Heart rate variability feedback to help practitioners make better patient decisions
Official title: Heart Rate Variability for Practitioner Stimulated Reflection and Decision-making Optimisation
Run by Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · NCT07709364 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study tests whether giving healthcare workers HRV feedback during care improves how quickly and safely they respond to ventilator events and bedside needs.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 21 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 20 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Government |
| Locations | 1 site (Cambridge, Cambridgeshire) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | July 14, 2026 |
| Main results expected | June 1, 2027 |
| Study ends | June 1, 2027 |
| Registry record updated | September 18, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07709364 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Nurses working in the Enhanced Recovery Unit at Royal Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust who are willing to participate and not using medications or devices that affect HRV.
✕Probably not a fit
Staff with pacemakers or on HRV-affecting medications may not experience a benefit from this intervention.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
In a data-rich ICU setting, practitioners will engage in a critical participatory action intervention that uses heart rate variability data to guide reflective practice. Two intervention periods will allow clinicians to explore how their own physiological signals relate to decision making and bedside performance. Outcomes include changes in practitioners' HRV, faster and more accurate responses to ventilator events, more time spent at the patient’s bedside, and improvements in ventilation-related patient outcomes. The study also aims to reduce alarm burden by lowering inappropriate alarms and bedside noise. Eligibility is limited to nurses at Royal Papworth Hospital who consent to participate and do not have pacemakers or medications that affect HRV.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, practitioners may make quicker, more context-aware decisions, which could improve patient safety and ventilation outcomes.
How similar studies have gone: Previous research suggests feedback-based and participatory approaches can influence clinician performance, but applying HRV as a real-time feedback loop in this setting is relatively novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Nurse working in Enhanced Recovery Unit at Royal Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust * Willingness to participate in the trial Exclusion Criteria: * Staff with permanent pacemakers * Staff on medication that could affect HRV (e.g. b-blockers)
Where it's running
-
Royal Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Robert Gatherer, MBBS — Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
- Study coordinator: Clinical Project Manager
- Email: jeong-min.chun@nhs.net
- Phone: 01223638000
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
How the brain simulates future moves during multi-step planning
We will test whether healthy adults mentally simulate promising future move sequences while planning in a Four-in-a-Row game using brain recordings and eye tracking.
-
Improving math skills in children with learning disabilities
This study tests a new way to help children with learning disabilities improve their math skills by using different methods to see what works best for them.
-
Pulse Wave vs Saline Bolus EIT to measure lung perfusion in ARDS
This study tests whether pulse wave EIT or saline bolus EIT can best show lung blood flow in ARDS patients on mechanical ventilation.
-
Computed inspiratory muscle pressure to monitor inspiratory effort during pressure-targeted assist/control ventilation
This study tests a noninvasive computed pressure method (cPmus) to see if it matches the traditional esophageal pressure method for measuring inspiratory effort in adults on pressure-targeted ventilation with spontaneous breathing.
-
Noninvasive estimate of inspiratory effort to monitor pressure support ventilation
This study tests whether a noninvasive computed inspiratory muscle pressure (cPmus) can match the traditional esophageal pressure method for adults on pressure support ventilation.
-
Driving pressure-guided individualized PEEP vs standard PEEP during upper abdominal surgery
In this randomized trial, adults at higher risk of breathing problems after upper abdominal surgery will try a personalized PEEP level based on the lowest driving pressure and compare it to a fixed PEEP of 5 cmH2O to see if it lowers postoperative lung complications.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.