Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Interventional Ages 18 and up

Ultrasound vs CT calcium scoring to reclassify symptomatic chest pain

Official title: Carotid Ultrasound Vs Computed Tomography (CT) Coronary Calcium Scoring to Reclassify Symptomatic Patients With Suspected Chronic Coronary Syndrome Using Risk Factor Clinical Likelihood for Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Run by London North West Healthcare NHS Trust · NCT07696533 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This study tests whether carotid ultrasound can reclassify risk in adults with chest pain and suspected chronic coronary syndrome, compared with the CT calcium score.

More Chronic Coronary Syndrome trials

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
Ages18 Years and up
SexAll
Enrollment225 (estimated)
SponsorLondon North West Healthcare NHS Trust
Academic / other
Drugs / interventionsradiation
Locations1 site (Harrow)
StatusRecruiting
StartedJuly 3, 2026
Main results expectedNovember 30, 2027
Study endsNovember 30, 2032
Registry record updatedJuly 15, 2026
Trial IDNCT07696533 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Adults with chest pain and suspected chronic coronary syndrome who are deemed to need CTCA with CAC scoring and have a risk estimate of 5-15% according to ESC guidelines.

Probably not a fit

Patients with high-risk features or established CAD may not see benefit from replacing CT with carotid ultrasound.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

In people with chest pain and suspected chronic coronary syndrome, current first-line testing often uses CT coronary calcium scoring to rule out obstructive disease, but this imaging involves radiation. The study investigates whether a carotid ultrasound, a radiation-free and quicker test, provides similar reclassification of risk when compared with CT calcium scoring. Participants will have one neck ultrasound visit and their results will be compared to their heart CT calcium score results to see how well they align. The aim is to determine if ultrasound could safely reduce reliance on CT-based testing in low-to-intermediate risk patients. This could help guide diagnostic pathways and resource use for suspected coronary disease.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, patients could avoid unnecessary radiation exposure and simplify testing by using ultrasound as an alternative to CT calcium scoring.

How similar studies have gone: Prior evidence supports carotid ultrasound as a surrogate marker for cardiovascular risk, but direct reclassification against CTCAC in this setting is being explored.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

1. Age \> 18 years old
2. Symptomatic patients with suspected CCS, judged by the clinician to require CTCA with CAC scoring, for the diagnosis of CAD
3. Have a RF-CL 5-15%, as calculated using ESC guidelines
4. Able to give informed consent to participate in the study and its follow up

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Age \<18 years old
2. Diagnosed ACS requiring hospitalization or urgent or emergent testing
3. Known CAD with prior MI, PCI, CABG or any angiographic evidence of CAD (≥50% lesion in a major epicardial vessel)
4. History of previous stroke or known peripheral vascular disease
5. Known significant cardiac congenital abnormalities
6. Pregnancy
7. Life expectancy \< 1 years
8. Unable to provide written informed consent

Where it's running

  • Northwick Park Hospital
    Harrow, United Kingdom
    Recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.