Unilateral vs. Bilateral Spinal Anesthesia for Hip Replacement in Older Adults
Official title: Comparison of the Hemodynamic Effects of Bilateral and Unilateral Spinal Anesthesia in Hip Arthroplasty Surgeries in Elderly Patients Using the Continuous Pressure Recording Analytical Method.
Run by Kayseri City Hospital · NCT07789795 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial tests whether unilateral spinal anesthesia provides better hemodynamic stability than bilateral spinal anesthesia in people 65 and older undergoing hip replacement.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 65 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 74 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Kayseri City Hospital Government |
| Locations | 1 site (Kayseri, Kayseri) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | May 1, 2026 |
| Main results expected | August 31, 2026 |
| Study ends | August 31, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | August 27, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07789795 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults aged 65 years and older scheduled for elective total hip arthroplasty with ASA II–IV, suitable arterial anatomy for PRAM monitoring, and no contraindications to spinal anesthesia.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with contraindications to unilateral spinal anesthesia, significant spinal deformities, or those not achieving adequate hemodynamic stability may not benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
In this randomized study, 74 older adults undergoing elective total hip arthroplasty are assigned to receive either unilateral or bilateral spinal anesthesia. Hemodynamic parameters such as cardiac output, stroke volume, and vascular resistance are continuously monitored using PRAM-based MostCare software through a radial arterial line. The trial also records intraoperative fluid requirements and vasopressor use to compare cardiovascular stability between the two anesthesia techniques. Standard sedation is given before spinal anesthesia, and eligibility requires adequate arterial anatomy and consent. Findings will inform whether unilateral spinal anesthesia may offer cardiovascular advantages in this high-risk population.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If unilateral spinal anesthesia proves more stable, patients could experience fewer hypotensive episodes and reduced need for fluids and vasopressors during hip surgery.
How similar studies have gone: Previous evidence on unilateral versus bilateral spinal anesthesia in elderly patients is limited; this study addresses a relatively novel comparison with advanced hemodynamic monitoring.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Adults aged 65 years and older. 2. Patients scheduled for elective total hip arthroplasty. 3. Patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification of II, III, or IV. 4. Patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 13-15 who are conscious and able to cooperate. 5. Patients with suitable peripheral arterial anatomy for PRAM monitoring. 6. Patients who provide written informed consent to participate in the study. 7. Patients without any clinical contraindication to spinal anesthesia. - Exclusion Criteria: 1. Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score \<13. 2. Age below 65 years. 3. History of previous major neurosurgical intervention. 4. Anatomical abnormality, vascular defect, or infection at the site intended for arterial catheter placement for PRAM monitoring. 5. Severe spinal deformity (e.g., severe scoliosis, previous spinal fusion surgery, or spinal trauma). 6. Current anticoagulant therapy or coagulopathy (INR \>1.5 or platelet count \<75,000/mm³). 7. Presence of skin infection or systemic infection/sepsis. 8. Severe hypovolemia or decompensated cardiac disease in which spinal anesthesia is contraindicated. 9. Known allergy or hypersensitivity to local anesthetics or sedative agents. 10. Local infection or wound at the planned spinal puncture site. 11. Clinical contraindication to spinal anesthesia (e.g., increased intracranial pressure, septicemia, or severe hypotension). -
Where it's running
-
Kayseri City Hospital
Kayseri, Kayseri, Turkey (Türkiye) Recruiting
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Modified Saddle Block vs Spinal Anesthesia for TURP
This study tests whether a modified saddle block or a standard spinal anesthesia better controls blood pressure during TURP for adults 40–90.
-
Dexamethasone and Spinal Block Duration in Lower Abdominal Surgery
This study tests whether giving dexamethasone before spinal anesthesia can lengthen how long the numbness lasts for adults having lower abdominal surgery.
-
Pupil light reflex to predict low blood pressure after spinal anesthesia in cesarean deliveries
Doctors want to see if a quick eye-pupil test done before spinal anesthesia can predict who might develop low blood pressure after a cesarean delivery.
-
Patient-controlled remimazolam sedation under spinal anesthesia for hip replacement
In adults having hip replacement with spinal anesthesia, this study tests whether letting patients control their own sedation with remimazolam works as well as standard clinician-controlled sedation.
-
Right heart function after cardiac surgery: does respiratory acidosis matter?
This study looks at whether respiratory acidosis after heart surgery affects how well the right side of the heart works in ICU patients.
-
Sedation with dexmedetomidine, propofol, or both during cataract surgery
This project will test whether dexmedetomidine, propofol, or their combination (each given with fentanyl) provides the best sedation, safety, and surgeon satisfaction for adults having cataract surgery.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.