Vasoactive Agents in Pulmonary Hypertension Crisis
Official title: Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Dopamine, Norepinephrine and Epinephrine in the Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertensive Crisis Under Hemodynamic Monitoring
Run by China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases · NCT07667829 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial tests whether dopamine, norepinephrine, or epinephrine can safely and effectively help people with a pulmonary hypertension crisis who are in the hospital.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 75 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases Government |
| Locations | 3 sites (Beijing, Beijing Municipality and 2 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | August 19, 2026 |
| Main results expected | December 31, 2028 |
| Study ends | January 31, 2029 |
| Registry record updated | October 30, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07667829 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults over 18 with confirmed PAH or CTEPH who are hospitalized and have not yet received any study vasopressors.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients not experiencing a pulmonary hypertension crisis or those with contraindications to the study drugs may not benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This prospective, randomized trial compares three vasoactive drugs—dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine—for treating patients experiencing a pulmonary hypertension crisis. Haemodynamic monitoring guides the assessment of each drug’s safety and effectiveness. Eligible adults with PAH or CTEPH who are in hospital and have not yet received any of the study drugs are randomized to receive one of the agents. The study aims to identify which agent provides the best balance of blood pressure support and oxygen delivery while minimizing adverse events. Conducted at major Chinese centers, the trial emphasizes in-hospital management and continuous safety monitoring.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the trial could identify the most effective and safe vasopressor strategy for supporting patients during a pulmonary hypertension crisis.
How similar studies have gone: Prior research in similar settings has explored vasoactive drugs, but this study addresses a specific crisis scenario with randomized comparison among three agents.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age \> 18 years old; 2. Signed informed consent form; 3. Confirmed diagnosis of arterial pulmonary hypertension (PAH) and/or chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH); 4. Presenting with manifestations of pulmonary hypertensive crisis; 5. Receiving both diagnosis and treatment in-hospital; 6. No intravenous administration of the vasopressor drugs (including dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine) under study at enrollment. Exclusion Criteria: 1. At SCAI stage D or stage E ; 2. Patients who only receive a diagnosis but no treatment in the hospital; 3. Uncontrolled hyperthyroidism; 4. Complicated with angle-closure glaucoma; 5. Hypersensitivity to the study drug; 6. Ongoing use of halogenated hydrocarbon general anesthetics such as cyclopropane and halothane; 7. Ongoing use of monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) antidepressants or anti-Parkinson drugs (phenelzine, tranylcypromine, isocarboxazid, moclobemide); 8. Pregnancy; 9. Already receiving the vasopressor drugs (dopamine, norepinephrine, epinephrine) under study at enrollment.
Where it's running
-
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China Recruiting -
Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China Not yet recruiting -
Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University
Wuhan, Wuhan, China Not yet recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Qing Gu,MD
- Email: guqingfw@126.com
- Phone: +86 010-88392814
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Impact of ambient air vs nasal liquid oxygen on exercise performance in pulmonary vascular disease
This study tests whether using nasal liquid oxygen during a 6-minute walk test changes how far patients with PAH or CTEPH can walk compared to breathing room air.
-
Liquid oxygen vs ambient air during a 6-minute walk in people with pulmonary vascular disease
This study tests whether walking with liquid oxygen at about 4 L/min helps or hinders distance walked compared with walking on room air in adults with PAH or CTEPH living in Switzerland.
-
Levosimendan to see if it helps the heart after PEA in CTEPH
This small randomized trial tests whether giving levosimendan around surgery helps reduce pulmonary artery pressure and support right heart function after pulmonary endarterectomy for CTEPH.
-
Sleep problems in PAH patients: how sleep breathing relates to PAH outcomes
This study tests how sleep-disordered breathing and nocturnal oxygen changes relate to outcomes in adults with pulmonary arterial hypertension.
-
Treprostinil inhalation powder for PAH patients switching from selexipag
This study tests whether inhaled treprostinil (LIQ861) is safe and tolerable for adults with PAH who are moving from oral selexipag to inhaled therapy.
-
Escalation options for PAH patients already on dual therapy
This trial tests whether adding a prostacyclin pathway drug or increasing sildenafil dose helps PAH patients at intermediate-to-high risk who aren’t at low risk despite dual therapy.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.