Restrained vs Gripping Wrist Restraints for Cesarean Delivery
Official title: A Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) Comparing Restrained vs Gripping String Techniques on Patients Undergoing Cesarean Delivery
Run by Ohio State University · NCT07772219 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study tests whether a soft wrist-level gripping restraint reduces anxiety for adults having an elective cesarean delivery under spinal or combined spinal-epidural anesthesia.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | Women only |
| Enrollment | 272 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Ohio State University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Columbus, Ohio) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | July 9, 2026 |
| Main results expected | December 31, 2029 |
| Study ends | December 31, 2029 |
| Registry record updated | August 19, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07772219 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults aged 18–50 undergoing elective cesarean delivery with neuraxial anesthesia and English proficiency, in singleton term pregnancies.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients not experiencing anxiety changes related to restraint placement or those receiving different anesthesia/clinical pathways may have no benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This randomized, single-center trial compares two upper-extremity restraint configurations during elective cesarean delivery under neuraxial anesthesia. Participants are assigned to either standard forearm restraints or wrist-level gripping restraints, with care taken to maintain safety and comfort. Anxiety will be measured at multiple perioperative time points using the STAI-6, and secondary outcomes include pain, satisfaction, vital signs, mood after delivery, and any restraint-related safety events. The aim is to determine if the wrist-level restraint improves the perioperative experience compared with the forearm restraint. The study is conducted at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, with a 1:1 randomization and standardized procedures.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the wrist-level gripping restraint could reduce perioperative anxiety and improve the patient experience for women undergoing cesarean delivery.
How similar studies have gone: Prior research in similar settings has explored patient comfort and anxiety with restraint methods, but this specific wrist-level gripping approach is novel in cesarean delivery.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Age ≥18 years to 50 years old * Singleton pregnancy * Term gestation (≥37 weeks) * Spinal or combined spinal-epidural anesthesia planned * Scheduled for elective cesarean delivery * Ability to provide informed consent in English Exclusion Criteria: * Not receiving neuraxial anesthesia or not scheduled for cesarean delivery * Preeclampsia * Documented fetal anomaly/congenital malformations * Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) * Unable to provide informed consent in English without interpreting services or personnel * Prisoners * Elects for skin-to-skin contact prior to suturing
Where it's running
-
The Ohio State University Hospitals
Columbus, Ohio, United States Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Ling-Qun Hu, MD
- Email: LingQun.Hu@osumc.edu
- Phone: 614-293-8000
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Dexmedetomidine or Clonidine added to spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery
This study tests whether adding dexmedetomidine or clonidine to spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery improves intraoperative comfort and analgesia.
-
Video-Only vs Standard Informed Consent for Amniocentesis or CVS in Pregnant Women
This study tests whether video-based education helps reduce anxiety and improve decision readiness for invasive prenatal testing in pregnant women.
-
Cesarean Anesthesia Blood Gas
This study tests and compares blood gas parameters in moms and babies when cesarean deliveries are done with spinal vs general anesthesia.
-
Buprenorphine vs morphine for pain control after cesarean delivery
This study tests whether intrathecal buprenorphine provides better postcesarean pain relief than morphine for women undergoing a planned cesarean delivery.
-
Pupil light reflex to predict low blood pressure after spinal anesthesia in cesarean deliveries
Doctors want to see if a quick eye-pupil test done before spinal anesthesia can predict who might develop low blood pressure after a cesarean delivery.
-
Arm versus ankle mean arterial pressure during elective cesarean delivery
This study will see if a blood pressure cuff on the ankle gives similar mean arterial pressure readings to a standard arm cuff in pregnant people having a planned C-section under spinal anesthesia.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.