryngoscope.

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
Ages0 Days to 16 Hours
SexAll
Enrollment5562 (estimated)
SponsorHospital Clinico Universitario de Santiago
Academic / other
Locations1 site (Santiago de Compostela, A CORUÑA)
StatusRecruiting
StartedJune 1, 2026
Main results expectedDecember 30, 2027
Study endsDecember 30, 2027
Registry record updatedSeptember 21, 2026
Trial IDNCT07495436 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Pediatric patients aged 0–16 years undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia requiring orotracheal intubation, with initial technique planned as videolaryngoscopy or direct laryngoscopy.

Probably not a fit

Children with emergent intubations, known airway abnormalities requiring a specific technique, or guardians who decline participation may not benefit.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This is a large international, multicenter, randomized trial comparing videolaryngoscopy to direct laryngoscopy as the initial technique for tracheal intubation in pediatric patients under general anesthesia. Children aged 0 to 16 years requiring planned orotracheal intubation are randomized 1:1 to the two approaches, with peri‑intubation management left to local practice. The primary outcome is first‑attempt intubation success; secondary outcomes include time to intubation, number of attempts, glottic view, need for adjunct devices, and related complications. An intention‑to‑treat analysis with mixed‑effects logistic regression will account for center variability. Current pediatric evidence is inconclusive about first‑attempt success despite better glottic visualization with videolaryngoscopy.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If videolaryngoscopy proves superior, it could reduce the need for multiple intubation attempts and lower complication risks in pediatric anesthesia.

How similar studies have gone: Previous meta-analyses in children have shown inconsistent improvements in first‑attempt success, so results remain uncertain but potentially practice‑changing.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* Paediatric patients (age 0-16 years),
* Undergoing elective or scheduled surgery under general anaesthesia requiring orotracheal intubation,
* Planned tracheal intubation using either videolaryngoscopy or direct laryngoscopy as the initial technique,
* Informed or general consent given, according to the relevant ethics committee statement,.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Known upper airway anatomical abnormalities or clinical conditions requiring a specific intubation technique (e.g., fibreoptic intubation),
* Requirement for emergent tracheal intubation that does not allow adequate randomisation,
* Refusal of parents or legal guardians to participate in the study.

Where it's running

  • Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela
    Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain
    Recruiting

Study contacts

  • Principal investigator: Manuel Taboada Muñiz — University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela
  • Study coordinator: Manuel Taboada Muñiz, Ph.D.
  • Email: manutabo@yahoo.es
  • Phone: +34678195618

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.