Making AI triage more accurate for patients contacting their GP
Official title: Improving the Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence Triage in Primary Care
Run by University of Manchester · NCT07237919 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This project will test whether updated AI in the Patchs online consultation system can make triage decisions more accurate and fair for patients contacting GP practices in England.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 226821 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | University of Manchester Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (London) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | April 1, 2025 |
| Main results expected | April 2029 |
| Study ends | July 2029 |
| Registry record updated | November 20, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT07237919 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Patients registered at GP practices in England that use the Patchs online consultation system and who contact their practice via that system are the source of data for this work.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients registered at practices that do not use Patchs or who do not use online consultations are unlikely to be affected by this project.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
The University of Manchester will collect anonymised data from GP practices using the Patchs online consultation system over four years to study how triage is currently done and where errors occur. Researchers will use historic and current records from practices with Patchs on and off to train and refine AI models, then measure performance changes when the improved AI is switched on. The work includes testing the updated AI across different regions and over time, and checking whether performance differs by patient groups to identify fairness issues. Results will compare AI triage decisions with existing clinical practice and monitor how performance holds up after deployment.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, patients could get faster, more appropriate, and fairer routing to the right care, improving safety and reducing unnecessary waits.
How similar studies have gone: Some commercial AI triage tools are already in use in the NHS, but large-scale, rigorous evidence on accuracy and fairness is currently limited.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * GP practices using the Patchs system Exclusion Criteria: * N/A
Where it's running
-
NHS GP practices
London, United Kingdom Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Benjamin C Brown, MRCGP, PhD
- Email: benjamin.brown@manchester.ac.uk
- Phone: +44 161 306 9966
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
AI-assisted whole-course management for safe medicine use in advanced solid tumors
A real-world study compares a smartphone-based digital management system with usual care to see if it reduces drug-related problems and healthcare needs for adults with advanced solid tumors receiving cancer therapy.
-
AI-assisted and traditional workflows for admission diagnosis and management planning
This trial tests whether an AI-agent workflow helps doctors make better admission diagnoses and care plans on simulated cases, compared with plain AI-assisted and traditional workflows.
-
Prediction score for death or lung transplant in emphysema caused by alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency
This study tests a new prediction tool to identify people with emphysema due to alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency who are at high risk of death or needing a lung transplant.
-
Timing of AI Help in Chest X-Rays: Does When AI Becomes Visible Change How Clinicians Read Images?
Doctors test chest X-ray interpretation with AI information shown either before or after they start reviewing the image to see how timing affects their search patterns and decisions.
-
Does AI-based cephalometric tracing match digital manual tracing for orthodontic measurements?
This study tests whether AI-powered cephalometric analysis can produce measurements similar to traditional digital tracing in 100 patient radiographs.
-
Heart score calculator test using GPT-4o and Claude in chest pain patients
This study tests whether two large language models can calculate HEART scores from patient notes and predict 30-day adverse heart events in adults with chest pain in the emergency department.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.