Very high-power short-duration vs standard low-power radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation
Official title: Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of High-Power Short-Duration Radiofrequency Ablation and Standard Low-Power Ablation in Catheter Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
Run by Bakulev Scientific Center of Cardiovascular Surgery · NCT07728539 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial tests whether very high-power short-duration ablation (90 W) is as safe and more effective than conventional low-power ablation (35-45 W) for treating atrial fibrillation.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 70 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 196 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Bakulev Scientific Center of Cardiovascular Surgery Government |
| Locations | 1 site (Moscow) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | June 15, 2026 |
| Main results expected | June 1, 2028 |
| Study ends | June 1, 2029 |
| Registry record updated | July 27, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07728539 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults over 18 with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation resistant to antiarrhythmic therapy, suitable for catheter ablation at experienced centers.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with significant structural heart disease, severe renal impairment, or other exclusion criteria may not experience added benefit from the high-power approach.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This randomized, open-label study compares two radiofrequency ablation strategies for pulmonary vein isolation in adults with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation. Participants are assigned to either very high-power short-duration ablation at 90 W or conventional low-power ablation at 35-45 W, using non-fluoroscopic navigation and CLOSE protocol. The trial targets experienced AF centers and plans to enroll 196 patients. Outcomes focus on safety and efficacy of the energy delivery strategies in achieving durable isolation. The study excludes patients with significant comorbidities or organ dysfunction that could confound results.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the high-power approach could shorten procedure time and potentially improve AF freedom from arrhythmia with comparable safety.
How similar studies have gone: Prior research in high-power short-duration ablation has shown mixed results; this study tests whether 90 W with CLOSE protocol offers safety and efficacy advantages over standard power settings.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Age over 18 years old; * Atrial fibrillation resistant to antiarrhythmic therapy; * Paroxysmal form of atrial fibrillation; * Persistent form of atrial fibrillation; * The patient's consent to participate in the study. Exclusion Criteria: Exclusion Criteria: * Age under 18 and over 80 years old; * The presence of another cardiac pathology requiring surgical treatment; * Congenital heart defects; * Previous "open" cardiac surgery; * Bone marrow diseases; * Pathology of the blood coagulation system; * The left ventricular ejection fraction is less than 40%; * Moderate to severe renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance \<50 ml/min); * Drug-resistant hypertension (despite hypotensive therapy); * Organically altered mitral valve; * There are reasons to assume that the patient will not show up for subsequent visits (control points of the study) for various reasons; * The patient's participation in another clinical trial.
Where it's running
-
Bakulev National Medical Research Center for Cardiovascular Surgery
Moscow, Russia Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Andrey Filatov — Bakulev Scientific Center for Cardiovascular Surgery
- Study coordinator: Andrey Filatov
- Email: agfilatov@bakulev.ru
- Phone: +7(495) 414-77-02
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Comparing radiofrequency and cryoablation techniques for treating atrial fibrillation
This study is testing whether radiofrequency or cryoablation works better for treating people with persistent atrial fibrillation who haven't had success with other treatments.
-
Pulsed Field Ablation Outcomes in Atrial Fibrillation: Randomized Comparison to Traditional Ablation
This study tests pulsed field ablation versus conventional radiofrequency ablation in adults with atrial fibrillation to see which method better preserves heart rhythm.
-
Catheter ablation plus LAAC vs anticoagulation in frail elderly A-fib patients
This study tests whether adding left atrial appendage closure to ablation is as good as using long-term blood thinners in frail people aged 75 and up with atrial fibrillation.
-
Atrial fibrillation screening for people with higher-than-median NT-proBNP in Tromsø
This will test whether giving 7-day wearable ECG monitoring to people aged 40+ with NT-proBNP above the median can find atrial fibrillation and reduce ischemic stroke and vascular deaths compared with no long-term monitoring.
-
Watchman Elite Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device in AF patients seeking a non-drug option
This study tests whether the Watchman Elite LAAC device can safely and effectively reduce stroke risk in people with non-valvular atrial fibrillation who want a non-pharmacologic alternative to anticoagulation.
-
Cardiovascular risk in people with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis
This study tests whether people with inflammatory bowel disease have different heart-attack or stroke risk over two years compared with matched controls.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.