Robotic Mako cementless versus cemented total knee replacement
Official title: A Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Cementless Mako Robotic-arm Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Versus Cemented Mako Robotic-arm Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Run by University College, London · NCT06929871 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study will test whether robotic Mako cementless or cemented knee replacements work better for adults having a primary total knee replacement for osteoarthritis.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 120 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | University College, London Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (London) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | September 29, 2025 |
| Main results expected | July 31, 2031 |
| Study ends | August 1, 2031 |
| Registry record updated | February 20, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT06929871 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults over 18 with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis who are judged suitable for primary total knee arthroplasty, able to consent, and able to attend follow-up visits are ideal candidates.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with ligament deficiency requiring constrained prostheses, significant bone loss or augmentation, prior ipsilateral revision surgery, severe osteoporosis (T-score < -2.5), or who are not medically fit for surgery are unlikely to benefit from this comparison.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This is a prospective, randomized, single-blinded controlled trial comparing Mako robotic-arm assisted cementless versus cemented total knee arthroplasty. Adult patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis who are fit for primary TKA will be randomized to receive either a cementless or cemented implant and followed with clinical, functional, and radiological assessments. Outcomes include functional scores, imaging for fixation and alignment, and clinical complications or revisions. The protocol excludes patients needing constrained implants, those with significant bone loss or severe osteoporosis (DEXA T-score < -2.5), and those unfit for surgery.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this could improve implant fixation and function and reduce revision risk for people receiving knee replacements.
How similar studies have gone: Registry data and recent reports on modern cementless designs and robotic-assisted TKA show promising short- to mid-term outcomes, but randomized comparisons with long-term follow-up remain limited.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Patient has symptomatic knee osteoarthritis requiring primary TKA 2. Patient and surgeon are in agreement that TKA is the most appropriate treatment 3. Patient is fit for surgical intervention following review by surgeon and anaesthetist 4. Patient is over 18 years old at time of surgery 5. Gender: male and female 6. Patient must be capable of giving informed consent and agree to comply with the postoperative review program 7. Patient must have sufficient postoperative mobility to attend follow-up clinics and allow for radiographs to be taken Exclusion Criteria: 1. Patient is not suitable for routine primary TKA e.g. patient has ligament deficiency that requires a constrained prosthesis 2. Patient has bone loss that requires augmentation 3. Patient is not medically fit for surgical intervention 4. Patient requires revision surgery following previously failed correctional osteotomy or ipsilateral TKA 5. Patient has a DEXA scan with T-score \< -2.5 at any point 6. Patient is immobile or has another neurological condition affecting musculoskeletal function 7. Patient is less than 18 years at time of surgery 8. Patient is unable or unwilling to sign the informed consent form specific to this study 9. Patient is unable to attend the follow-up programme 10. Previous pathological fracture
Where it's running
-
UCL Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
London, United Kingdom Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Jenni Tahmassebi, BSc MSc
- Email: jenni.tahmassebi1@nhs.net
- Phone: +442034479403
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Suzetrigine for pain relief after knee replacement
This trial tests whether suzetrigine can reduce opioid use after a total knee replacement compared with placebo.
-
Preoperative Genicular Nerve Block for Knee Replacement
This study tests whether giving a genicular nerve block before knee replacement can reduce pain after surgery and lower opioid use.
-
Binaural beats to reduce pain and anxiety after hip or knee replacement
This will try a 30-minute binaural beats audio session in the PACU to see if it lowers pain and anxiety for adults having same-day total hip or knee replacement.
-
Choose to Move Replacement Ready for people waiting for hip or knee replacement
This project will test whether the Choose to Move Replacement Ready program helps older adults on hip or knee replacement waitlists increase physical activity, improve mobility, and support psychosocial health.
-
Mind mapping-based education to help after knee replacement
A group of adults having total knee replacement will receive mind-mapping education in addition to standard care to see if it helps with pain, fear of movement, and readiness to leave the hospital.
-
DoACs vs LMWH for blood flow after knee replacement
This study tests whether rivaroxaban, apixaban, or LMWH work differently to support blood flow in the legs after total knee replacement in adults.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.