Flow-Controlled vs Volume-Controlled Ventilation in Lumbar Disc Herniation Surgery
Official title: Comparison of Flow-Controlled and Volume-Controlled Ventilation During Lumbar Disc Herniation Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Trial
Run by Ankara Etlik City Hospital · NCT07614555 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial tests whether flow-controlled ventilation works differently from volume-controlled ventilation during lumbar disc herniation surgery to see if it affects airway pressures and oxygen levels.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 65 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 80 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Ankara Etlik City Hospital Government |
| Locations | 1 site (Ankara) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | May 28, 2026 |
| Main results expected | November 12, 2026 |
| Study ends | November 26, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | June 1, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07614555 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults 18–65 years old, ASA I–III, BMI 18–30 kg/m², undergoing lumbar disc herniation surgery with planned intraoperative mechanical ventilation.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with known pulmonary disease, significant preoperative pulmonary impairment, prior major thoracic surgery, or those requiring preoperative supplemental oxygen may not benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This prospective randomized trial compares two ventilation modes—flow-controlled ventilation (FCV) and volume-controlled ventilation (VCV)—in adults undergoing lumbar disc herniation surgery under general anesthesia. Ventilation parameters and oxygenation metrics are collected at predefined times after intubation, with the primary endpoint being arterial PaO2 after 20 minutes in the prone position. Eligible participants are 18–65 years old, ASA I–III, and BMI 18–30 kg/m². The study aims to inform whether FCV offers hemodynamic or respiratory advantages over VCV during this specific surgical setting.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If FCV demonstrates superior oxygenation or favorable airway pressures, it could improve intraoperative respiratory management for patients undergoing spine surgery.
How similar studies have gone: Prior research in intraoperative ventilation has explored FCV versus VCV with mixed results; this study adds data in a spine surgery context.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Age between 18 and 65 years * ASA physical status I-III * Body Mass Index between 18 and 30 kg/m² Exclusion Criteria: * Age \< 18 years or \> 65 years * Known or previously diagnosed pulmonary disease * Patients with severe preoperative pulmonary function impairment (e.g., FEV₁ \< 50% predicted, severe restrictive or obstructive pathology) * Patients with markedly altered lung anatomy or function due to prior major thoracic surgery * Patients who were dependent on supplemental oxygen therapy in the preoperative period * ASA physical status IV or higher * Refusal or inability to provide informed consent
Where it's running
-
Ankara Etlik City Hospital
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye) Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Atakan Sezgi
- Email: kansezgi@gmail.com
- Phone: 00905323327000
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Pulse Wave vs Saline Bolus EIT to measure lung perfusion in ARDS
This study tests whether pulse wave EIT or saline bolus EIT can best show lung blood flow in ARDS patients on mechanical ventilation.
-
Computed inspiratory muscle pressure to monitor inspiratory effort during pressure-targeted assist/control ventilation
This study tests a noninvasive computed pressure method (cPmus) to see if it matches the traditional esophageal pressure method for measuring inspiratory effort in adults on pressure-targeted ventilation with spontaneous breathing.
-
Noninvasive estimate of inspiratory effort to monitor pressure support ventilation
This study tests whether a noninvasive computed inspiratory muscle pressure (cPmus) can match the traditional esophageal pressure method for adults on pressure support ventilation.
-
Driving pressure-guided individualized PEEP vs standard PEEP during upper abdominal surgery
In this randomized trial, adults at higher risk of breathing problems after upper abdominal surgery will try a personalized PEEP level based on the lowest driving pressure and compare it to a fixed PEEP of 5 cmH2O to see if it lowers postoperative lung complications.
-
Inspiratory Effort and Dyspnea During Assisted Mechanical Ventilation in Critically Ill Adults
This study tests how different patient breathing efforts relate to breathlessness in adults on assisted mechanical ventilation.
-
FCV vs VC—Obese Adults Undergoing Laparoscopic Surgery
In obese adults having laparoscopic surgery, researchers will see if flow-controlled ventilation (FCV) works better than volume-controlled ventilation with autoflow (VC-AF) at keeping airway pressures and lung energy lower.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.