Immediate implant placement in molar sockets with or without bone graft
Official title: Evaluation of Soft and Hard Tissue Dimensional Changes Following Immediate Implant Placement in Molar Extraction Sockets With or Without Bone Graft: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Run by Misr International University · NCT06207617 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study tests whether placing an implant immediately after extracting a molar and using a customized healing abutment, with or without a graft, can help preserve the surrounding bone and soft tissue.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 50 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 28 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Misr International University Academic / other |
| Drugs / interventions | chemotherapy |
| Locations | 1 site (Cairo) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | February 1, 2026 |
| Main results expected | February 1, 2027 |
| Study ends | August 1, 2027 |
| Registry record updated | May 28, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT06207617 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults 18-50 with a non-restorable single mandibular first molar requiring extraction and favorable interradicular bone and soft tissue conditions.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with complex anatomy, systemic conditions affecting healing, or active infection may not benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
The trial compares two approaches after extracting a non-restorable mandibular first molar: immediate implant placement with a customized healing abutment alone, versus immediate implant placement with a xenogeneic bone graft plus a customized healing abutment. It measures primary stability and aims to assess buccolingual ridge changes and soft tissue remodeling during healing. The study uses a flapless extraction technique and standard Straumann implants, with radiographic CBCT criteria to select eligible participants. Outcomes focus on dimensional changes, tissue health, and feasibility in posterior molar sites. Enrollment targets adults 18-50 who meet specific anatomical criteria and consent to participate.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the approach could improve implant stability and preserve ridge dimensions in the molar region.
How similar studies have gone: Evidence in anterior sites supports immediate implants, but data in posterior molar sites remain limited; this trial explores a relatively novel context.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Adults from the age of 18 - 50 years of both genders. * Patients with non-restorable single bounded mandibular 1st molar tooth indicated for extraction. * Periodontally healthy patients with good oral hygiene. * Intact interradicular bone with 2-3 mm width, assessed by CBCT. * Thin buccal plate of bone (1 mm or less) among both of the mesial and distal root, assessed by CBCT. * Intact gingival tissue with at least 2 mm keratinized tissue. * Patients accepts to provide written informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: * Molar sites indicated for extraction with roots of close proximity to vital structures as inferior alveolar nerve. * Pregnant females. * Smokers as smoking is a contraindication for any plastic periodontal surgery (Khuller, 2009). * Handicapped and mentally retarded patients. * Patients undergoing chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. * Presence of systemic disease that would affect wound healing. * Presence of active infection with soft tissue communication.
Where it's running
-
International Dental Continuing Education
Cairo, Egypt Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Nourhan Gamal
- Email: nourhannegamal259@gmail.com
- Phone: 01064249441
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Enhanced hydrogel xenograft for open maxillary sinus augmentation
This study tests a hydrogel-enhanced xenograft material to lift the sinus floor during open augmentation and sees if it improves bone formation and tissue response compared with doing the augmentation without graft material.
-
Soft tissue augmentation around dental implants using connective tissue graft or less invasive approaches
This trial tests three ways to increase the soft tissue around a dental implant in adults with thin gums to see which method works best.
-
Using pre-operative findings and AI to predict whether full pulpotomy will succeed in painful mature molars
We will test whether pre-surgery clinical signs and an AI read of dental X-rays can predict if full pulpotomy will work for adults with irreversible pulpitis in mature molars.
-
Immediate implant placement with titanium mesh and xenograft versus collagen membrane for buccal bone defects in the front upper jaw
This trial tests whether adding a titanium mesh with xenograft to immediate implants helps build thicker buccal bone than using a collagen membrane alone in patients with front-upper jaw defects.
-
Bone level changes after equicrestal versus subcrestal dental implant placement in augmented posterior mandible
This trial will try whether placing implants slightly below the bone crest (subcrestal) versus level with the crest (equicrestal) leads to less crestal bone loss in adults who had prior mandibular ridge augmentation.
-
Comparing two techniques for treating ridge contour defects in the mouth
This study is testing a new method for fixing soft tissue defects in the mouth to see if it works better than the traditional graft technique for patients with ridge contour issues.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.