Reactive balance training vs. conventional balance training for tennis players
Official title: Effect of Reactive Balance Training Versus Conventional Balance Training on Dynamic Stability and Change-of-Direction Performance in Competitive Tennis Players
Run by Ibadat International University, Islamabad · NCT07590674 · Data updated 2026-11-12
In competitive tennis players, this study tests whether reactive balance training improves dynamic stability and change-of-direction performance more than traditional balance training over six weeks.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 25 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 64 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Ibadat International University, Islamabad Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Islamabad) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | May 15, 2026 |
| Main results expected | July 2026 |
| Study ends | July 2026 |
| Registry record updated | June 26, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07590674 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are male or female competitive tennis players aged 18–25 with at least two years of regular training and currently practicing at least three 60-minute sessions weekly.
✕Probably not a fit
Athletes with recent injuries, neurological or vestibular disorders, prior surgery, or those already engaged in structured balance or agility programs outside regular tennis practice may not benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This randomized controlled trial compares two balance-training approaches in competitive tennis players aged 18–25. Participants are randomly assigned to either reactive balance training with external perturbations and sport-specific reactive tasks, or conventional static and controlled balance exercises. Both groups train three times weekly for six weeks, with standardized intensity and sessions including warm-up, balance work, and cool-down. Outcomes are measured at baseline and after intervention using the Y-Balance Test for dynamic stability and the 505 Agility Test for change-of-direction performance. The goal is to determine which method yields greater improvements in balance and functional performance relevant to tennis.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this approach could help players improve balance and agility more effectively during competitive play.
How similar studies have gone: Previous research supports the potential of task-specific and perturbation-based balance training to enhance athletic performance, though direct comparisons in tennis are limited.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Male and female competitive tennis players aged 18-25 years. * Minimum 2 years of regular tennis training experience. * Currently training at least 3 sessions per week (minimum 60 minutes per session). Exclusion Criteria: * Recent injury (last 3 months) * Neurological, balance or vestibular disorders * Previous surgery * Participation in any structured balance, neuromuscular, plyometric, or agility training program outside regular tennis practice during the study period. * Use of ankle/knee braces or orthotic devices that may influence balance performance.
Where it's running
-
Ibadat International University, Islamabad (Iiui)
Islamabad, Pakistan Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Hafsah Gul Khattak, DPT, MSNMPT — Ibadat International University, Islamabad (Iiui)
- Study coordinator: Laiba Zia Laiba Zia, DPT, MSPT (SPORTS)
- Email: zialaiba0@gmail.com
- Phone: +92923125299816
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Diaphragmatic Breathing Training in Combat Sport Athletes with Dysfunctional Breathing
This study tests whether diaphragmatic breathing training can improve breathing patterns, core stability, and sport-related performance in combat sport athletes with dysfunctional breathing.
-
Dynamic Anterior Stabilization vs Bankart Repair for recurrent shoulder instability
This study tests whether Dynamic Anterior Stabilization (DAS) or traditional Bankart repair better stabilizes the shoulder in people under 50 with recurring anterior instability and 10-20% glenoid bone loss.
-
Reactive Balance Training vs Task-Oriented Training for Postural Stability in Diabetic Neuropathy
This trial tests whether Reactive Balance Training or Task-Oriented Training improves postural stability in adults with diabetic peripheral neuropathy.
-
Ketone and Carbohydrate Supplementation in Endurance Cycling
This study tests whether adding ketones to a carb plan helps amateur endurance cyclists perform better and think more clearly during long, exhausting rides.
-
Effect of a single session of inspiratory muscle training on performance in elite volleyball players
A single session of inspiratory muscle training is tested to see if it improves muscle oxygenation, exercise capacity, balance, and agility in elite male volleyball players aged 18–25.
-
Horse Riding Simulator Added to Core Exercises in Adolescents with Idiopathic Scoliosis
In adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis, adding a horse riding simulator to a core stabilization program is being tested to see if it improves breathing muscle strength, balance, quality of life, and how they feel about their posture.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.