Comparing scalloped, straight, and straight-extended trimlines for SureSmile clear aligners
Official title: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Post-market Clinical Investigation to Assess the Accuracy of Different Tooth Movements for Patients Undergoing Clear Aligner Therapy (CAT) With SureSmile® Clear Aligners With Three Different Trimlines.
Run by Dentsply Sirona Implants and Consumables · NCT07290790 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study tests whether three different trimline designs for SureSmile clear aligners give accurate tooth movements in adults with mild-to-moderate malocclusion.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 90 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Dentsply Sirona Implants and Consumables Industry-sponsored |
| Locations | 6 sites (Fresno, California and 5 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | January 29, 2026 |
| Main results expected | December 31, 2027 |
| Study ends | February 1, 2028 |
| Registry record updated | August 11, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07290790 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults (18+) with permanent dentition and mild-to-moderate malocclusion consistent with Levels 1–2 case complexity (for example, crowding/spacing ≤6 mm, midline deviation ≤3 mm, overjet ≤4 mm, overbite ≤3 mm) are ideal candidates.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with severe malocclusion beyond Levels 1–2, missing second molars or not in permanent dentition, significant open bites beyond the protocol limits, or those under 18 are unlikely to benefit from this investigation.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This prospective, multicenter clinical investigation enrolls adults with permanent dentition and mild-to-moderate malocclusion (Levels 1–2) and assigns them to one of three treatment arms using SureSmile clear aligners with scalloped, straight, or straight-extended trimlines. The primary objectives are to confirm device safety and measure the accuracy of planned versus achieved tooth movements for different trimline designs. Participants will receive the assigned aligner treatment and attend scheduled follow-ups at one of three U.S. centers where clinicians will document outcomes using clinical exams and digital scans. Results will compare movement accuracy metrics and any adverse events across the three trimline groups.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the results could help clinicians choose a trimline design that produces more predictable tooth movements and reduces the need for corrective adjustments.
How similar studies have gone: While clear aligner systems including SureSmile have evidence supporting predictable movements in selected cases, direct head-to-head comparisons of these specific trimline designs are limited, so this comparison is relatively novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Subject willing to participate in the clinical investigation, able to understand the intent risks and benefits of the clinical investigation as well as associated time commitment and follow-ups visits. * Subject has signed and dated the informed consent form (ICF) . * Subject aged 18 years or above at time of informed consent. * Subject has permanent dentition (i.e., all 2nd molars). * Subject with a dental malocclusion, consistent with Levels 1 and 2 case complexity and within the clinical references as defined in the SureSmile Case Selection Guide. * Crowding or spacing must be ≤6mm present in one or both arches consistent with level 1 and 2 of case complexity. * Midline deviation must be ≤3 mm consistent with level 1 and 2 of case complexity. * Overjet must be ≤4 mm consistent with level 1 and 2 case complexity. * Overbite must be ≤3 mm consistent with level 1 and 2 case complexity. * Anterior open bite must be ≤1 mm, consistent with level 1 and 2 case complexity. * Intermaxillary elastics may be included within the treatment plan to support sagittal, vertical, or transverse correction within the limits defined under exclusion criteria. Exclusion Criteria: * Subjects unlikely to comply with investigational procedures, or unlikely to come back for follow-up visits, as judged by the Investigator. * Subject that presents a dental malocclusion classified as level 3 case complexity, as defined in the SureSmile Case Selection Guide. * Subjects who have completed aligner therapy within the last 12 months or who are in active orthodontic treatment. * Subjects with active periodontal disease or other unresolved dental conditions such as active cavities, active periodontal disease. * Subjects with treatment plans requiring transverse correction requiring expansion greater than 4 mm per arch or 2 mm per quadrant, or any skeletal transverse correction. * Treatment plans requiring sagittal correction exceeding a half-cusp discrepancy (i.e., \>½ unit) in molar or canine relationships. * Subjects with treatment plans require vertical correction beyond Level 1 and 2 thresholds (i.e., overbite \>3 mm or anterior/posterior open bite \>1 mm), or vertical elastics exceeding 3 mm. * TMJ (Temporo-Mandibular Join) disorders or history of headaches or migraines. * Participants with known history of plastic allergies. * Subjects with presence of skeletal discrepancies necessitating orthognathic surgery, rapid palatal expansion, other orthopedic intervention, unilateral or bilateral cross-bites, mandibular deviations in association with the diagnosed malocclusion * The use of TADs (Temporary Anchor Devices), plates, other fixed anchorage ancillaries or the use of functional appliances (distalizers, growth modification devices), any approach involving orthopedic or skeletal sagittal correction or the use of hybrid fixed appliances are not considered part of the scope of this clinical investigation and these subjects are not eligible. * Uncontrolled para-functional habits, e.g., bruxism. * Any other condition that would make the subject unsuitable for participation, including but not limited to: * Unstable psychiatric illness. * Recent myocardial infarction (\< 3 months\*). * Recent cerebrovascular accident (\< 3 months\*). * Recent cardiac-valvular prosthesis placement (\< 3 months\*). * Hemorrhagic diathesis. * Severe liver dysfunction. * Known or suspected current malignancy. * Known pregnancy at the time of enrolment. * Previous enrolment in the present clinical investigation. * Involvement in the planning and conduct of the clinical investigation (applies to both Dentsply Sirona personnel and the clinical investigation site). * Participation in another clinical investigation that may interfere with the present clinical investigation.
Where it's running
-
Costanzo Orthodontics
Fresno, California, United States Recruiting -
J Chichetti PLLC 2
Huntersville, North Carolina, United States Recruiting -
Brush 365 Dental
Frisco, Texas, United States Recruiting -
Center for Orthodontic Excellence
Princeton Junction, New Jersey, United States Not yet recruiting -
Clinica Dental Ortiz Puigpelat
Barcelona, Spain Not yet recruiting -
The Sanford
Bexleyheath, United Kingdom Not yet recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Freja Freedman
- Email: freja.freedman@dentsplysirona.com
- Phone: +46 702107415
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
FM Move: A New Method for Moving Back Teeth During Clear Aligner Therapy
A single-group study tests a new FM method to move the canine and first molar together in people needing back-teeth movement, to see if treatment time can be shortened.
-
Digital vs. Conventional Indirect Bonding in Teens
This study tests whether digital indirect bonding works as well as the conventional method for placing braces in teens who need treatment on both arches.
-
3-D imaging of bone and root changes after moving a buccally displaced upper canine.
This trial tests two orthodontic traction methods to see which causes less bone loss and root shortening when fixing a buccally displaced upper canine.
-
Clear thermoplastic maxillary expander versus Hyrax for adolescents
This will test whether a clear PETG thermoplastic expander with an integrated screw works as well as a Hyrax expander to widen the upper jaw in adolescents (ages 10–14) with a narrow maxilla.
-
Facially guided digital full-mouth rehabilitation
This approach tries a fully digital, face-guided workflow to rebuild the mouths of adults (20–45) who have bite problems, missing lower molars, and are unhappy with their smile.
-
Bromelain to reduce facial swelling after jaw surgery
This test will see if taking a daily bromelain supplement before and after orthognathic (jaw) surgery reduces facial swelling and shortens how long swelling lasts in adults.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.