Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Interventional Ages 18 to 25

Reactive balance training vs. conventional balance training for tennis players

Official title: Effect of Reactive Balance Training Versus Conventional Balance Training on Dynamic Stability and Change-of-Direction Performance in Competitive Tennis Players

Run by Ibadat International University, Islamabad · NCT07590674 · Data updated 2026-11-12

In competitive tennis players, this study tests whether reactive balance training improves dynamic stability and change-of-direction performance more than traditional balance training over six weeks.

More Postural Balance trials

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
Ages18 Years to 25 Years
SexAll
Enrollment64 (estimated)
SponsorIbadat International University, Islamabad
Academic / other
Locations1 site (Islamabad)
StatusRecruiting
StartedMay 15, 2026
Main results expectedJuly 2026
Study endsJuly 2026
Registry record updatedJune 26, 2026
Trial IDNCT07590674 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Ideal candidates are male or female competitive tennis players aged 18–25 with at least two years of regular training and currently practicing at least three 60-minute sessions weekly.

Probably not a fit

Athletes with recent injuries, neurological or vestibular disorders, prior surgery, or those already engaged in structured balance or agility programs outside regular tennis practice may not benefit.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This randomized controlled trial compares two balance-training approaches in competitive tennis players aged 18–25. Participants are randomly assigned to either reactive balance training with external perturbations and sport-specific reactive tasks, or conventional static and controlled balance exercises. Both groups train three times weekly for six weeks, with standardized intensity and sessions including warm-up, balance work, and cool-down. Outcomes are measured at baseline and after intervention using the Y-Balance Test for dynamic stability and the 505 Agility Test for change-of-direction performance. The goal is to determine which method yields greater improvements in balance and functional performance relevant to tennis.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, this approach could help players improve balance and agility more effectively during competitive play.

How similar studies have gone: Previous research supports the potential of task-specific and perturbation-based balance training to enhance athletic performance, though direct comparisons in tennis are limited.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* Male and female competitive tennis players aged 18-25 years.
* Minimum 2 years of regular tennis training experience.
* Currently training at least 3 sessions per week (minimum 60 minutes per session).

Exclusion Criteria:

* Recent injury (last 3 months)
* Neurological, balance or vestibular disorders
* Previous surgery
* Participation in any structured balance, neuromuscular, plyometric, or agility training program outside regular tennis practice during the study period.
* Use of ankle/knee braces or orthotic devices that may influence balance performance.

Where it's running

  • Ibadat International University, Islamabad (Iiui)
    Islamabad, Pakistan
    Recruiting

Study contacts

  • Principal investigator: Hafsah Gul Khattak, DPT, MSNMPT — Ibadat International University, Islamabad (Iiui)
  • Study coordinator: Laiba Zia Laiba Zia, DPT, MSPT (SPORTS)
  • Email: zialaiba0@gmail.com
  • Phone: +92923125299816

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.