Digital vs. Conventional Indirect Bonding in Teens
Official title: Comparison of Indirect Bonding of Orthodontic Brackets Using Digital Versus Conventional Technology: A Randomized Controlled Trial on Bonding Time and Bracket Failure
Run by Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · NCT07692880 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study tests whether digital indirect bonding works as well as the conventional method for placing braces in teens who need treatment on both arches.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 12 Years to 18 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 20 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Florence) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | September 3, 2025 |
| Main results expected | July 20, 2026 |
| Study ends | August 24, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | July 9, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07692880 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Eligible participants are 12 to 18 years old with full permanent dentition requiring fixed treatment on both arches.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with dental anomalies, planned extractions, nickel allergy, or craniofacial conditions may not benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This randomized split-mouth trial compares digital indirect bonding with conventional indirect bonding for fixed orthodontic brackets in adolescents. Each participant receives both methods, with arch assignment determined randomly. The study measures how long bonding takes and tracks bracket failures during the first month after placement. Digital bonding uses a digital workflow to make transfer trays and pre-coated adhesive, while conventional bonding uses a standard lab workflow and standard adhesive. The goal is to see if the digital approach can match or improve efficiency and early bracket stability.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, digital indirect bonding could shorten chair time and provide reliable bracket placement for teens.
How similar studies have gone: Previous work suggests digital workflows can standardize steps and improve efficiency, but results for indirect bonding are mixed and context-dependent.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients aged 12 to 18 years requiring fixed orthodontic treatment on both upper and lower arches * Presence of full permanent dentition, including erupted second molars Exclusion Criteria: * Presence of dental anomalies in number (supernumerary or missing teeth) in either arch * Orthodontic treatment plans involving tooth extractions in either arch * Nickel allergy * History of cleft lip and/or palate * Craniofacial syndromes
Where it's running
-
Orthodontic Clinic, Division of Dentistry, Careggi University Hospital
Florence, Italy Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Lorenzo Franchi
- Email: lorenzo.franchi@unifi.it
- Phone: +390557945602
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
FM Move: A New Method for Moving Back Teeth During Clear Aligner Therapy
A single-group study tests a new FM method to move the canine and first molar together in people needing back-teeth movement, to see if treatment time can be shortened.
-
3-D imaging of bone and root changes after moving a buccally displaced upper canine.
This trial tests two orthodontic traction methods to see which causes less bone loss and root shortening when fixing a buccally displaced upper canine.
-
Clear thermoplastic maxillary expander versus Hyrax for adolescents
This will test whether a clear PETG thermoplastic expander with an integrated screw works as well as a Hyrax expander to widen the upper jaw in adolescents (ages 10–14) with a narrow maxilla.
-
Facially guided digital full-mouth rehabilitation
This approach tries a fully digital, face-guided workflow to rebuild the mouths of adults (20–45) who have bite problems, missing lower molars, and are unhappy with their smile.
-
Comparing scalloped, straight, and straight-extended trimlines for SureSmile clear aligners
This study tests whether three different trimline designs for SureSmile clear aligners give accurate tooth movements in adults with mild-to-moderate malocclusion.
-
Bromelain to reduce facial swelling after jaw surgery
This test will see if taking a daily bromelain supplement before and after orthognathic (jaw) surgery reduces facial swelling and shortens how long swelling lasts in adults.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.