Dynamic Anterior Stabilization vs Bankart Repair for recurrent shoulder instability
Official title: Comparative Outcomes of Arthroscopic Surgical Techniques in Anterior Shoulder Instability With Glenoid Bone Loss 10-20%
Run by Riga Stradins University · NCT07876232 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study tests whether Dynamic Anterior Stabilization (DAS) or traditional Bankart repair better stabilizes the shoulder in people under 50 with recurring anterior instability and 10-20% glenoid bone loss.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 50 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 60 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Riga Stradins University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Riga) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | November 1, 2024 |
| Main results expected | August 31, 2027 |
| Study ends | August 31, 2029 |
| Registry record updated | October 15, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07876232 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults ≤50 years with recurrent anterior shoulder instability, MRI-confirmed anterior labral injury, Hill-Sachs lesion, and 10-20% glenoid bone loss.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with age >50, multifactorial shoulder instability, or substantial glenoid bone loss outside the 10-20% range may not benefit from these strategies.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This single-center prospective comparison enrolls 60 participants with chronic anterior shoulder instability and subcritical glenoid bone loss (10-20%). Participants undergo random or programmatic allocation to either arthroscopic Bankart repair or Dynamic Anterior Stabilization (DAS) using the long head of the biceps tendon. Outcomes are measured preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months using the Constant Score, ASES score, pain via VAS, and Oxford instability score, along with recurrence and return-to-activity data. The study also collects MRI/CT evaluations to characterize soft-tissue injury and bone loss. All procedures are performed arthroscopically by a single surgeon, with intraoperative tissue sampling for histopathology.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the trial could clarify which surgical approach provides better stability and function for patients with subcritical bone loss, potentially guiding surgical decision-making.
How similar studies have gone: Prior research suggests both Bankart repair and DAS can improve stability, but direct head-to-head data in subcritical bone loss are limited, making this comparative study relatively novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients aged ≤50 years; * History of anterior shoulder dislocation and/or subluxation; * Persistent anterior glenohumeral instability; * MRI-confirmed anterior labral injury and Hill-Sachs lesion; * CT-confirmed glenoid bone loss of 10-20% of the total glenoid articular surface. Exclusion Criteria: * Patients aged \>50 years; * Concomitant injuries or pathological conditions involving other structures of the shoulder joint; * Multidirectional shoulder instability; * Previous surgical procedures on the affected shoulder; * Acute infection; * Coagulation disorders; * Systemic diseases, including diabetes mellitus (DM), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), gout, and autoimmune diseases (AIDs).
Where it's running
-
ORTO Klīnika
Riga, Latvia Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Andrejs Finogejevs, M.D.
- Email: andrejs.finogejevs@inbox.lv
- Phone: +37129951841
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Modified PENG plus SSNB vs Interscalene block for Bankart and Latarjet surgery
This trial tests whether a Modified PENG block with a Suprascapular Nerve Block provides similar pain relief to an Interscalene block for adults having Bankart repair or Latarjet surgery.
-
Sling vs Dynamic Shoulder Brace After Shoulder Stabilization
This pilot randomized trial tests whether a dynamic shoulder orthosis helps people recover faster after arthroscopic stabilization for anterior shoulder instability compared with a standard sling.
-
Reactive balance training vs. conventional balance training for tennis players
In competitive tennis players, this study tests whether reactive balance training improves dynamic stability and change-of-direction performance more than traditional balance training over six weeks.
-
French 20-year follow-up after shoulder instability surgery
This 20-year follow-up will track people who had surgery for shoulder instability to see if their repairs last, how well they return to sport, and what long-term problems occur.
-
Using virtual reality to help rehabilitate shoulder injuries
This study tests whether using virtual reality can make shoulder rehabilitation more engaging and effective for people with shoulder injuries.
-
AI analysis of surgeons' techniques during coronary artery bypass grafting
We will see if an AI program can score surgeons' stitching technique during left anterior descending artery bypass in adults having their first isolated CABG.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.