Whether differences in cognitive control affect real-time fMRI neurofeedback performance
Official title: Individual Differences in Cognitive Control Predict Real-time fMRI Neurofeedback Performance
Run by University of Electronic Science and Technology of China · NCT07211269 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This research tries to see if healthy adults' cognitive control skills predict how well they can learn to boost activity in the left anterior insula using real-time fMRI neurofeedback and heartbeat-focused strategies.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 35 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 40 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | University of Electronic Science and Technology of China Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Chengdu, Chengdu) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | September 3, 2025 |
| Main results expected | December 27, 2025 |
| Study ends | January 12, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | October 7, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT07211269 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Healthy adults without current or past psychiatric or neurological disorders who can safely undergo MRI (no metal implants or claustrophobia) and can attend two visits at the Chengdu site.
✕Probably not a fit
People with a history of brain injury, current medical or mental illness, color vision problems, metal in the body, or claustrophobia are excluded and would not be eligible or likely to benefit from participation.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
The study enrolls healthy adults for two visits spaced 3–7 days apart. The first visit collects standardized questionnaires, a heartbeat counting pre-test, and four cognitive control tasks (Go/No-Go, Stroop, task-switching, N-back). The second visit includes anatomical and resting-state MRI scans, four runs of real-time fMRI neurofeedback training targeting the left anterior insula with upregulation using interoceptive strategies, a transfer run without feedback, and a post-test heartbeat counting task. After regulation blocks participants provide pain empathy and strategy efficacy ratings to link neural regulation with behavioral measures.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this work could help identify who is most likely to benefit from neurofeedback and guide more personalized approaches to interoceptive and emotional regulation.
How similar studies have gone: Prior real-time fMRI neurofeedback studies targeting the insula and interoception have shown promising but mixed effects, while using cognitive-control measures to predict individual neurofeedback success is relatively novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Healthy subjects without any past or present psychiatric or neurological disorders Exclusion Criteria: * History of brain injury Medical or mental illness and color blindness or weakness. * The presence of metal in the body or claustrophobia.
Where it's running
-
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
Chengdu, Chengdu, China Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Yao Shuxia, Dr. — University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
- Study coordinator: Keith M Kendrick, Dr.
- Email: k.kendrick.uestc@gmail.com
- Phone: 86-28-61830811
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Do Quercefit® or Ubiqsome™ help with aging and metabolic health in adults 50–75?
This study tests whether Quercefit® or Ubiqsome™ can improve aging markers, blood sugar, and heart health in sedentary adults aged 50–75 compared with a placebo.
-
NVTIA Ergothioneine for Healthy Aging and Skin Health
This study tests whether taking NVTIA Ergothioneine daily for 12 weeks helps healthy adults age more gracefully and keeps skin looking and feeling better compared with a placebo.
-
Miricell supplementation and markers of healthy aging
This trial tests whether taking Miricell once daily for 12 weeks improves cellular health and brain/metabolic indicators in adults aged 40–70 compared with a placebo.
-
Does daily lean beef support brain health in older adults
In healthy adults aged 65 and up, this study tests whether eating lean beef every day for two weeks can influence brain health markers compared with a non-beef, protein-matched option.
-
Adaptive computerized training to boost thinking in healthy seniors and those with mild cognitive impairment
This study tests whether a computer-based training program can improve executive thinking in older adults, including those with mild cognitive impairment, and see if it also helps memory and well-being.
-
SHARP: Personalized Health and Behavior Plan to Lower Biological Age in Older Adults
A 12-month randomized trial tests whether a personalized health and behavior program can lower biological age and improve function in healthy adults over 50.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.