Using vibration and low‑intensity electrical pulses to improve arm proprioception after stroke
Official title: Investigating the Impact of Afferent Stimulation on Proprioceptive Function in Post-Stroke Rehabilitation
Run by Universidad Rey Juan Carlos · NCT07073989 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This project tests whether a wearable device that delivers gentle vibrations and low‑intensity electrical pulses can improve arm position and movement sense in people with chronic stroke, with healthy volunteers included for comparison.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 20 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Universidad Rey Juan Carlos Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Móstoles, Madrid) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | June 17, 2025 |
| Main results expected | September 2025 |
| Study ends | September 2025 |
| Registry record updated | July 20, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT07073989 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal participants are adults with chronic ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke causing hemiparesis and mild‑to‑moderate upper‑limb impairment (Fugl‑Meyer upper‑limb 35–53) with MMSE >24 and the cognitive ability to follow instructions, and healthy volunteers without upper‑limb or neurological conditions for comparison.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with severe upper‑limb impairment, recent upper‑limb surgery, significant cognitive impairment (MMSE ≤24), acute stroke, or other unstable medical/orthopedic conditions are unlikely to benefit from this protocol.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This interventional study applies afferent stimulation—mechanical vibrations combined with low‑intensity electrical currents—to deliver enhanced proprioceptive feedback to the upper limb. Sessions will compare responses in people with chronic stroke and in healthy volunteers to characterize device effects and baseline sensory function. Eligible stroke participants have chronic ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke with mild‑to‑moderate upper‑limb impairment and sufficient cognition (MMSE >24). Outcome measures will include standardized upper‑limb motor and sensory scores such as the Fugl‑Meyer upper‑limb sections and functional performance tests conducted at Universidad Rey Juan Carlos.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the device could improve patients' sense of arm position and movement and potentially speed or enhance recovery of upper‑limb function.
How similar studies have gone: Prior small studies using sensory stimulation, vibration, or low‑intensity electrical inputs have shown promising but mixed improvements in proprioception and motor control, so the approach is plausible but not yet definitively proven.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * For healthy subjects: 1. No neurological or orthopedic conditions affecting upper limb movement. 2. No surgical interventions on the upper limbs within the past 6 months. 3. General physical condition adequate to perform the session. 4. Cognitive abilities sufficient to understand and carry out the experimental procedure. * For stroke survivors: 1. Ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke resulting in motor impairments in the upper limb. 2. Chronic stroke condition. 3. Subjects with sufficient cognitive abilities to follow instructions and actively participate in the therapy. 4. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score \> 24. 5. Subjects presenting hemiparesis and mild-to-moderate impairment in the upper limb (score on the Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment for the upper limb, sections A-D, between 35 and 53 points). The maximum score on the FM scale is 66, with the following severity classifications: * 0-15: severe impairment * 16-34: moderate-to-severe impairment * 35-53: mild-to-moderate impairment * 54-66: mild impairment 6. Subjects presenting upper limb hypertonia with a score below 3 on the Modified Ashworth Scale. 7\. Subjects who have signed the informed consent document to voluntarily participate in the experiments. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Acute musculoskeletal disorders. 2. Peripheral vascular diseases. 3. Acute cardiopulmonary conditions. 4. Acute neurological disorders. 5. Restricted mobility of upper limb joints due to any cause. 6. Pain as a cause of impaired upper limb mobility.
Where it's running
-
Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
Móstoles, Madrid, Spain Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Julio S. Lora Millán, PhD in Automation and Robotics
- Email: julio.lora@urjc.es
- Phone: 914880000
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Task-oriented training plus NDT vs high-intensity gait training plus NDT for chronic stroke walking
In adults with chronic stroke, the study tests whether adding structured, high-repetition task-oriented training or high-intensity gait training to neurodevelopmental treatment improves walking ability more than NDT alone.
-
Action Observation Therapy for Chronic Stroke via Telerehabilitation
This study tests whether watching and then imitating simple daily actions through a home-based telerehabilitation program improves hand function and quality of life for adults with chronic stroke.
-
Unimanual vs. Bimanual Action Observation Therapy for Chronic Stroke Upper-Limb Recovery
This study tests whether action observation therapy using one hand or both hands improves arm function and daily living in adults with chronic stroke.
-
CONUT score and its link to balance and everyday function after chronic stroke.
This will see if the CONUT nutritional score and measures of muscle and bone relate to balance and daily function in adults at least six months after a stroke.
-
Comparing constraint-induced movement therapy and bilateral training to improve arm and hand use after chronic stroke
This tests whether restraining the unaffected arm plus electrical stimulation or training both arms together with electrical stimulation better reduces wrist tightness and improves hand use in adults with chronic stroke.
-
Gait data collection using wearable sensors and motion capture to test gait events
This study tests how well wearable IMU sensors can detect gait events by comparing them to gold-standard motion capture in healthy adults.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.