Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Interventional Ages 18 to 70

Single vs. double stapling and purse-string techniques after rectal cancer surgery

Official title: Single Vs Double Stapling Technique & Intracorporeal Vs Transanal Purse-String in Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer: An Adjusted Comparative RCT Evaluating Anastomotic Leak, Oncological and Patient-Reported Outcomes

Run by Alexandria University · NCT07929415 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This trial tests whether using a single-stapling method to join the bowel after rectal cancer surgery results in fewer leaks compared with the double-stapling method.

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
Ages18 Years to 70 Years
SexAll
Enrollment124 (estimated)
SponsorAlexandria University
Academic / other
Locations1 site (Alexandria)
StatusRecruiting
StartedNovember 5, 2026
Main results expectedMay 1, 2027
Study endsJuly 1, 2027
Registry record updatedNovember 10, 2026
Trial IDNCT07929415 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Adults aged 18-80 with histologically confirmed rectal adenocarcinoma within 16 cm of the anal verge, planned for sphincter-preserving low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision.

Probably not a fit

Patients not meeting eligibility or those in whom neither stapling technique is feasible may not benefit.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This prospective, single-center randomized study at Alexandria University will compare single-stapled versus double-stapled colorectal anastomosis after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal adenocarcinoma. Within the single-stapling group, participants are further randomized to intracorporeal versus transanal placement of the purse-string suture. Primary aims include differences in anastomotic healing and leakage rates, with secondary assessments of oncologic resection quality and patient-reported bowel function and quality of life. Allocation is intraoperative and uses independent randomization to ensure unbiased group assignment. A total of 124 adults aged 18-80 will be enrolled, with 62 in the double-stapling arm and 31 in each single-stapling subgroup.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, this approach could reduce bowel leaks and improve recovery after rectal cancer surgery.

How similar studies have gone: Previous research has explored stapling techniques with mixed results; this study adds a specific intraoperative randomization and purse-string placement comparison.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* Age 18-80 years.
* Histologically confirmed rectal adenocarcinoma, with the tumor located within 16 cm of the anal verge, measured by rigid proctoscopy or magnetic resonance imaging.
* Candidate for elective sphincter-preserving low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision.
* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification I-III.
* Ability to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Locally advanced disease unsuitable for curative resection or metastatic disease (M1).
* Emergency surgery for obstruction or perforation.
* Previous pelvic radiotherapy for conditions other than the current rectal cancer.
* Planned abdominoperineal resection or Hartmann's procedure.
* Coagulopathy or contraindication to the use of surgical stapling devices.
* Inability to complete follow-up questionnaires.

Where it's running

  • Alexandria University
    Alexandria, Egypt
    Recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.