Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Interventional Ages 20 to 40 Women only

Dual Trigger vs HCG Trigger for Final Maturation in Normal Responders

Official title: Dual Trigger VS HCG Trigger for Final Oocyte Maturation in Normal Responders a Randomized Controlled Trial

Run by Al-Azhar University · NCT07861399 · Data updated 2026-11-12

In normal responders undergoing ICSI cycles, this study tests whether using a dual trigger (GnRH agonist plus hCG) improves outcomes compared with the standard hCG trigger.

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
Ages20 Years to 40 Years
SexWomen only
Enrollment100 (estimated)
SponsorAl-Azhar University
Academic / other
Locations1 site (Cairo, Cairo Governorate)
StatusRecruiting
StartedSeptember 1, 2026
Main results expectedAugust 2028
Study endsOctober 2028
Registry record updatedOctober 6, 2026
Trial IDNCT07861399 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Women aged 20-40 with BMI 18-30, normal ovarian reserve, AMH 1.2–3.5 ng/mL, AFC 7–15, and undergoing their first or second ICSI cycle using a GnRH antagonist protocol.

Probably not a fit

Patients with poor or high ovarian response, PCOS, or significant endocrine or systemic conditions may not benefit from this approach.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This trial compares two methods to trigger final oocyte maturation in normal-responder women undergoing ICSI with a GnRH antagonist protocol. Participants are randomized to receive either a dual trigger (GnRH agonist plus hCG) or an hCG trigger alone. Primary outcome is the number of mature MII oocytes, with secondary outcomes including total oocytes retrieved, fertilization rate, embryo quality, implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, multiple pregnancy rate, and OHSS incidence. Eligible participants are women aged 20-40 with BMI 18-30, normal ovarian reserve, and undergoing their first or second ICSI cycle. Exclusion criteria include poor or high ovarian response, PCOS, high Day-of-trigger E2, significant endocrine disorders, uterine abnormalities, or severe systemic disease.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, the dual trigger approach could improve oocyte maturity and pregnancy outcomes for normal responders.

How similar studies have gone: Previous studies in diverse populations have explored dual trigger strategies with variable results, making this evaluation in normal responders informative but not conclusively proven.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* Women aged 20-40 years.
* Body mass index (BMI) between 18 and 30 kg/m².
* Undergoing ICSI treatment using a GnRH antagonist protocol.
* Normal ovarian reserve and expected normal ovarian response.
* AMH between 1.2 - 3.5 ng/ml
* AFC 7-15 follicle.
* First or second ICSI cycle.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Poor ovarian response (Bologna/POSEIDON criteria)
* High ovarian response with a risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) AMH \> 3.5 ng/ml or AFC \> 15 follicle.
* Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).
* Serum E2 level \> 3500 pg/ml at day of triggering.
* Endocrine disorders including diabetes mellitus, thyroid dysfunction, hyperprolactinemia, congenital adrenal hyperplasia, or Cushing syndrome.
* Congenital uterine abnormalities.
* Severe systemic diseases affecting fertility outcomes.

Where it's running

  • ART Unit, International Islamic Center for Population Studies and Research, Al-Azhar University
    Cairo, Cairo Governorate, Egypt
    Recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.