Crossover vs Accurate Ostial Stenting for Left Main Bifurcation Lesions
Official title: Crossover vs Accurate Ostial PCI for Medina 0.0.1 and 0.1.0 Left Main Bifurcation Lesions: the Multicenter OSTIAL-ANATOLIA Study
Run by Istanbul Mehmet Akif Ersoy Educational and Training Hospital · NCT07596706 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This observational study tests two stenting strategies for ostial lesions in the left main coronary artery to see which approach works better for patients with left main bifurcation disease.
Quick facts
| Study type | Observational |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 85 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 1000 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Istanbul Mehmet Akif Ersoy Educational and Training Hospital Government |
| Locations | 2 sites (Istanbul, Please Select and 1 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | May 12, 2026 |
| Main results expected | September 1, 2027 |
| Study ends | September 15, 2027 |
| Registry record updated | July 9, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07596706 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are patients with ostial disease of the LAD or LCx undergoing PCI with second- or third-generation DES and no prohibitive left main disease or prior bypass grafts.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with severe comorbidities, complex left main disease, or those not receiving DES may see limited benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
The study compares accurate ostial stenting with crossover stenting that extends from the left main artery into the daughter vessel for ostial lesions. It aims to generate prospective, methodologically robust data on clinically important outcomes such as major adverse cardiovascular events and need for revascularization. Eligible participants have ostial disease of the LAD or LCx and are undergoing second- or third-generation drug-eluting stent implantation. The analysis will focus on differences in procedural success, residual stenosis, and short- to mid-term clinical endpoints. Current evidence is largely retrospective, and this study seeks to standardize approaches and improve evidence-based decision making for these high-risk lesions.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the study could clarify which strategy provides better outcomes and guide interventional choices for ostial left main lesions.
How similar studies have gone: Previous observational analyses show mixed results; there is a need for prospective comparative data.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Ostial left anterior descending artery or left circumflex artery disease * Coronary intervention with second or third generation drug-eluting stent Exclusion Criteria: * Severe left main disease (≥30%, intravascular ultrasound plaque burden \>50%) * History of coronary bypass grafting * Cardiogenic shock * Left main diameter greater than stent expansion capacity (for crossover group) * In-stent restenosis * End-stage liver or kidney disease (cirrhosis, hemodialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease), * Coronary intervention with bare-metal stent * Early discontinuation or inappropriate use of DAPT treatment * Patients lost to follow-up * Patient life expectancy \<1 year (such as cancer)
Where it's running
-
İstanbul Mehmet Akif Ersoy Thoracic And Cardiovascular Surgery Training and Research Hospital
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye) Recruiting -
Istanbul Mehmet Akif Ersoy Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Hospital
Istanbul, Please Select, Turkey (Türkiye) Active not recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Ahmet Güner, MD
- Email: ahmetguner488@gmail.com
- Phone: +90212692200
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
IVUS-Guided Left Main Stenting: IVUS-Guided vs Trained-Eye Approach
This trial tests whether using IVUS to guide left main bifurcation stenting is as good as using an angiography-driven, experience-based approach by an IVUS-savvy operator.
-
TAVI and PCI vs SAVR and CABG in low- and intermediate-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis and CAD
This observational study compares TAVI plus PCI to SAVR plus CABG for patients who have both severe aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease.
-
Resveratrol and Estrogen Receptors in Postmenopausal Women with CAD
This study tests whether taking resveratrol is safe and can change estrogen-related markers in postmenopausal women with coronary artery disease.
-
Predicting Plaque Growth Using Blood Flow Stress Markers
This study tests whether combining blood flow patterns in the heart arteries with how blood-flow–sensitive cells respond can help predict which plaques will grow in people with coronary artery disease.
-
Identifying Coronary Plaque Traits with Photon-counting CT and Multimodality Imaging
This study tests whether advanced imaging can better identify risky artery plaques in people with stable angina.
-
Health for Hungary: Long-term blood and health data collection to study aging and disease onset
This study tests whether routine blood tests plus advanced molecular analyses can help detect the early stages of non-communicable diseases in adults over 40.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.