Understanding how often and why a patient’s breathing and the ventilator don’t stay in sync
Official title: Unraveling the Clinical Impact of Patient-Ventilator Asynchrony in Usual Care
Run by Erasmus Medical Center · NCT07624786 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study tests how often patient-ventilator asynchrony occurs in mechanically ventilated adults and how it relates to their health and outcomes.
Quick facts
| Study type | Observational |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 110 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Erasmus Medical Center Academic / other |
| Locations | 3 sites (Eindhoven, North Brabant and 2 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | July 21, 2026 |
| Main results expected | November 2026 |
| Study ends | February 2027 |
| Registry record updated | August 13, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07624786 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults (>18) who have invasive mechanical ventilation with available ventilator waveform data linked to electronic health records for at least 24 hours.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients without adequate waveform data or those not receiving invasive mechanical ventilation for the required duration may not benefit from this analysis.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This is an observational study using data from patients on invasive mechanical ventilation to measure the frequency of patient-ventilator asynchrony (PVA) with an AI-based Deep Breath software. Researchers will analyze waveform data offline to classify PVA types and examine associations with clinical characteristics and outcomes such as mortality, ventilator-free days, and weaning success. The study includes data from at least 110 patients across three ICUs to improve generalizability. The primary outcome is the overall and type-specific asynchrony index over time, with several secondary outcomes related to patient status and recovery.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the findings could improve understanding of PVA patterns and help guide strategies to reduce asynchrony and improve ventilation outcomes.
How similar studies have gone: Prior work validated an AI-based algorithm for detecting PVA, and this study applies it to real-world data to examine associations with outcomes.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Age \> 18 years old. * Recordings available of ventilator waveforms synchronized with the patient's electronic health record during invasive mechanical ventilation. * Duration of mechanical ventilation of at least 24 hours. Exclusion Criteria: * (Previous) registered objection of patient and/or relatives to re-use clinical data for research purposes * No consent for re-use of data for research
Where it's running
-
Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven (CZE)
Eindhoven, North Brabant, Netherlands Recruiting -
Erasmus Medical Center (EMC)
Rotterdam, South Holland, Netherlands Recruiting -
Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Leiden, South Holland, Netherlands Not yet recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Annemijn Jonkman, PhD
- Email: a.jonkman@erasmusmc.nl
- Phone: +3110-7035142
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Pulse Wave vs Saline Bolus EIT to measure lung perfusion in ARDS
This study tests whether pulse wave EIT or saline bolus EIT can best show lung blood flow in ARDS patients on mechanical ventilation.
-
Computed inspiratory muscle pressure to monitor inspiratory effort during pressure-targeted assist/control ventilation
This study tests a noninvasive computed pressure method (cPmus) to see if it matches the traditional esophageal pressure method for measuring inspiratory effort in adults on pressure-targeted ventilation with spontaneous breathing.
-
Noninvasive estimate of inspiratory effort to monitor pressure support ventilation
This study tests whether a noninvasive computed inspiratory muscle pressure (cPmus) can match the traditional esophageal pressure method for adults on pressure support ventilation.
-
Driving pressure-guided individualized PEEP vs standard PEEP during upper abdominal surgery
In this randomized trial, adults at higher risk of breathing problems after upper abdominal surgery will try a personalized PEEP level based on the lowest driving pressure and compare it to a fixed PEEP of 5 cmH2O to see if it lowers postoperative lung complications.
-
Inspiratory Effort and Dyspnea During Assisted Mechanical Ventilation in Critically Ill Adults
This study tests how different patient breathing efforts relate to breathlessness in adults on assisted mechanical ventilation.
-
FCV vs VC—Obese Adults Undergoing Laparoscopic Surgery
In obese adults having laparoscopic surgery, researchers will see if flow-controlled ventilation (FCV) works better than volume-controlled ventilation with autoflow (VC-AF) at keeping airway pressures and lung energy lower.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.