Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Observational Ages 18 and up

Non-contrast MRA vs Carotid Doppler for detecting carotid artery narrowing in stroke or TIA

Official title: Comparison Between Non-contrast Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Carotid Doppler in Cerebrovascular Stroke

Run by Sohag University · NCT07756775 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This study tests whether non-contrast MRA can match or improve upon carotid Doppler in finding and grading carotid artery narrowing in adults with ischemic stroke or TIA.

More Ischemic Stroke trials

Quick facts

Study typeObservational
Ages18 Years and up
SexAll
Enrollment200 (estimated)
SponsorSohag University
Academic / other
Locations1 site (Sohag, Sohag Governorate)
StatusRecruiting
StartedJuly 20, 2026
Main results expectedFebruary 28, 2027
Study endsMarch 20, 2027
Registry record updatedAugust 11, 2026
Trial IDNCT07756775 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Adults 18 years and older with a clinically diagnosed ischemic stroke or TIA, imaged within 7–14 days of symptom onset, who are stable and eligible for MRI.

Probably not a fit

Patients with contraindications to MRI or severe claustrophobia, or those with prior carotid stenting, may not benefit from NC-MRA in this study.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This prospective observational study enrolls 200 adults with ischemic stroke or TIA to compare non-contrast magnetic resonance angiography (NC-MRA) and carotid Doppler ultrasonography for detecting and grading carotid stenosis using NASCET criteria. Each participant undergoes both imaging tests within 7–14 days of symptom onset, and results are analyzed for agreement and clinical utility. The goal is to determine how well NC-MRA performs relative to Doppler and to inform imaging strategies for cerebrovascular assessment. The study is conducted at Sohag University Hospital with Sohag University as the lead sponsor.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, NC-MRA could provide an alternative imaging option that complements or replaces Doppler in certain patients, potentially streamlining diagnosis and management.

How similar studies have gone: Prior work comparing imaging modalities for carotid stenosis supports usefulness of noninvasive MRI approaches, though direct head‑to‑head data with NC-MRA vs Doppler in this exact context remains limited.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* Adults aged 18 years or older.
* Clinically diagnosed ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA).
* Imaging performed within 7-14 days of symptom onset.
* Hemodynamically stable and suitable for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
* Able and willing to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Hemorrhagic stroke.
* Previous carotid artery stenting.
* Contraindications to MRI, including:

  * Non-MRI-compatible pacemakers or other MRI-incompatible implants.
  * Cochlear implants.
  * MRI-incompatible metallic orthopedic implants.
  * Severe claustrophobia.

Where it's running

  • Sohag University Hospital
    Sohag, Sohag Governorate, Egypt
    Recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.