Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Interventional Ages 18 and up

Comparing two methods for removing IVC filters

Official title: Prospective Comparison of Rigid Forceps Versus Endovascular Snare for Routine IVC Filter Retrieval

Run by University of Chicago · NCT04092192 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This study is testing two different ways to remove IVC filters to see which one works better and is quicker for patients who have had these filters for less than six months.

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
Ages18 Years and up
SexAll
Enrollment100 (estimated)
SponsorUniversity of Chicago
Academic / other
Drugs / interventionsradiation
Locations1 site (Chicago, Illinois)
StatusRecruiting
StartedDecember 26, 2018
Main results expectedJanuary 30, 2028
Study endsJanuary 30, 2028
Registry record updatedJanuary 7, 2026
Trial IDNCT04092192 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Ideal candidates are non-pregnant adults aged 18 and older who require IVC filter removal within six months of implantation.

Probably not a fit

Patients with filters implanted for more than six months or those with specific medical conditions such as coagulopathy or central venous occlusion may not benefit from this study.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This study aims to compare two common techniques for the removal of inferior vena cava (IVC) filters: the endovascular snare device and rigid forceps. By prospectively evaluating these methods, the study seeks to determine which technique offers better success rates and shorter procedure times, thereby minimizing radiation exposure. The research will be conducted at UChicago Medicine, focusing on patients who have had IVC filters implanted for less than six months. Both techniques have been previously evaluated independently, but this study will provide a direct comparison.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, this study could lead to improved IVC filter removal techniques, enhancing patient safety and outcomes.

How similar studies have gone: While both techniques have been evaluated separately in literature, this direct comparison is novel and has not been previously tested.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* Non-pregnant females
* Adult patients (age 18 years and older)
* Referred to Interventional Radiology for IVC filter removal
* IVC filter implanted less than 6 months with the procedure being performed at UCMC by current IR staff.
* Cook Celect filter or Argon Medical Option Elite

Exclusion Criteria:

* Patients with outside hospital filter placement
* Filters other than Cook Celect or Argon Medical Option Elite
* Implantation period \>6 months
* Evidence of coagulopathy (INR \<1.8, platelet count \>50k)
* Clotting disorder
* Central venous occlusion
* Prior filter placement/removal.

Where it's running

  • UChicago Medicine
    Chicago, Illinois, United States
    Recruiting

Study contacts

  • Principal investigator: Osmanuddin Ahmed, MD — UChicago Medicine
  • Study coordinator: Osmanuddin Ahmed, MD
  • Email: oahmed@uchicago.edu
  • Phone: 773-795-7226

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.