Mako-MORE Registry: Real-world Outcomes After Knee and Hip Arthroplasty
Official title: A Prospective, Multi-center, Post-market, Registry-based Evaluation of the Clinical Outcomes in Patients Receiving a Stryker Implant With Use of the Mako Robotic-Arm Assisted System (Mako-MORE)
Run by Stryker Orthopaedics · NCT07647354 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This registry collects real-world data from adults having hip or knee joint replacement with or without the Mako robotic system to see how they do over up to five years.
Quick facts
| Study type | Observational |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 950 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Stryker Orthopaedics Industry-sponsored |
| Locations | 5 sites (Jacksonville, Florida and 4 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | July 13, 2026 |
| Main results expected | May 15, 2033 |
| Study ends | March 15, 2037 |
| Registry record updated | August 18, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07647354 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults aged 18 or older scheduled for manual or Mako robotic-arm assisted hip or knee arthroplasty who can consent and comply with follow-up visits.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients unable to provide informed consent or complete follow-up, or those not undergoing the specified arthroplasty procedures, may not experience study-related benefits.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
The Mako-MORE Registry is a prospective, post-market study across multiple centers that tracks patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty with Stryker implants, using either Mako Robotic-Arm Assisted or manual techniques. It collects demographics, surgical details, patient-reported outcomes, health utility, radiographs, and adverse events. Patients are followed from before surgery through five years after the procedure to describe real-world safety and outcomes. Neither the devices nor the procedures are experimental; all practices align with FDA-cleared labeling and standard care. The study includes both Mako-assisted and manual cohorts to compare real-world performance and safety.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the registry could clarify real-world safety and effectiveness of Mako-assisted arthroplasty and inform clinicians and patients about outcomes in routine care.
How similar studies have gone: Prior registry efforts have demonstrated the value of real-world data in orthopedic implants, with mixed but informative results guiding practice.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * The subject is skeletally mature, and ≥ 18 years old. * The Subject has signed and dated an IRB/EC approved, study specific Informed Patient Consent Form (ICF). * The subject is scheduled to undergo manual arthroplasty or Mako Robotic-Arm Assisted Arthroplasty according to IFU. * The subject is willing and able to comply with postoperative scheduled clinical evaluations. Exclusion Criteria: * The subject is not able to express his/her consent as deemed by the investigator. * The subject is not able to fulfill a self-assessment questionnaire or follow-up visits as deemed by the investigator. * The subject is a prisoner. * Per surgeon discretion the subject is not a candidate for the study. * The subject is pregnant or breastfeeding.
Where it's running
-
UofL Health
Louisville, Kentucky, United States Recruiting -
NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital
New York, New York, United States Recruiting -
Mayo Clinic (Jacksonville)
Jacksonville, Florida, United States Not yet recruiting -
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, United States Not yet recruiting -
Robotic Joint Replacement Institute - Ortho Rhode Island
Wakefield, Rhode Island, United States Not yet recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Yonandy Barrientos
- Email: yonandy.barrientos@stryker.com
- Phone: 347-281-3196
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Breathing exercises before joint surgery
This study is testing if breathing exercises before joint surgery can help patients breathe better after their operation and avoid complications.
-
Spinal anesthesia with intrathecal morphine vs PENG block (with or without dexamethasone) for hip replacement
In people aged 60 and older undergoing total hip arthroplasty, this study tests whether three anesthesia approaches provide better pain control and fewer side effects: spinal with intrathecal morphine, spinal with a PENG block, or spinal with a PENG block plus dexamethasone.
-
Total knee replacement with a polyethylene tibial component to see how long it lasts and how patients do
This study tests the 5-year survival and clinical outcomes of a total knee replacement using an all-polyethylene tibial component in people aged 50–85 with knee osteoarthritis or related conditions.
-
PENG Block or Periarticular Injection for Hip Surgery in Older Adults
This study tests three pain-relief approaches after hip surgery in adults 65 and older to see which best eases pain while keeping movement safe.
-
PENG nerve block plus dexmedetomidine for hip surgery pain in older adults
This will test whether adding a small dose of dexmedetomidine to a PENG nerve block gives longer, better pain relief and reduces opioid need for people 65 and older having hip surgery.
-
Comparing two nerve-block approaches for pain after anterior-approach hip replacement
This trial tests whether adding a lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block or using surgical wound infiltration together with a PENG block gives better pain relief after anterior-approach total hip replacement.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.