Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Interventional Ages 18 to 70

Very high-power short-duration vs standard low-power radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation

Official title: Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of High-Power Short-Duration Radiofrequency Ablation and Standard Low-Power Ablation in Catheter Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

Run by Bakulev Scientific Center of Cardiovascular Surgery · NCT07728539 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This trial tests whether very high-power short-duration ablation (90 W) is as safe and more effective than conventional low-power ablation (35-45 W) for treating atrial fibrillation.

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
Ages18 Years to 70 Years
SexAll
Enrollment196 (estimated)
SponsorBakulev Scientific Center of Cardiovascular Surgery
Government
Locations1 site (Moscow)
StatusRecruiting
StartedJune 15, 2026
Main results expectedJune 1, 2028
Study endsJune 1, 2029
Registry record updatedJuly 27, 2026
Trial IDNCT07728539 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Adults over 18 with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation resistant to antiarrhythmic therapy, suitable for catheter ablation at experienced centers.

Probably not a fit

Patients with significant structural heart disease, severe renal impairment, or other exclusion criteria may not experience added benefit from the high-power approach.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This randomized, open-label study compares two radiofrequency ablation strategies for pulmonary vein isolation in adults with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation. Participants are assigned to either very high-power short-duration ablation at 90 W or conventional low-power ablation at 35-45 W, using non-fluoroscopic navigation and CLOSE protocol. The trial targets experienced AF centers and plans to enroll 196 patients. Outcomes focus on safety and efficacy of the energy delivery strategies in achieving durable isolation. The study excludes patients with significant comorbidities or organ dysfunction that could confound results.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, the high-power approach could shorten procedure time and potentially improve AF freedom from arrhythmia with comparable safety.

How similar studies have gone: Prior research in high-power short-duration ablation has shown mixed results; this study tests whether 90 W with CLOSE protocol offers safety and efficacy advantages over standard power settings.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* Age over 18 years old;
* Atrial fibrillation resistant to antiarrhythmic therapy;
* Paroxysmal form of atrial fibrillation;
* Persistent form of atrial fibrillation;
* The patient's consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

Exclusion Criteria:

* Age under 18 and over 80 years old;
* The presence of another cardiac pathology requiring surgical treatment;
* Congenital heart defects;
* Previous "open" cardiac surgery;
* Bone marrow diseases;
* Pathology of the blood coagulation system;
* The left ventricular ejection fraction is less than 40%;
* Moderate to severe renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance \<50 ml/min);
* Drug-resistant hypertension (despite hypotensive therapy);
* Organically altered mitral valve;
* There are reasons to assume that the patient will not show up for subsequent visits (control points of the study) for various reasons;
* The patient's participation in another clinical trial.

Where it's running

  • Bakulev National Medical Research Center for Cardiovascular Surgery
    Moscow, Russia
    Recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.