Comparing two methods for preserving organs in rectal cancer patients
Official title: Organ Preservation in Patients With a Good Clinical Response After (Chemo)Radiation for Rectal Cancer: Defining the Role of Additional Contact X-ray Brachytherapy Versus Extending the Waiting Interval and Local Excision
Run by The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NCT05772923 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing two different ways to treat rectal cancer in patients who responded well to initial treatment, to see which method helps them keep their organs and improve their quality of life.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 168 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | The Netherlands Cancer Institute Academic / other |
| Drugs / interventions | chemotherapy, radiation |
| Locations | 7 sites (Nijmegen, Gelderland and 6 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | April 16, 2021 |
| Main results expected | March 2025 |
| Study ends | March 2029 |
| Registry record updated | March 17, 2023 |
| Trial ID | NCT05772923 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates include patients with histologically verified adenocarcinoma located above the dentate line and within 10cm of the anal verge, who have had a good clinical response after neoadjuvant (chemo)radiation.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with significant distant metastases or those who do not meet the specific clinical response criteria may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This prospective phase II feasibility study evaluates two local treatment options for rectal cancer patients who have shown a good clinical response after neoadjuvant (chemo)radiation. The study compares contact x-ray brachytherapy with an extended waiting interval and local excision to determine which method achieves better rates of organ preservation. The rationale is to improve patients' quality of life by avoiding total mesorectal excision surgery. The study aims to optimize treatment strategies based on the extent of clinical response monitored through radiological and endoscopic assessments.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could lead to improved organ preservation and quality of life for rectal cancer patients.
How similar studies have gone: Other studies have explored organ preservation in rectal cancer, but this specific comparison of treatment options is novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * histologically verified adenocarcinoma above the dentate line and within 10cm of the anal verge; * neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy for patients with 1) IRC and delayed response evaluation according to the Dutch national guidelines (cT1-3, cN1-2 lymph nodal status, no involved MRF or cT3c-d, N0-1 lymph nodal status without pres-ence of significant distant metastases) without full dose chemotherapy in the inter-val (e.g. Rapido-scheme) or 2) LARC due to comorbidity or frailty; OR * neoadjuvant long-course radiotherapy (chemoradiation) for patients with 1) LARC according to the Dutch national guidelines (cT4 tumour, cN2 lymph nodal status, lateral lymph node involvement, and/or involved MRF, without the presence of significant distant metastases) or 2) early rectal cancer or IRC and a strong wish for organ preservation; * clinically near-complete response or a small residual tumour mass \<3 cm; * technically feasible to perform both treatment options (contact x-ray brachytherapy or local excision); * age \>18 years; * written informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: * neoadjuvant or induction chemotherapy prior or adjacent to (chemo)radiation, e.g. patients with a Rapido or M1-scheme are not eligible; * radiation dose \>50.4 Gy or boost dose on the primary tumour; * presence of suspicious lymph nodes (yN1/N2) at first response evaluation; * residual tumour ≥ 3cm or over half of the circumference of the rectal lumen; * patients who are unable to undergo contact x-ray brachytherapy or local excision; * patients who cannot tolerate a completion- or salvage-TME because of comorbidity or frailty;
Where it's running
-
Radbouw University Medical Centre
Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands Recruiting -
Catharina Hospital
Eindhoven, North Brabant, Netherlands Recruiting -
Antoni van Leeuwenhoek
Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands Recruiting -
Deventer Hospital
Deventer, Overijssel, Netherlands Recruiting -
Isala
Zwolle, Overijssel, Netherlands Recruiting -
Medical Center Leeuwarden
Leeuwarden, Provincie Friesland, Netherlands Recruiting
Show 1 more location
-
Ijsselland Hospital
Capelle aan den IJssel, South Holland, Netherlands Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Brechtje A Grotenhuis, MD, PhD — Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital
- Study coordinator: Barbara M Geubels, MD
- Email: b.geubels@nki.nl
- Phone: 0205129001
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Comparing total neoadjuvant therapy with surgery for rectal cancer treatment
This study is testing if rectal cancer patients who respond well to a new treatment can skip surgery and just be monitored to see how they do compared to those who have surgery right away.
-
Single vs. double stapling and purse-string techniques after rectal cancer surgery
This trial tests whether using a single-stapling method to join the bowel after rectal cancer surgery results in fewer leaks compared with the double-stapling method.
-
DEM301 in advanced colorectal cancer: a first-in-human test
This first-in-human Phase 1 study tests DEM301 in adults with advanced metastatic colorectal cancer to see if it is safe, how it behaves in the body, and whether it shows any signs of activity.
-
Rectal cancer registry to track real-world treatments and outcomes
This registry collects real-world data on how locally advanced rectal cancer is treated in Austria, to see how TNT and dMMR/MSI-H cases are managed and what outcomes occur.
-
Aerobic exercise and guided imagery for bowel problems after rectal cancer surgery
This study tests whether a program of aerobic exercise plus guided imagery helps people with low anterior resection syndrome after rectal cancer surgery.
-
Active surveillance vs chemoradiotherapy after local removal of intermediate-risk T1 rectal cancer
This study tests whether close follow-up alone after local removal of early rectal cancer can match the cancer control of adding chemoradiotherapy, while reducing treatment-related side effects.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.