IVUS-Guided Left Main Stenting: IVUS-Guided vs Trained-Eye Approach
Official title: "IVUS-Trained Eye" vs. Intravascular Ultrasound in Left Main Bifurcation Stenting: A Prospective Randomized Trial
Run by Federal State Budgetary Institution, V. A. Almazov Federal North-West Medical Research Centre, of the Ministry of Health · NCT07711106 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial tests whether using IVUS to guide left main bifurcation stenting is as good as using an angiography-driven, experience-based approach by an IVUS-savvy operator.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 50 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Federal State Budgetary Institution, V. A. Almazov Federal North-West Medical Research Centre, of the Ministry of Health Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Saint Petersburg) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | July 1, 2026 |
| Main results expected | January 1, 2027 |
| Study ends | December 31, 2027 |
| Registry record updated | July 17, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07711106 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Candidates are adults with de novo unprotected left main bifurcation lesions requiring elective bifurcation stenting and feasible IVUS access.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with recent STEMI, cardiogenic shock, prior PCI in the target segment, or anatomy unsuitable for IVUS or bifurcation strategies may not benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This is a prospective randomized comparison of two strategies for optimizing left main bifurcation stenting: an IVUS-guided approach versus an angiography-based, IVUS-experienced (trained eye) approach. All participants receive the same stent type and standard steps like POT and KBI to minimize variability. The primary outcome is post-PCI stent appearance measured by planimetry via IVUS, with the hypothesis that the trained-eye method is non-inferior to IVUS guidance. The study addresses a technical question in a population with de novo unprotected left main disease undergoing bifurcation stenting. Eligibility focuses on elective or delayed procedures with feasible IVUS access; several high-risk conditions exclude participation. The investigation aims to clarify whether expert angiographic assessment can achieve comparable stent optimization to IVUS guidance in this high-stakes setting.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, patients may benefit from a less resource-intensive yet effective approach to left main bifurcation PCI without compromising stent quality.
How similar studies have gone: No prior randomized data directly compare IVUS-guided versus angiography-guided trained-eye approaches in left main bifurcation PCI; this study tests a novel comparison.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * De novo lesion in an unprotected left main coronary artery, indicated for bifurcational stenting (provisional or 2-stent) * Patient referred for elective or delayed (non-emergency) stenting * Technical feasibility of performing IVUS * Signed informed consent Exclusion Criteria: * ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) within the preceding 72 hours * Cardiogenic shock * Isolated (non-bifurcation) left main lesion * Prior PCI in the target segment * Diameter of one of the left main main branches \< 2 mm * Occlusion in the proximal segment of one of the main left main branches without the possibility of simultaneous recanalization * History of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) * Severe comorbidity with expected life expectancy \< 1 year * Participation in another interventional study * Patient is a woman who is pregnant or nursing; * Female patient of childbearing potential, i.e. who are not surgically sterile or post-menopausal (defined as no menses for 2 years without an alternative cause); * IVUS is strictly required for pre-PCI lesion severity assessment * Patients unable to tolerate, obtain or comply with dual antiplatelet therapy for at least 6 months in stable patients and 1 year in ACS patients; * Known contraindication or hypersensitivity to everolimus, platinum-chromium, or to anticoagulants.
Where it's running
-
Federal State Budgetary Institution, V. A. Almazov Federal North-West Medical Research Centre, of the Ministry of Health
Saint Petersburg, Russia Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Aleksei A. Prokhorikhin, PhD
- Email: aa.prohorihin@gmail.com
- Phone: +79137178040
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Crossover vs Accurate Ostial Stenting for Left Main Bifurcation Lesions
This observational study tests two stenting strategies for ostial lesions in the left main coronary artery to see which approach works better for patients with left main bifurcation disease.
-
TAVI and PCI vs SAVR and CABG in low- and intermediate-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis and CAD
This observational study compares TAVI plus PCI to SAVR plus CABG for patients who have both severe aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease.
-
Common femoral vein-to-artery diameter ratio to detect elevated LVEDP
Researchers test whether the ratio of the common femoral vein to artery diameters, measured by ultrasound, can flag elevated LV end-diastolic pressure in patients having coronary angiography.
-
Resveratrol and Estrogen Receptors in Postmenopausal Women with CAD
This study tests whether taking resveratrol is safe and can change estrogen-related markers in postmenopausal women with coronary artery disease.
-
Predicting Plaque Growth Using Blood Flow Stress Markers
This study tests whether combining blood flow patterns in the heart arteries with how blood-flow–sensitive cells respond can help predict which plaques will grow in people with coronary artery disease.
-
Identifying Coronary Plaque Traits with Photon-counting CT and Multimodality Imaging
This study tests whether advanced imaging can better identify risky artery plaques in people with stable angina.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.