Pre-emptive LAVA-ECMO support for complex, high-risk TAVR
Official title: PROspective Evaluation of Pre-empTive Left Atrial Venoarterial Extra-Corporeal Membrane oxygenaTion for Complex High-risk Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: PROTECT-TAVR
Run by Atlantic Health System · NCT07309029 · Data updated 2026-11-12
The team will try pre-emptive left atrial veno-arterial ECMO to stabilize adults with severe aortic stenosis undergoing complex, high-risk TAVR who are unstable or at risk of instability.
Quick facts
| Study type | Observational |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 100 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 30 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Atlantic Health System Academic / other |
| Locations | 2 sites (Detroit, Michigan and 1 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | January 1, 2026 |
| Main results expected | May 30, 2027 |
| Study ends | June 30, 2027 |
| Registry record updated | December 30, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT07309029 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults with severe aortic stenosis scheduled for complex or high-risk TAVR who meet Class III hemodynamic criteria or have Type B/C anatomic complexity with Class II hemodynamics.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients having routine, low-risk TAVR who are hemodynamically stable or those with contraindications to ECMO are unlikely to benefit from pre-emptive LAVA-ECMO.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This is a single-arm, prospective, multi-center study enrolling adults undergoing complex or high-risk transcatheter aortic valve replacement who meet predefined hemodynamic or anatomic risk criteria. Participants receive pre-emptive LAVA-ECMO cannulation prior to or during the TAVR procedure and are followed through their in-hospital course. The primary composite outcome includes in-hospital death, intraprocedural cardiac arrest, or need for emergent cardiac surgery, with secondary safety endpoints capturing major vascular, bleeding, and cardiac structural complications. Eligible patients are screened based on Class III hemodynamic instability or Type B/C anatomic complexity with Class II hemodynamic risk.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, pre-emptive LAVA-ECMO could reduce in-hospital deaths, intraprocedural cardiac arrests, and emergency surgeries by providing immediate circulatory support during high-risk TAVR.
How similar studies have gone: Small case series and observational reports have described ECMO use during TAVR, but pre-emptive LAVA-ECMO in this specific high-risk population is relatively novel and lacks robust prospective evidence.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
\- Patients are required to have either a Class III hemodynamic status OR type B or type C anatomical complexity with Class II (at risk) hemodynamics (Figure 2).
* Hemodynamic Criteria
* Major Criteria (Class III)
* Systolic blood pressure \<90 mmHg or MAP\<60 mmHg
* Need for vasopressors or inotropes to maintain MAP\>60 mmHg
* Evidence of end-organ damage including: acute kidney injury, liver dysfunction, elevated lactate or altered mentation
* Minor Criteria (Class II)
* Left ventricular ejection fraction \<35%
* Pulmonary hypertension (pulmonary artery systolic pressure \>60 mmHg) with right ventricular dysfunction
* Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure \>30 mmHg
* Anatomic criteria
* Major Criteria (Type C)
* Native or valve-in-valve TAVR requiring single-leaflet modification for a large area of myocardium at risk (e.g. patients with large or dominant left circulation)
* Native or valve-in-valve TAVR requiring dual-leaflet modification
* Severe bioprosthetic aortic regurgitation
* Severe 3-vessel coronary artery disease not amenable to revascularization (SYNTAX score \>33)
* Minor Criteria (Type B)
* Native or valve-in-valve TAVR requiring single-leaflet modification
* Severe commissural misalignment requiring leaflet modification
* High-risk for coronary occlusion not amenable to leaflet modification
* Critical low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis (defined as an estimated aortic valve area ≤0.5 cm2)
Exclusion Criteria:
* Age \<18 or pregnant
* General absolute contraindications to TAVR
* Severe peripheral artery disease with infeasibility for veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation implantation.
* Contraindications to transeptal cannulation (e.g. pre-existing interatrial septum occluder device).
* Pre-existing Impella treatment.
* Onset of shock \>12 hours.
* Preceding cardiac arrest with prolonged resuscitation (\>40 minutes).
* Other severe concomitant disease with life expectancy \<6 months.
* Participation in another trial with an intervention.
* Any class I hemodynamic status
* Type A anatomical complexity with class I or II hemodynamic status
Where it's running
-
Center for Structural Heart Disease Henry Ford Hospital
Detroit, Michigan, United States Recruiting -
Valve and Structural Heart Center Morristown Medical Center
Morristown, New Jersey, United States Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Gennaro Giustino, MD
- Email: Gennaro.Giustino@atlantichealth.org
- Phone: 9739718858
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Factors Influencing Outcomes in ECMO and Impella Patients
This study tests whether metabolic and thyroid hormone changes help predict survival for adults on ECMO or Impella at a single Hungarian cardiac ICU.
-
Evaluating a noninvasive tissue sensor to detect cardiogenic shock earlier in heart patients
This pilot, noninvasive study tests whether the NIRSense wearable can help detect deterioration in adults with cardiogenic shock risk due to heart attack or heart failure.
-
Safety and Efficacy of an Extracorporeal Ventricular Assist System for Cardiogenic Shock
This study tests whether an extracorporeal ventricular assist device can safely provide short-term heart support and help patients with cardiogenic shock or trouble weaning from bypass.
-
Left Ventricular Support and Advanced Monitoring in AMI–Cardiogenic Shock: Immediate Impella Use and PAC/Monitoring vs Standard Care
In adults with heart attack-related cardiogenic shock, this trial tests whether using an Impella left ventricular assist device and/or protocolized pulmonary artery catheter monitoring improves survival compared with standard care.
-
CRP Apheresis for infarct-related cardiogenic shock
This study tests whether selectively removing C-reactive protein with apheresis, in addition to standard care, helps people with cardiogenic shock after a heart attack.
-
Compare two ventilator modes in adults with cardiac ICU needs and invasive ventilation
This pilot tests whether volume-controlled versus pressure-controlled ventilation can be safely used in adults with heart disease and respiratory failure who need invasive ventilation.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.