Single vs. double stapling and purse-string techniques after rectal cancer surgery
Official title: Single Vs Double Stapling Technique & Intracorporeal Vs Transanal Purse-String in Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer: An Adjusted Comparative RCT Evaluating Anastomotic Leak, Oncological and Patient-Reported Outcomes
Run by Alexandria University · NCT07929415 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial tests whether using a single-stapling method to join the bowel after rectal cancer surgery results in fewer leaks compared with the double-stapling method.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 70 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 124 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Alexandria University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Alexandria) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | November 5, 2026 |
| Main results expected | May 1, 2027 |
| Study ends | July 1, 2027 |
| Registry record updated | November 10, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07929415 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults aged 18-80 with histologically confirmed rectal adenocarcinoma within 16 cm of the anal verge, planned for sphincter-preserving low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients not meeting eligibility or those in whom neither stapling technique is feasible may not benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This prospective, single-center randomized study at Alexandria University will compare single-stapled versus double-stapled colorectal anastomosis after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal adenocarcinoma. Within the single-stapling group, participants are further randomized to intracorporeal versus transanal placement of the purse-string suture. Primary aims include differences in anastomotic healing and leakage rates, with secondary assessments of oncologic resection quality and patient-reported bowel function and quality of life. Allocation is intraoperative and uses independent randomization to ensure unbiased group assignment. A total of 124 adults aged 18-80 will be enrolled, with 62 in the double-stapling arm and 31 in each single-stapling subgroup.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this approach could reduce bowel leaks and improve recovery after rectal cancer surgery.
How similar studies have gone: Previous research has explored stapling techniques with mixed results; this study adds a specific intraoperative randomization and purse-string placement comparison.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Age 18-80 years. * Histologically confirmed rectal adenocarcinoma, with the tumor located within 16 cm of the anal verge, measured by rigid proctoscopy or magnetic resonance imaging. * Candidate for elective sphincter-preserving low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision. * American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification I-III. * Ability to provide written informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: * Locally advanced disease unsuitable for curative resection or metastatic disease (M1). * Emergency surgery for obstruction or perforation. * Previous pelvic radiotherapy for conditions other than the current rectal cancer. * Planned abdominoperineal resection or Hartmann's procedure. * Coagulopathy or contraindication to the use of surgical stapling devices. * Inability to complete follow-up questionnaires.
Where it's running
-
Alexandria University
Alexandria, Egypt Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Ahmed Mohi eldein, PhD
- Email: Ahmed.eldaoushy@alexmed.edu.eg
- Phone: +201281362223
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
DEM301 in advanced colorectal cancer: a first-in-human test
This first-in-human Phase 1 study tests DEM301 in adults with advanced metastatic colorectal cancer to see if it is safe, how it behaves in the body, and whether it shows any signs of activity.
-
Rectal cancer registry to track real-world treatments and outcomes
This registry collects real-world data on how locally advanced rectal cancer is treated in Austria, to see how TNT and dMMR/MSI-H cases are managed and what outcomes occur.
-
Aerobic exercise and guided imagery for bowel problems after rectal cancer surgery
This study tests whether a program of aerobic exercise plus guided imagery helps people with low anterior resection syndrome after rectal cancer surgery.
-
Active surveillance vs chemoradiotherapy after local removal of intermediate-risk T1 rectal cancer
This study tests whether close follow-up alone after local removal of early rectal cancer can match the cancer control of adding chemoradiotherapy, while reducing treatment-related side effects.
-
Different-Dose Short-Course Radiotherapy With CAPOX, PD-1 Blockade, and IL-2 in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
This phase II trial tests whether a low-dose short-course radiotherapy combined with CAPOX, a PD-1 blocker, and IL-2 works as well as the standard-dose short-course approach in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.
-
Higher radiation dose to the tumor to avoid surgery in rectal cancer
Aims to see if giving a higher dose of radiation to the tumor can help people with non-locally advanced rectal cancer keep their rectum without needing surgery.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.