Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Interventional Ages 18 to 65

Humidification methods in trauma ICU patients on mechanical ventilation

Official title: Effect of Active Versus Passive Humidification on Airway Complications and Clinical Outcomes in Trauma ICU Patients With Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation

Run by Assiut University · NCT07713238 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This study tests whether active heated humidifiers or passive heat-and-moisture exchangers work better in trauma ICU patients who need long-term mechanical ventilation.

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
Ages18 Years to 65 Years
SexAll
Enrollment162 (estimated)
SponsorAssiut University
Academic / other
Locations1 site (Asyut, Asyut Governorate)
StatusRecruiting
StartedMay 13, 2026
Main results expectedDecember 12, 2026
Study endsMay 12, 2027
Registry record updatedOctober 27, 2026
Trial IDNCT07713238 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Adults aged 18–65 with trauma ICU admission on invasive mechanical ventilation expected to require at least 7 days of support.

Probably not a fit

Patients with contraindications to HMEs or those already using mixed humidification strategies or with severe secretions may not benefit.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This randomized trial compares two airway humidification methods in trauma ICU patients requiring extended mechanical ventilation. It examines how active heated humidification versus passive heat-and-moisture exchangers affect airway secretions, tube blockages, and clinical outcomes such as ventilator-associated pneumonia, duration of ventilation, and length of ICU stay. The study focuses on trauma patients who may have thick or bloody secretions that challenge airway management. Participants are adults aged 18–65 admitted to Assiut University Trauma ICUs, with prolonged ventilation anticipated (≥7 days). Exclusion criteria include immunosuppression, very low white blood cell counts, withdrawal of life support within 5 days, and specific contraindications to heat-and-moisture exchangers.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, the approach could reduce airway complications and improve ventilation outcomes for trauma patients requiring prolonged support.

How similar studies have gone: Past data in general ICU populations show no clear overall winner between humidification methods, making this trauma-focused study novel and potentially practice-changing.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria

1. Adult age 18-65 years.
2. Trauma ICU patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation.
3. Anticipated to require prolonged mechanical ventilation, defined as ≥7 days of invasive ventilatory support

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Immunosuppression such as HIV, cancer or AIDS.
2. Blood leukocyte count \<1,000 cells/mm3.
3. Withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment within 5 days.
4. Use of HME in conjunction with an HH.
5. Contraindications of HME including body temperature \< 32°C, copious, thick, or bloody secretions, significant air leak (exhaled VT \>70% of VT inspired) or broncopleural fistula

Where it's running

  • Trauma Intensive Care Units, Assiut University Hospital
    Asyut, Asyut Governorate, Egypt
    Recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.