Donor ankle sensorimotor recovery after ACL reconstruction with a peroneus longus graft
Official title: Recovery of Donor Ankle Sensorimotor Function Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Peroneus Longus Tendon Autograft: A Prospective Longitudinal Study
Run by Gazi University · NCT07762989 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study tests how the donor ankle recovers sensorimotor function after ACL reconstruction using a peroneus longus tendon autograft in adults 18–55.
Quick facts
| Study type | Observational |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 55 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 20 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Gazi University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Çankaya, Ankara) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | August 22, 2026 |
| Main results expected | August 1, 2027 |
| Study ends | October 1, 2027 |
| Registry record updated | October 9, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07762989 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults aged 18–55 who underwent unilateral ACL reconstruction with a peroneus longus tendon autograft and are referred to the Gazi University Sports Health Unit.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients who did not receive a peroneus longus autograft or those with complicating factors such as multiligament injuries or pre-existing ankle pathology may see no direct benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This prospective observational study follows 20 adults who had ACL reconstruction with a peroneus longus tendon autograft, assessing donor-ankle sensorimotor function at 6-8 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. Within-subject comparisons between the donor ankle and the opposite ankle will use surface electromyography of the peroneus longus, force-plattform postural control tests, gait analysis with inertial sensors, ankle joint-position sense testing, and patient-reported foot and ankle outcomes. The study does not assign surgical or rehabilitation interventions and aims to describe the natural course of donor-site recovery using objective measurements. Data will inform how donor-site function evolves over time and whether measurable deficits persist or resolve during the first six post-op months.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the findings could clarify donor-site recovery trajectories and inform rehabilitation strategies to optimize donor ankle function after ACL reconstruction.
How similar studies have gone: Previous work has described donor-site outcomes in similar graft contexts but longitudinal, objective donor-ankle sensorimotor data over 6 months is relatively novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Age 18 to 55 years. * Unilateral primary anterior cruciate ligament tear confirmed by clinical examination and magnetic resonance imaging. * Primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction performed using a peroneus longus tendon autograft. * Able and willing to attend the postoperative assessments at 6-8 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. * Written informed consent provided before study participation. Exclusion Criteria: * Multiligament knee injury. * Previous surgery on the index knee or donor ankle. * Pre-existing ankle instability or major foot or ankle pathology. * Neurological or neuromuscular disease. * Inflammatory or systemic disease that may affect the assessments. * Major lower-extremity deformity that may affect the assessments. * Unable to complete the postoperative rehabilitation program or scheduled follow-up assessments.
Where it's running
-
Gazi University Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Sports Health Unit
Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye) Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Dudu Ozdemir Can, Msc — Gazi University
- Study coordinator: Dudu Ozdemir Can, Msc
- Email: duduozdemir@gazi.edu.tr
- Phone: +90 5534448492
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
ACL reconstruction using a human cortical bone (Shark Screw®) versus a biocomposite interference screw
This trial will test whether using a human cortical bone screw (Shark Screw®) instead of a biocomposite interference screw reduces tunnel widening and keeps re-rupture rates low for people having ACL reconstruction.
-
Correlation between where the knee tunnels are placed during ACL reconstruction and how well the knee heals
This study tests whether the position of the femoral and tibial tunnels during ACL reconstruction relates to how well patients recover.
-
Analgesic effects of adding BiFeS block to adductor canal block after ACL reconstruction
This study tests whether adding a BiFeS block to the standard adductor canal block provides better pain relief after ACL reconstruction.
-
Neuromuscular Profiles After ACL Reconstruction
This study tests how quadriceps and hamstring strength and muscle activation patterns look 4–12 months after ACL reconstruction to see if distinct neuromuscular profiles emerge.
-
Quadriceps tendon vs peroneus longus tendon grafts for ACL reconstruction
This randomized trial tests whether using a quadriceps tendon autograft works as well as a peroneus longus tendon autograft for ACL reconstruction in adults, looking at knee function and donor-site effects.
-
Bone-patellar tendon–bone graft versus patellar tendon graft for ACL reconstruction
This randomized comparison tests whether a patellar tendon graft without the patellar bone plug reduces donor-site problems and gives similar knee function to the standard bone–patellar tendon–bone graft in athletes undergoing ACL reconstruction.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.