Pressure Biofeedback vs Bolster Foam Feedback for Knee Osteoarthritis
Official title: Effects of Pressure Biofeedback Training Versus Bolster Foam Roll Training for Pain, Muscle Activation and Quality of Life Among Knee Osteoarthritis Patients
Run by Lahore University of Biological and Applied Sciences · NCT07731737 · Data updated 2026-11-12
We’re testing whether pressure biofeedback training helps people with knee osteoarthritis improve pain, function, and muscle activation more than bolster foam feedback over eight weeks.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 45 Years to 65 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 48 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Lahore University of Biological and Applied Sciences Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Lahore) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | May 1, 2026 |
| Main results expected | August 15, 2026 |
| Study ends | October 15, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | July 28, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07731737 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults aged 45–65 with Grade II knee osteoarthritis, experiencing pain at least 3/10 in the past week and meeting specified clinical criteria.
✕Probably not a fit
Results may show no additional benefit from pressure biofeedback compared with bolster foam feedback for some patients.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This randomized, single-blinded study assigns 48 adults with Grade II knee osteoarthritis to either Pressure Biofeedback training or Bolster Foam Roll training. Participants will receive supervised sessions three times weekly for eight weeks, with assessments at baseline, week 4, week 8, and week 12 to measure pain, function, and muscle activation. The trial aims to determine if the visual target provided by pressure biofeedback offers superior outcomes compared with traditional tactile feedback. Both groups will perform a standard baseline exercise program, with differences during the targeted isometric phase. The study will be conducted at Sir Ganga Ram Hospital and Mayo Hospital Lahore.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, patients may experience greater pain relief and improved knee function through enhanced muscle activation.
How similar studies have gone: Previous rehabilitation studies using biofeedback have shown variable improvements; the added visual target is a relatively novel approach in this context.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Patient diagnosis with Grade II knee Osteoarthritis. Age between 45 and 65 years, encompassing the typical onset of symptomatic OA. Both genders Male and Female are included. Symptomatic patients meeting the following American College of Rheumatology criteria: average pain score ≥ 3 in the last week on the numerical rating scale, morning stiffness \< 30 min, and joint crepitus Exclusion Criteria: History of knee surgery (TKA, HTO, ACLR) or arthroscopy in the affected knee within the last 6 months. Intra-articular corticosteroid or hyaluronic acid injections within the last 3 months. Neurological conditions affecting lower limb motor control (e.g., Stroke, Parkinson's, Radiculopathy). Acute infection, tumor, or fracture around the knee joint. Severe cognitive impairment or inability to follow visual/tactile cues. \-
Where it's running
-
Lahore University of Biological and Applied Sciences
Lahore, Pakistan Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Who — Lahore University of Biological and Applied Sciences
- Study coordinator: Sahar Fatima, Sidra Principal Investigator
- Email: sahar.fatima@ubas.edu.pk
- Phone: +923271202200
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Perturbation-based balance training vs progressive neuromuscular training alongside standard physiotherapy for knee osteoarthritis
This trial tests whether perturbation-based balance training adds benefit over progressive neuromuscular training when used with usual physiotherapy for people with knee osteoarthritis and chronic knee pain.
-
Single-center, first-in-human injection of ceAF for knee osteoarthritis
This early-stage study tests a single knee injection of ceAF to see if it is safe and helps reduce pain and improve function in adults with knee osteoarthritis.
-
Radial Shock Wave Therapy for knee bone marrow edema in people with knee OA
A noninvasive shock wave therapy is tested to see if it helps people aged 40–70 with knee osteoarthritis and bone marrow edema.
-
Platelet-rich plasma added to hyaluronic acid for knee osteoarthritis
This study tests whether a single injection of hyaluronic acid plus autologous platelet-rich plasma helps reduce knee OA symptoms more than hyaluronic acid alone in adults with moderate knee OA.
-
Hyaluronic Acid Plus PRP Injection for Knee Osteoarthritis
This study tests whether a single HA injection combined with a patient’s own PRP is better at easing knee OA pain than HA alone.
-
Motivational Interviewing Plus Exercise for knee osteoarthritis
This study tests whether adding motivational interviewing to a neuromuscular and home exercise program helps people with knee osteoarthritis improve pain control and get more active.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.