Remimazolam versus Midazolam for sedation and early thinking recovery in older adults having orthopedic surgery

Randomized, Double-Blind, 2x2 Factorial Trial of Remimazolam vs. Midazolam on Sedation and Early Cognitive Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Traumatic or Non-Traumatic Orthopedic Surgery With Regional Anesthesia

Phase 3 Interventional Romanian Society for Enteral and Parenteral Nutrition · NCT07113483

This will test whether remimazolam or midazolam gives better sedation and faster early recovery of thinking and memory for people 65 and older undergoing orthopedic surgery with regional anesthesia.

Quick facts

PhasePhase 3
Study typeInterventional
Enrollment120 (estimated)
Ages65 Years and up
SexAll
SponsorRomanian Society for Enteral and Parenteral Nutrition Academic / other
Locations1 site (Bucharest)
Trial IDNCT07113483 on ClinicalTrials.gov

What this trial studies

This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, single-center Phase 3 trial comparing remimazolam and midazolam for sedation during orthopedic procedures performed under regional anesthesia in patients aged 65 and older. The design uses a 2x2 factorial randomization creating four arms (remimazolam or midazolam crossed with traumatic vs non‑traumatic cases) with blinding of patients and staff. Investigators will monitor sedation depth, blood pressure, heart rate, adverse events, adjunct propofol use, and early cognitive recovery using standardized assessments (including CAM-ICU) at defined time points after surgery. Safety oversight is provided by a DSMB and the analysis plan includes pre-specified primary and secondary endpoints for cognitive and hemodynamic outcomes.

Who should consider this trial

Good fit: Ideal candidates are adults aged 65 or older scheduled for traumatic or non-traumatic orthopedic surgery under regional anesthesia with a baseline Mini-Cog score ≥3 and without severe hepatic or renal failure.

Not a fit: Patients with moderate-to-severe baseline cognitive impairment, severe liver or kidney failure, benzodiazepine allergy or dependence, or those receiving general anesthesia are unlikely to benefit from this protocol.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, the trial could show that remimazolam provides safer sedation with faster early cognitive recovery and fewer hemodynamic problems in older orthopedic patients.

How similar studies have performed: Previous procedural and anesthetic studies have shown remimazolam produces rapid onset/offset and favorable recovery compared with some sedatives, but head-to-head evidence specifically on early postoperative cognitive outcomes in older orthopedic patients is limited.

Eligibility criteria

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* Adults aged 65 years or older.
* Scheduled for traumatic or non-traumatic orthopedic surgery under regional anesthesia.
* Able to provide informed consent or have a legally authorized representative provide consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Patient refusal to participate.
* Mini-Cog score less than 3 (indicative of significant cognitive impairment).
* Severe hepatic or renal failure.
* Known allergy to benzodiazepines or propofol.
* History of benzodiazepine dependence.

Where this trial is running

Bucharest

Study contacts

How to participate

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Visit the official trial page on ClinicalTrials.gov for the most current contact information and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the listed study coordinator or principal investigator to request pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Conditions Postoperative Cognitive DysfunctionOrthopedic ProceduresPostoperative Pain ManagementHip FractureRemimazolamMidazolamRegional AnesthesiaSedation
Last reviewed 2026-06-10 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.