Ultrasound vs CT calcium scoring to reclassify symptomatic chest pain
Official title: Carotid Ultrasound Vs Computed Tomography (CT) Coronary Calcium Scoring to Reclassify Symptomatic Patients With Suspected Chronic Coronary Syndrome Using Risk Factor Clinical Likelihood for Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease
Run by London North West Healthcare NHS Trust · NCT07696533 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study tests whether carotid ultrasound can reclassify risk in adults with chest pain and suspected chronic coronary syndrome, compared with the CT calcium score.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 225 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | London North West Healthcare NHS Trust Academic / other |
| Drugs / interventions | radiation |
| Locations | 1 site (Harrow) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | July 3, 2026 |
| Main results expected | November 30, 2027 |
| Study ends | November 30, 2032 |
| Registry record updated | July 15, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07696533 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults with chest pain and suspected chronic coronary syndrome who are deemed to need CTCA with CAC scoring and have a risk estimate of 5-15% according to ESC guidelines.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with high-risk features or established CAD may not see benefit from replacing CT with carotid ultrasound.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
In people with chest pain and suspected chronic coronary syndrome, current first-line testing often uses CT coronary calcium scoring to rule out obstructive disease, but this imaging involves radiation. The study investigates whether a carotid ultrasound, a radiation-free and quicker test, provides similar reclassification of risk when compared with CT calcium scoring. Participants will have one neck ultrasound visit and their results will be compared to their heart CT calcium score results to see how well they align. The aim is to determine if ultrasound could safely reduce reliance on CT-based testing in low-to-intermediate risk patients. This could help guide diagnostic pathways and resource use for suspected coronary disease.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, patients could avoid unnecessary radiation exposure and simplify testing by using ultrasound as an alternative to CT calcium scoring.
How similar studies have gone: Prior evidence supports carotid ultrasound as a surrogate marker for cardiovascular risk, but direct reclassification against CTCAC in this setting is being explored.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age \> 18 years old 2. Symptomatic patients with suspected CCS, judged by the clinician to require CTCA with CAC scoring, for the diagnosis of CAD 3. Have a RF-CL 5-15%, as calculated using ESC guidelines 4. Able to give informed consent to participate in the study and its follow up Exclusion Criteria: 1. Age \<18 years old 2. Diagnosed ACS requiring hospitalization or urgent or emergent testing 3. Known CAD with prior MI, PCI, CABG or any angiographic evidence of CAD (≥50% lesion in a major epicardial vessel) 4. History of previous stroke or known peripheral vascular disease 5. Known significant cardiac congenital abnormalities 6. Pregnancy 7. Life expectancy \< 1 years 8. Unable to provide written informed consent
Where it's running
-
Northwick Park Hospital
Harrow, United Kingdom Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Emma Howard
- Email: lnwh-tr.cardiacresearch@nhs.net
- Phone: +4402088692548
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Common femoral vein-to-artery diameter ratio to detect elevated LVEDP
Researchers test whether the ratio of the common femoral vein to artery diameters, measured by ultrasound, can flag elevated LV end-diastolic pressure in patients having coronary angiography.
-
Exercise ECG to tell hypertensive heart disease from obstructive CAD
This study tests whether exercise ECG can distinguish heart problems caused by high blood pressure from those caused by obstructive coronary artery disease in patients being evaluated for chest pain.
-
Aspirin 50 mg vs 100 mg with a P2Y12 inhibitor after PCI
This trial tests whether a 50 mg daily aspirin dose, when used with a P2Y12 inhibitor after PCI, works as well as 100 mg with similar safety for people staying on DAPT for 12 months.
-
See if stopping long-term aspirin is as good as continuing it in older adults with stable ischemic heart disease
In adults 65 and older with stable ischemic heart disease, this trial tests whether stopping daily low-dose aspirin is not worse than continuing it.
-
IVUS-Guided Left Main Stenting: IVUS-Guided vs Trained-Eye Approach
This trial tests whether using IVUS to guide left main bifurcation stenting is as good as using an angiography-driven, experience-based approach by an IVUS-savvy operator.
-
Can CZT-SPECT/CT quantify myocardial tracer uptake to match PET measurements in coronary artery disease?
This study tests whether CZT-SPECT/CT can quantify heart blood flow at rest and stress and see if the results align with PET measurements for people with coronary artery disease.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.