How different ventilator settings affect lung energy during gallbladder surgery
Official title: Comparison of Mechanical Power in Pressure-Regulated Volume Control and Volume-Controlled Ventilation Modes During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Run by Dr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital · NCT07670494 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study tests whether two ventilator modes (VCV and PRVC) deliver different amounts of energy to the lungs in adults undergoing laparoscopic gallbladder removal.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 80 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Dr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Yenimahalle, Ankara) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | July 1, 2026 |
| Main results expected | August 10, 2026 |
| Study ends | August 12, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | July 8, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07670494 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults 18–75 years old undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy with ASA I–III and BMI 18.5–35 kg/m², able to consent.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with significant COPD/asthma, prior major thoracic surgery, heavy smoking history, spontaneous breathing during ventilation, conversion to open surgery, emergency cases, or pregnancy may not benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
In adults scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy, researchers compare two ventilation modes—volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) and pressure-regulated volume control (PRVC)—to see how much mechanical power is delivered to the lungs. The comparison is done in a randomized, cross-over design during the same surgery to assess energy transfer despite differences in peak airway pressure. Mechanical power, a surrogate for potential lung stress, is calculated from ventilator data to determine if PRVC’s lower peak pressure translates to lower overall lung energy. The trial is observationally focused on ventilation parameters and does not involve experimental drugs or therapies. Results could inform safer ventilation strategies for patients without significant lung disease.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If PRVC reduces total energy delivered to the lungs, it could lower the risk of ventilator-related lung injury during laparoscopic surgery.
How similar studies have gone: Previous work suggests ventilator mode differences can affect airway pressures and energy delivery; this study adds direct comparison within a single procedure.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery. * Patients between 18 and 75 years of age. * American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I, II or III. * Body Mass Index (BMI) between 18.5 and 35 kg/m². * Voluntary written informed consent for participation. Exclusion Criteria: * History of significant chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma. * Previous lung resection or major thoracic surgery. * Heavy smokers (more than 20 cigarettes per day). * Presence of spontaneous breathing effort during mechanical ventilation. * Conversion from laparoscopic surgery to open surgery during the procedure. * Emergency surgery cases. * Known pregnancy.
Where it's running
-
Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Hospital
Yenimahalle, Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye) Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: arif timuroglu, MD
- Email: ariftimuroglu@yahoo.com
- Phone: +905072601980
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Pulse Wave vs Saline Bolus EIT to measure lung perfusion in ARDS
This study tests whether pulse wave EIT or saline bolus EIT can best show lung blood flow in ARDS patients on mechanical ventilation.
-
Computed inspiratory muscle pressure to monitor inspiratory effort during pressure-targeted assist/control ventilation
This study tests a noninvasive computed pressure method (cPmus) to see if it matches the traditional esophageal pressure method for measuring inspiratory effort in adults on pressure-targeted ventilation with spontaneous breathing.
-
Noninvasive estimate of inspiratory effort to monitor pressure support ventilation
This study tests whether a noninvasive computed inspiratory muscle pressure (cPmus) can match the traditional esophageal pressure method for adults on pressure support ventilation.
-
Driving pressure-guided individualized PEEP vs standard PEEP during upper abdominal surgery
In this randomized trial, adults at higher risk of breathing problems after upper abdominal surgery will try a personalized PEEP level based on the lowest driving pressure and compare it to a fixed PEEP of 5 cmH2O to see if it lowers postoperative lung complications.
-
Inspiratory Effort and Dyspnea During Assisted Mechanical Ventilation in Critically Ill Adults
This study tests how different patient breathing efforts relate to breathlessness in adults on assisted mechanical ventilation.
-
FCV vs VC—Obese Adults Undergoing Laparoscopic Surgery
In obese adults having laparoscopic surgery, researchers will see if flow-controlled ventilation (FCV) works better than volume-controlled ventilation with autoflow (VC-AF) at keeping airway pressures and lung energy lower.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.