Comparing oxygen targets with different oximeters for better oxygen flow management
Official title: Comparison of Two Oxygenation Targets With Two Different Oximeters - Impact on Oxygen Flow Rates and Oxygenation
Run by Laval University · NCT05590130 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study tests whether using different types of oximeters can help manage oxygen flow better for patients recovering from heart surgery.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 40 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Laval University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Québec, Quebec) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | November 16, 2022 |
| Main results expected | June 2027 |
| Study ends | December 2027 |
| Registry record updated | November 5, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT05590130 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults aged 18 and older who are admitted to a postoperative cardiac surgery intensive care unit and require conventional oxygen therapy.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients who are unable to provide a SpO2 signal with the oximeter or have conditions like methemoglobinemia or are in isolation may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This study evaluates the impact of two different oximeters, Nonin and Philips, on oxygen flow rates and oxygenation targets in patients recovering from cardiac surgery. Participants will be assigned to different oximeters and SpO2 targets (90% and 94%) in a randomized manner, with arterial gas samples collected to assess oxygenation levels. The goal is to determine how the choice of oximeter and target saturation affects the required oxygen flow rates. This could lead to more effective oxygen management in postoperative care.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could improve oxygen management strategies, potentially reducing the risk of oxygen toxicity and respiratory failure in postoperative patients.
How similar studies have gone: While there have been studies on oximeter accuracy, this specific comparison of oxygen targets and their impact on flow rates is novel and has not been extensively tested.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * ≥ 18 years of age * Patients admitted to postoperative cardiac surgery intensive care unit * Presence of an arterial catheter Specific for the extubate patient * Ongoing on conventional oxygen therapy at moderate flow (up to a maximum of 5L/min) with SpO2 between 88 and 100% with the usual oximeter and nasal cannula. * SpO2 \< 92% ambient air Specific for the intubate patient FiO2 \<= 0.60 with SpO2 between 88 and 100% with usual oximeter SpO2 \< 92% with FiO2 0.21 Exclusion Criteria: * No SpO2 signal with oximeter in use * False nails or nail polish * Methemoglobinemia \>0.015 on last available arterial gas * Patient in isolation (multi-resistant bacteria, C-Difficile, SARS-CoV-2 ...) Specific for the extubate patient * Expected to use another respiratory support within one hour of inclusion (NIV or nasal high flow oxygen) Planned extubation within one hour of inclusion
Where it's running
-
Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec
Québec, Quebec, Canada Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Francois Lellouche
- Email: francois.lellouche@criucpq.ulaval.ca
- Phone: 418656-8711
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
How different oxygen targets and interfaces affect oxygen flow in patients needing supplemental oxygen
This study tests how the oxygen delivery interface (nasal cannula at various flow rates, open mask, or simple mask) and SpO2 target settings influence the amount of oxygen flow patients require.
-
HFNC During Bronchoscopy for Respiratory Failure
This study tests whether using high-flow nasal oxygen during fiber-optic bronchoscopy is safe and helpful for patients with respiratory failure.
-
Respiratory progression in adults with Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a long-term observational study
This study tests how respiratory function changes over three years in adults with genetically confirmed Duchenne muscular dystrophy.
-
Epidural spinal cord stimulation to help breathing after cervical spinal cord injury
This trial tests whether adding epidural spinal cord stimulation to standard care can improve breathing in adults with cervical spinal cord injury and respiratory failure.
-
Brain blood flow and brain regulation in critically ill kids
This study tests how blood flow in the brain behaves in critically ill children using a noninvasive ultrasound (TCD) to see if brain autoregulation patterns relate to outcomes.
-
Ciprofol versus propofol for sedating adult ICU patients on noninvasive respiratory support
See if ciprofol works better than propofol for sedating adults in the ICU who are receiving noninvasive ventilation, high-flow nasal cannula, or oxygen therapy.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.