Left Ventricular Support and Advanced Monitoring in AMI–Cardiogenic Shock: Immediate Impella Use and PAC/Monitoring vs Standard Care
Official title: Routine Microaxial Flow Pump Versus Radial Access Revascularization Without Routine Microaxial Flow Pump in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock & Routine Pulmonary Artery Catheterization-based Monitoring With Protocolized Hemodynamic Optimization Versus Simplified Monitoring Without Protocolized Hemodynamic Optimization in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock
Run by Leipzig Heart Science gGmbH · NCT07762560 · Data updated 2026-11-12
In adults with heart attack-related cardiogenic shock, this trial tests whether using an Impella left ventricular assist device and/or protocolized pulmonary artery catheter monitoring improves survival compared with standard care.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 80 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 780 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Leipzig Heart Science gGmbH Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Leipzig, Saxony) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | October 31, 2026 |
| Main results expected | October 2030 |
| Study ends | April 2037 |
| Registry record updated | November 9, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07762560 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock who are planned for immediate angiography/revascularization and meet all inclusion criteria.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with longer shock duration, non-AMI shock causes, or certain exclusion criteria may not benefit from these strategies.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This randomized, 2x2 factorial interventional study compares four treatment strategies for acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. It evaluates immediate mechanical circulatory support with a microaxial flow pump (Impella) after PCI, and protocol-based hemodynamic monitoring using a pulmonary artery catheter, versus conventional monitoring. Participants are assigned to one of four combinations to see if mechanical support and/or advanced monitoring reduce mortality. Outcomes focus on survival and hemodynamic stabilization in AMI-CS patients. The trial is conducted with multiple collaborators led by Leipzig Heart Science gGmbH.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the approach could improve survival and stabilization for AMI-CS patients by guiding rapid mechanical support and precise hemodynamic management.
How similar studies have gone: Prior work in mechanical support and advanced monitoring has shown signals of benefit in similar high-risk cardiac populations, but this exact 2x2 factorial approach in AMI-CS is novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Cardiogenic shock complicating AMI (STEMI or NSTEMI) plus obligatory all 4 of these: 1. Planned immediate angiography and revascularization (preferred PCI) 2. Systolic blood pressure \<100 mmHg or catecholamines required to maintain pressure \>90 mmHg during systole 3. Arterial lactate \>2.0 mmol/L 4. Echocardiogram with LVEF \<40% or left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral (LVOT-VTI) ≤12 cm Exclusion Criteria: 1. Age \<18 and \>80 years 2. Shock duration \>12 hours 3. Other causes of shock (hypovolemia, sepsis, pulmonary embolism or anaphylaxis). 4. Shock due to mechanical complication of AMI 5. Witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) with chest compression \>10 min in total (cardiac arrest occurring in ambulance or after hospital arrival is NOT an exclusion criterion and witnessed OHCA with duration of chest compression \<10 min are also eligible) 6. After 390 included patients with OHCA, any OHCA will be an exclusion criterion 7. Any unwitnessed OHCA 8. Refractory cardiac arrest with ongoing chest compression 9. Evidence of severe right ventricular failure 10. Severe aorta valve regurgitation/stenosis 11. Severe peripheral arterial obstructive disease precluding mAFP placement 12. Abnormalities of the aorta precluding mAFP device placement 13. Presence of a mechanical aortic valve prosthesis 14. Left ventricular thrombus 15. Infective endocarditis 16. Life expectancy \<1 year due to comorbidities 17. Mental disorder or language barrier that preclude informed consent 18. Known pregnancy
Where it's running
-
Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig
Leipzig, Saxony, Germany Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Holger Thiele, Prof. Dr. med. — Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig
- Study coordinator: DOUBLE SHOCK Leipzig Heart Science gGmbH
- Email: DOUBLE-SHOCK@leipzig-heart.de
- Phone: +49 341 865 251542
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
CRP Apheresis for infarct-related cardiogenic shock
This study tests whether selectively removing C-reactive protein with apheresis, in addition to standard care, helps people with cardiogenic shock after a heart attack.
-
Magenta Elevate™ device for cardiogenic shock
This trial tries the Magenta Elevate™ device to see if it can safely support people with cardiogenic shock caused by left ventricular failure.
-
Hemodynamic resuscitation with a Swan-Ganz catheter in cardiogenic shock.
This will try using a Swan‑Ganz (pulmonary artery) catheter to guide medicines and fluids in adults who have cardiogenic shock after a heart attack.
-
Heart@Home: Safe, at-home care for people with acute heart problems compared with hospital care
This trial tests whether hospital-level care at home can safely and effectively treat adults with acute heart conditions who would normally be in the hospital.
-
Factors Influencing Outcomes in ECMO and Impella Patients
This study tests whether metabolic and thyroid hormone changes help predict survival for adults on ECMO or Impella at a single Hungarian cardiac ICU.
-
Can 1-Hz rTMS help with heart rhythm and inflammation after a heart attack?
This trial tests whether daily 1-Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation can improve heart rate variability and reduce inflammation in people who have had an acute myocardial infarction, compared with a sham procedure.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.