Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Interventional Ages 75 and up

Catheter ablation plus LAAC vs anticoagulation in frail elderly A-fib patients

Official title: Randomized Controlled Trial - Catheter Ablation Combined With Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Versus Catheter Ablation Combined With Oral Anticoagulation for Elderly Frailty Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Comparison of Efficacy and Safety

Run by Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital · NCT07441382 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This study tests whether adding left atrial appendage closure to ablation is as good as using long-term blood thinners in frail people aged 75 and up with atrial fibrillation.

More Stroke trials

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
Ages75 Years and up
SexAll
Enrollment200 (estimated)
SponsorGuangdong Provincial People's Hospital
Academic / other
Locations1 site (Guangzhou, Guangdong)
StatusRecruiting
StartedMarch 24, 2026
Main results expectedMay 1, 2027
Study endsMarch 1, 2028
Registry record updatedJune 8, 2026
Trial IDNCT07441382 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Ideal candidates are adults aged 75 or older with non-valvular AF, high stroke risk (CHA2DS2-VASc ≥ 3), and eligibility for ablation and LAAC, including ability to tolerate the antithrombotic regimen.

Probably not a fit

Patients with contraindications to LAAC or to the antithrombotic regimen, or those unlikely to benefit from stroke risk reduction, may see no advantage.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This multicenter, open-label trial compares two strategies for stroke prevention in frail elderly patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Participants are randomized to receive catheter ablation with left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAC) or catheter ablation with ongoing oral anticoagulation (OAC). The study enlists about 200 participants and uses stratified randomization with procedures performed by experienced operators to reflect real-world practice. Primary aims focus on safety and efficacy of LAAC in combination with ablation relative to standard anticoagulation after ablation. Follow-up assessments monitor stroke, bleeding, and other cardiovascular outcomes over time.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, patients may benefit from a reduced risk of stroke and less bleeding, by avoiding lifelong anticoagulation when feasible.

How similar studies have gone: Prior studies suggest LAAC approaches can reduce stroke risk in AF; this trial tests a combined ablation-LAAC strategy in a frail elderly cohort, which remains an area with limited prior data.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: (1) Age ≥ 75 years. (2) Confirmed diagnosis of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (paroxysmal or persistent). (3) CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 3 (high risk of stroke) . (4) Procedure-related criteria: Sequential Group: Participants who have received catheter ablation for non-valvular AF within 90 to 180 days prior to randomization. One-stop Group: Participants who are scheduled to undergo clinically indicated catheter ablation within 10 days after randomization. (5) Judged by the investigator to be able to tolerate the defined antithrombotic drug regimen. (6) Suitable to undergo Transesophageal Echocardiography (TEE) or Pulmonary Vein Computed Tomography (CT). (7) Able and willing to sign the written informed consent form. (8) Willing to return for all scheduled follow-up visits and examinations. Exclusion Criteria: (1) Presence of thrombus in the left atrium or left atrial appendage identified on preoperative imaging (echocardiogram, pulmonary vein CT, etc). (2) Major bleeding event (per ISTH definition) within 14 days prior to randomization. Participants must be excluded if clinical sequelae persist or if interventions for the bleeding source are planned/pending, regardless of the time elapsed since the event. (3) Requirement for long-term oral anticoagulation (OAC) for reasons other than stroke risk reduction in AF (e.g., underlying hypercoagulable state) that would prevent OAC discontinuation post-device implantation. (4) Any cardiac or major non-cardiac intervention/surgery (excluding AF ablation and cardioversion) performed within 30 days prior to, or scheduled within 60 days after randomization. This includes but is not limited to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) or other cardiac ablations. (5) Life expectancy \< 2 years, malignancy, infectious endocarditis, uncontrolled infection, or physiological evidence of cardiac tamponade. (6) Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) score of 1-3 (not frail) or 7-9 (severely frail/terminally ill). (7) Deemed unsuitable for long-term anticoagulation and/or antiplatelet therapy by the investigator due to bleeding risk, allergies, or other reasons. (8) Current participation in another clinical trial that interferes with this study, excluding mandatory government or purely observational registries. (9) Stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 60 days prior to randomization. (10) Documented myocardial infarction (NSTEMI or STEMI) within 90 days prior to randomization, regardless of intervention. (11) History of atrial septal defect (ASD) repair or presence of an ASD/Patent Foramen Ovale (PFO) occluder. (12) Presence of a mechanical prosthetic valve in any position. (13) Participants of childbearing potential who are pregnant or planning pregnancy during the study period. (14) Medical or anatomical contraindications to percutaneous catheter-based interventions. (15) Documented NYHA Class IV heart failure. (16) History of surgical left atrial appendage (LAA) closure.

Transthoracic Echocardiography (TTE) Specific Exclusions: (1) Low LVEF: Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \< 30%. (2) Presence of pericardial effusion with a circumferential echo-free space \> 5mm. (3) Presence of high-risk PFO associated with an atrial septal aneurysm (ASA) with an excursion or length \> 15mm. (4) Presence of high-risk PFO with a large shunt (defined as appearance of microbubbles within 3 cardiac cycles and/or a substantial count of microbubbles). (5) Presence of moderate or severe mitral stenosis (mitral valve area \< 1.5 cm2).

Where it's running

  • Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital
    Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
    Recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.