Soft tissue augmentation around dental implants using connective tissue graft or less invasive approaches
Official title: Evaluation of Peri-implant Soft Tissue Thickness Following Augmentation Using Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft Versus Submerged Tenting Abutment Versus Sub-crestal Implant Placement: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Run by Misr International University · NCT07714265 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial tests three ways to increase the soft tissue around a dental implant in adults with thin gums to see which method works best.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 20 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 30 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Misr International University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Cairo) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | July 17, 2026 |
| Main results expected | July 15, 2027 |
| Study ends | December 15, 2027 |
| Registry record updated | July 21, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07714265 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults 20 years and older with a single posterior mandible implant indication and thin peri-implant soft tissue (<2 mm).
✕Probably not a fit
Patients not improving tissue thickness or having unfavorable healing may not experience benefit from the tested approaches.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This investigator-initiated, single-center, randomized trial compares three peri-implant soft tissue augmentation approaches in adults with a thin peri-implant phenotype: subepithelial connective tissue graft, submerged tenting abutment, and sub-crestal implant placement. The goal is to determine which technique most effectively increases soft tissue thickness while potentially reducing morbidity compared with the standard grafting method. Participants are adults requiring a single posterior mandible implant, with specific anatomic and health criteria, and will be followed to assess tissue outcomes and implant performance. The study addresses whether less invasive approaches can provide comparable tissue stability and clinical success to the traditional grafting option.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, patients may experience improved soft tissue thickness and esthetic outcomes with fewer surgical risks and less postoperative discomfort.
How similar studies have gone: Previous reports suggest potential benefits of less invasive methods, but direct randomized comparisons to SCTG are limited, making this study relatively novel in its direct head-to-head design.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Adults aged 20 years or older. * Partially edentulous patients requiring a single dental implant in the posterior mandible. * Thin peri-implant soft tissue phenotype (\<2 mm). * Horizontal alveolar ridge width of at least 6 mm. * Vertical bone height of at least 10-12 mm, confirmed radiographically. * Adequate interarch restorative space for implant-supported restoration. * Medically healthy (American Society of Anesthesiologists \[ASA\] Physical Status I or II). * Good oral hygiene. * Able and willing to provide written informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: * Local pathological lesions affecting the surgical site. * Smoking. * Pregnancy or breastfeeding. * Alcohol abuse or parafunctional habits that may compromise implant survival or wound healing. * Medical or local conditions that could interfere with osseointegration, soft tissue healing, or study participation
Where it's running
-
Misr International University Dental Clinic Complex
Cairo, Egypt Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Baraa M Nagy, BDS
- Email: baraa2480582@miuegypt.edu.eg
- Phone: +201063278917
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Effect of four post-extraction socket approaches on preserving the ridge after tooth removal
This study tests four ways to care for an extraction socket to see which best preserves the jawbone and gum after tooth removal for future implants.
-
Immediate molar implants with customized healing abutments in different socket classes
This study tests placing an implant right after extracting a back tooth and using a custom healing cap to shape the gum from day one, in people needing posterior implants.
-
Advanced PRF with Hyaluronic Acid at Implant Sites to Improve Healing
This trial tests whether applying advanced platelet-rich fibrin with hyaluronic acid at the implant site helps bone healing and implant stability after delayed dental implant placement in adults.
-
Volume-stable collagen matrix vs. connective tissue graft for peri-implant soft-tissue defects
This trial tests whether a volume-stable collagen matrix can match the standard connective tissue graft for improving soft tissue around a dental implant in adults with a single missing tooth.
-
Use of enamel matrix derivative with immediate implants in the lower back teeth
This trial tests whether applying enamel matrix derivative at the time of immediate mandibular molar implants helps osseointegration and healing.
-
Biodontoss and DWC dental implants and superstructures in adults needing tooth replacement
This PMCF study tests whether BIODENTOSS and DWC dental implants and their superstructures are safe and effective for adults with tooth loss over 24 months.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.