Sling vs Dynamic Shoulder Brace After Shoulder Stabilization
Official title: Sling vs. Dynamic Shoulder Stabilizer After Soft Tissue Shoulder Instability Surgery ("SLIDY"): A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Assessing Feasibility, Early Functional Recovery, and Structural Healing
Run by Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge · NCT07644624 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This pilot randomized trial tests whether a dynamic shoulder orthosis helps people recover faster after arthroscopic stabilization for anterior shoulder instability compared with a standard sling.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 40 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalonia) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | June 15, 2026 |
| Main results expected | December 15, 2027 |
| Study ends | June 15, 2028 |
| Registry record updated | June 17, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07644624 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults 18 years or older undergoing arthroscopic soft-tissue stabilization for anterior shoulder instability (Bankart repair ± Hill-Sachs remplissage) who can comply with follow-up and consent.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with significant glenoid bone loss, concomitant rotator cuff repair, or contraindications to the study devices may not benefit and could be excluded.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This prospective, single-center pilot randomized controlled trial compares two postoperative immobilization methods after arthroscopic soft-tissue stabilization for anterior shoulder instability. Participants are assigned 1:1 to either a dynamic shoulder orthosis (medi Shoulder action brace) or a conventional fabric arm sling. The study measures early shoulder function, pain, recurrence risk, and patient satisfaction to assess feasibility for a larger future trial. Outcomes will guide whether dynamic immobilization offers advantages in early recovery and comfort without increasing instability.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, patients may experience faster or more comfortable early recovery with the dynamic immobilizer.
How similar studies have gone: Prior work in immobilization methods suggests potential benefits from dynamic supports, but this specific comparison is novel and feasibility data are limited.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Adults aged ≥18 years undergoing arthroscopic soft-tissue stabilization for anterior shoulder instability (Bankart repair ± Hill-Sachs remplissage). * Ability and willingness to comply with the study protocol and scheduled follow-ups. * Provision of written informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: * Significant glenoid bone loss requiring bony augmentation procedures (e.g., bone block procedures, Latarjet). * Concomitant rotator cuff repair or fracture fixation. * Contraindication to MRI (e.g., pacemaker, claustrophobia, incompatible implants). * Cognitive impairment, language barriers, or logistical inability to attend follow-up visits. * Previous ipsilateral shoulder surgery.
Where it's running
-
Bellvitge University Hospital
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalonia, Spain Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Abdul-ilah Hachem, MD — Head of the Shoulder Unit, Department of Orthopaedics, Bellvitge Univeristy Hospital
- Study coordinator: Abdul-ilah Hachem, MD
- Email: abelhachem@gmail.com
- Phone: +34609406030
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Dynamic Anterior Stabilization vs Bankart Repair for recurrent shoulder instability
This study tests whether Dynamic Anterior Stabilization (DAS) or traditional Bankart repair better stabilizes the shoulder in people under 50 with recurring anterior instability and 10-20% glenoid bone loss.
-
Arthroscopic stabilization for anterior shoulder instability with subcritical glenoid bone loss
This study tests two arthroscopic stabilization methods to help people with recurrent anterior shoulder instability and subcritical glenoid bone loss see if they achieve better stability.
-
Modified PENG plus SSNB vs Interscalene block for Bankart and Latarjet surgery
This trial tests whether a Modified PENG block with a Suprascapular Nerve Block provides similar pain relief to an Interscalene block for adults having Bankart repair or Latarjet surgery.
-
French 20-year follow-up after shoulder instability surgery
This 20-year follow-up will track people who had surgery for shoulder instability to see if their repairs last, how well they return to sport, and what long-term problems occur.
-
Using virtual reality to help rehabilitate shoulder injuries
This study tests whether using virtual reality can make shoulder rehabilitation more engaging and effective for people with shoulder injuries.
-
Evaluating treatment options for first-time shoulder dislocation
This study is testing whether a surgical option or a non-surgical approach works better for young people who have just dislocated their shoulder for the first time.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.